A Comparative Study of Technological Innovation Layouts of Chinese Specialization,Refinement,Differentiation,and Innovation (SRDI) Enterprises and German Hidden Champion Enterprises
Yang Xi1, Deng Zhenyu1, Fu Tianhua2
1. Center for Studies of Intellectual Property Rights, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China; 2. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
Abstract：Chinese Specialization,Refinement,Differentiation,and Innovation (SRDI)enterprises represent an important force in developing new quality productive forces,while German hidden champion enterprises are the core force of “Industry 4.0”.Based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation Behaviour (COM-B)model,this paper integrates technological capabilities of enterprises with their cooperation ability,constructs a research framework for identifying patent opportunities within enterprises,and analyzes the technological innovation layouts of Chinese SRDI enterprises and German hidden champion enterprises.It is found that at the motivational level,Chinese SRDI enterprises exhibit the geographical distribution pattern of “bipolar with multi-core,dense in the east and sparse in the west”.Chinese SRDI enterprises are mostly distributed in the biotechnology industry and new generation information technology industry.Due to their relatively short establishment time,these enterprises have fewer patents;German hidden champion enterprises exhibit the geographical distribution pattern of “southwest clustering”,mostly distributed in the new materials industry and new generation information technology industry.As German hidden champion enterprises were established in the 20th century or earlier,they have accumulated a large number of patents.At the capability level,in terms of technological capabilities,Chinese SRDI enterprises tend to deepen their expertise in specific technological fields to enhance specialization;while German hidden champion enterprises are more inclined to expand into broader technological fields.In terms of cooperation ability,Chinese SRDI enterprises lag behind German hidden champion enterprises both in the scope and depth of their collaboration.At the opportunity level,Chinese and German enterprises are divided into four types.To address the weaknesses of each type,measures such as strengthening research and development,deepening collaboration with existing partners,actively exploring potential new technology themes and partners should be implemented to enhance innovation capabilities of enterprises.
杨曦, 邓臻宇, 付天华. 中国专精特新企业与德国隐形冠军企业技术创新布局比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(1): 149-160.
Yang Xi, Deng Zhenyu, Fu Tianhua. A Comparative Study of Technological Innovation Layouts of Chinese Specialization,Refinement,Differentiation,and Innovation (SRDI) Enterprises and German Hidden Champion Enterprises. , 2026(1): 149-160.
[1]杨张博,韩淑君,孙笑明,等.中美AIGC领先企业技术创新布局比较研究[J].科学学研究,2024(6):1-22. [2]曾宪聚,曾凯,任慧,等.专精特新企业成长研究:综述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2024,46(1):62-76. [3]SIMON H.Hidden champions:Lessons from 500 of the world's best unknown companies[M].Boston:Harvard Business Press,1996. [4]王金凤,张芷芯,冯立杰,等.基于LDA与共现网络动态分析的技术机会识别[J].科研管理,2024,45(2):176-188. [5]冉从敬,李旺,黄文俊.高校高价值专利技术机会识别研究:以“生成式人工智能”领域为例[J].信息资源管理学报,2024,14(4):103-116. [6]衣春波,胡梦雅,许鑫.专利视角下集成电路企业技术创新合作网络演化分析[J].现代情报,2023,43(5):79-89. [7]娄岩,王雪婷,黄鲁成,等.基于专利的北京市老龄产业研究[J].情报杂志,2016,35(1):45-50. [8]张娴,许海云,方曙,等.专利技术组合机会与合作潜力研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34(7):39-46. [9]韩洪灵,彭瑶,刘强.技术进步与就业增长并存:基于专精特新“小巨人”企业认定政策的研究[J].科学学研究,2024(4):1-19. [10]陈金勇,汪小池,长昊东,等.专精特新认定政策与中小企业技术创新[J].科研管理,2024,45(3):20-30. [11]曹虹剑,张帅,欧阳峣,等.创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J].中国工业经济,2022(11):135-154. [12]丁建军,王淀坤,刘贤.长三角地区专精特新“小巨人”企业空间分布及影响因素研究[J].地理研究,2023,42(4):1009-1028. [13]丁建军,刘贤,王淀坤,等.国家级专精特新“小巨人”企业空间分布及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2022,42(10):109-118. [14]张延平,王满四,黄敬伟,等.专精特新企业成长与培育的研究回顾与未来研究展望[J].科学决策,2024(2):155-175. [15]王瑶,曾德明,李健,等.桥接科学家创始人与企业技术创新绩效:基于专精特新“小巨人”企业的分析[J].科学学研究,2023,41(9):1690-1701. [16]西蒙.隐形冠军:未来全球化的先锋[M].张帆,吴君,刘慧宇,等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2015. [17]SIMON H.Hidden champions of the twenty-first century:The success strategies of unknown world market leaders[M].New York:Springer Science & Business Media,2009. [18]AUDRETSCH D,LEHMANN E,SCHENKENHOFER J,et al.Internationalization strategies of hidden champions:Lessons from Germany[J].Multinational Business Review,2018,26(1):2-24. [19]张各兴.中国式隐形冠军培育:位势跃迁、能力进阶与政策建议:基于中小企业梯度培育体系与德国隐形冠军的比较分析[J].财政科学,2023(11):84-97. [20]蒋瑜洁,史浥衡,王尚可.中国隐形冠军技术创新的多元或聚焦之路:基于中日新能源汽车电池领域专利对比分析[J].软科学,2024(6):1-12. [21]MICHIE S,VAN STRALEN M,WEST R.The behaviour change wheel:A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions[J].Implementation Science,2011,6(1):42. [22]李洪晨,尹召凯,张志强.从搜索引擎式到对话式:基于COM-B模型的用户信息搜寻转移行为影响因素研究[J].现代情报,2025,45(5):66-76. [23]曹艺,何斐.基于COM-B模型的公共图书馆老年人阅读服务研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2025(S1):53-60. [24]伍伦.数字化转型对公司税收遵从的影响研究[J].外国经济与管理,2023,45(8):17-33,50. [25]孟晓平,张志勇.基于COM-B理论的青少年体育行为影响要素体系及其作用路径研究[J].体育学研究,2022,36(6):23-31,43. [26]KEYWORTH C,EPTON T,GOLDTHORPE J,et al.Acceptability,reliability,and validity of a brief measure of capabilities,opportunities,and motivations(“COM-B”)[J].British Journal of Health Psychology,2020,25(3):474-501. [27]尹聪慧.碳捕集与封存技术创新合作机理及路径研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2019. [28]杨曦,余翔,刘鑫.基于多层视角模型的专利情报分析方法研究:以石墨烯技术为例[J].情报杂志,2018,37(8):64-70. [29]陈悦,谭建国,王智琦,等.专利视角下工业机器人领域的技术机会分析[J].科研管理,2018,39(4):144-156.
2026, 
