A Driving Mode of Lean Production Innovation of Manufacturing Enterprises Based on Green Finance,Digital Twins and Digital Carbon Resilience
Liu Qiang1, Fan Minnan1, Chu Zhujie2, Li Xiaodi3
1. School of Business Administration,University of Science and Technology Liaoning,Anshan 114051,China; 2. School of International and Public affairs,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China; 3. School of Economics and Management,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China
Abstract：Under carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals and digital transformation,lean production innovation of manufacturing enterprises has shifted from just cutting costs and improving processes toward coordinated efficiency improvement,low-carbon response and production system reconstruction.This study used TOE framework and uses A-share manufacturing listed companies in financial reform and development pilot zones from 2017 to 2024 as the sample.It incorporates green finance,digital twins and digital carbon resilience into an integrated analytical framework,applies LASSO model and entropy method to screen and integrate antecedent conditions,and uses NCA-fsQCA to identify necessary conditions and driving modes.The results show that the quality,performance and value of digital twins model are stable bottleneck conditions.Four equivalent paths are identified:digital-financial synergy,digital twins' agility,environment-value synergy and environment-quality synergy.Digital carbon resilience supports multiple paths,while environmental,technological,and organizational conditions show complementary and compensatory relationships.There is no single optimal path for high-level lean production innovation;instead,it depends on combinations of antecedent conditions and their adaptability to manufacturing scenarios.This paper extends the research at the intersection of lean production and digital transformation.The findings provide theoretical basis and practical implications for manufacturing enterprises with different resource endowments to choose suitable green digital transformation paths.
刘强, 范敏楠, 褚祝杰, 李晓娣. 基于绿色金融—数字孪生—数字碳韧性的制造企业精益生产创新的驱动模式[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(7): 87-96.
Liu Qiang, Fan Minnan, Chu Zhujie, Li Xiaodi. A Driving Mode of Lean Production Innovation of Manufacturing Enterprises Based on Green Finance,Digital Twins and Digital Carbon Resilience. , 2026(7): 87-96.
[1] 张明超,孙新波,王永霞.数据赋能驱动精益生产创新内在机理的案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2021,24(3):102-116. [2] 徐嘉祺,李凤荣,刘雯.绿色金融对企业漂绿风险的影响研究[J/OL].工程管理科技前沿,2025[2026-05-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/34.1336.N.20251201.1839.005 [3] 冯晗,郭琨,王珏.绿色金融体系政策对绿色企业全要素生产率的影响[J/OL].系统工程理论与实践,2025 [2026-05-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2267.N.20251009.0913.004 [4] 俞中,佟孟华,赵江山.排污许可监管、绿色金融创新与企业信贷融资[J].世界经济,2025,48(5):89-127. [5] 潘蓉蓉,罗建强,杨子超.数字技术赋能制造企业服务化转型:理论分析与展望[J].系统工程理论与实践,2023,43(11):3110-3128. [6] 霍达,顾雯嘉,郭冬梅,等.新能源充电基础设施与低碳城市发展:基于数字孪生的城市空间规划[J/OL].中国管理科学,2025 [2026-05-18].https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2025.0470 [7] 何怀文,叶宣含.数字孪生视角下的工业数据配置及流动规则[J].中国科技论坛,2025(7):77-85. [8] 丁珈,周炜,张永,等.数字孪生驱动的装备全寿命周期智能运维技术进展与展望[J].系统工程理论与实践,2025,45(6):1828-1845. [9] 罗均梅,徐翠丰,王水莲.数字孪生如何影响企业创新生态系统价值共创？基于可供性视角的案例研究[J].研究与发展管理,2025,37(1):60-73. [10] 梁林,冉悦涵.碳韧性、数字化转型与高碳排放企业成长绩效[J].技术经济,2025,44(10):73-88. [11] 梁林,郭悦雯.高碳排制造业发展质量提升研究:基于碳韧性的新思路[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(19):67-78. [12] 王宛秋,王雪晴,刘晓燕,等.基于 TOE 框架的企业跨界技术并购绩效的提升策略研究:一项模糊集的定性比较分析[J].南开管理评论,2022,25(2):136-148. [13] Benchis M P,Shahzad K,Dan S.Comparative analysis of blockchain adoption in the public and private sectors:a technology-organization-environment framework approach[J].Journal of Innovation & Knowledge,2025,10(4):100746. [14] Hughes L,Davies F,Li K,et al.Beyond the hype:organisational adoption of generative AI through the lens of the TOE framework-A mixed methods perspective[J].International Journal of Information Management,2026(86):102982. [15] 周莉清,张卫国,陈蕴琦.数字化转型与乡村旅游企业组织韧性:基于ESG绩效的路径考察[J/OL].管理学刊,2026[2026-05-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/41.1408.F.20260403.1216.006 [16] 刘春红,郄可心,鲍子文.人工智能技术应用如何提升组织韧性[J].经济管理,2026,48(3):145-169. [17] 李武威,刘洋豪,曹勇.数字普惠金融、动态能力与创业企业成长绩效[J].管理评论,2026,38(2):135-148. [18] 王峣鹏,张悦,向子威,等.多元动态能力视角下逆全球化与企业绿色创新:逆流而上还是顺势而为[J/OL].科学学与科学技术管理,2026 [2026-05-18].https://doi.org/10.20201/j.cnki.ssstm.20260210.002 [19] 梁中,张建军.面向新质生产力发展的企业碳管理变革[J].改革,2025(12):89-99. [20] 梁毅,刘涵,方焱,等.中国物流低碳韧性时空分异、网络结构特征与其驱动机制[J/OL].世界地理研究,2025 [2026-05-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1626.p.20250825.1617.002 [21] Ivanov D.Digital supply chain management and technology to enhance resilience by building and using end-to-end visibility during the COVID-19 pandemic[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2021(71):10485-10495. [22] 任亚运,刘亚茹,胡常帅,等.绿色新生:绿色金融对新质生产力的影响及作用机制研究[J].软科学,2026,40(4):80-88. [23] 唐亮,杨国玉.绿色金融改革创新政策对新质生产力的影响研究[J].管理评论,2025,37(11):167-180. [24] 唐书香,张清俊,唐哲,等.绿色金融改革能否促进绿色创业:基于企业注册大数据的证据[J].财经论丛,2026,42(1):76-88. [25] 王茜雯,徐国庆.培养大国工匠:教育强国背景下工匠技术创新研究[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2026,44(4):66-78. [26] 刘新韬,邓新明,张亦驰,等.“重利润”还是“重增长”?新兴市场企业战略导向对企业绿色创新的影响研究 [J/OL].外国经济与管理,2026 [2026-05-18].https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20260310.401. [27] 李小胜,胡建炳,宋马林.知识产权保护、环境规制协同对企业绿色创新的影响研究[J/OL].科研管理,2026 [2026-05-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1567.G3.20260421.1454.002. [28] 薛博文,冯宗宪.中国区域绿色金融发展评估[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2024,44(6):44-61. [29] 张辰源,陶飞.数字孪生模型评价指标体系[J].计算机集成制造系统,2021,27(8):2171-2186. [30] 杨贵军,王伟科,杨雪.含 LASSO 约束的双重稳健估计量及应用[J].统计与决策,2026,42(2):24-30. [31] 阮荣彬,朱祖平,陈莞.中国企业科技向善水平评价体系构建与实证研究[J].中国科技论坛,2024(3):120-131. [32] 杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度？基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155. [33] Dul J.Necessary condition analysis(NCA):logic and methodology of necessary but not sufficient causality[J].Organizational Research Methods,2016,19(1):10-52. [34] 施宇,王杰祥,盛亚,等.专利平台驱动的企业创新模式:基于38家高新技术企业的组态分析[J].南开管理评论,2024,27(1):87-97. [35] 李礼旭,黄光于,杨水利.数字化与服务化对制造企业绩效的联动效应研究:基于模糊集定性比较分析[J].南开管理评论,2023,27(10):1-23. [36] 余辉,夏文蕾,黄炜,等.基于文本匹配组态优化的两阶段技术供需匹配方法研究[J].情报学报,2024,43(3):261-273.
2026, 
