Abstract：In the Fourth Industrial Revolution,the change of production mode and the development of digital twins are jointly defining the normative direction for establishing rules of industrial data allocation and circulation:to promote the sharing,integration,and collaborative use of full life cycle industrial data.The sharing,integration and collaborative use of full life cycle industrial data based on digital twins is a highly productive way of using data,which can fully release the potential value of industrial data and fully empower industrial transformation and upgrading.However,the current scattered distribution and stagnant flow of industrial data,as well as the fact that producers and operators have too much dispersed de facto control over industrial data,have made it difficult to share,integrate and collaboratively use industrial data.This situation has thereby triggered the“tragedy of the anticommons”in the use of industrial data.In this regard,China should build a set of rules of industrial data allocation and circulation that are compatible with the sharing,integration and collaborative use of full life cycle industrial data.In terms of data allocation rules,the prior data collectors will enjoy the limited property interest of controlling industrial data,while the state will have the power to integrate data granted by the people.In terms of data circulation rules,the“new pathways”for the industrial data flow will be established based on allocation rules,in addition to free market transactions.The combination of allocation and circulation rules will reduce transaction costs,balance the interests of all parties involved,and ultimately promote the sharing,integration and collaborative use of industrial data.
何怀文, 叶宣含. 数字孪生视角下的工业数据配置及流动规则[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(7): 77-85.
He Huaiwen, Ye Xuanhan. The Rules of Industrial Data Allocation and Circulation from the Perspective of Digital Twins. , 2025(7): 77-85.
[1]工业和信息化部办公厅.工业和信息化部办公厅关于印发《工业数据分类分级指南(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].(2020-02-27)[2025-01-23].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-03/07/content_5488251.htm. [2]杨琴.数字经济时代数据流通利用的数权激励[J].政治与法律, 2021(12):12-25. [3]陶飞, 张贺, 戚庆林,等.数字孪生十问:分析与思考[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2020(1):1-17. [4]GRIEVES M, VICKERS J.Digital twin:Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems[J].Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems:New findings and approaches, 2017:85-113. [5]马俊驹, 梅夏英.财产权制度的历史评析和现实思考[J].中国社会科学, 1999(1):90-105. [6]Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy.Aspects of the research roadmap in application scenarios[EB/OL].(2016-04-01)[2025-01-23].https://assomac.it/media/documents/aspects-of-the-research-roadmap.pdf. [7]彭慧.理解工业4.0的新视角:应用场景[EB/OL].(2019-05-25)[2025-01-23].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1634430943318825872&wfr=spider&for=pc. [8]庄存波, 刘检华, 熊辉,等.产品数字孪生体的内涵、体系结构及其发展趋势[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2017(4):753-768. [9]BUCHANAN J M, YOON Y J.Symmetric tragedies:Commons and anticommons[J].The Journal of Law and Economics, 2000(1):1-14. [10]HARDIN G.The tragedy of the commons:The population problem has no technical solution;it requires a fundamental extension in morality[J].Science, 1968(3859):1243-1248. [11]HELLER M A.The tragedy of the anticommons:Property in the transition from Marx to markets[J].Harvard Law Review, 1998(3):621-688. [12]赵震江, 周旺生, 张骐,等.论法律实效[J].中外法学, 1989(2):1-7. [13]高富平.数据生产理论:数据资源权利配置的基础理论[J].交大法学, 2019(4):5-19. [14]斯宾诺莎.神学政治论[M].温锡增,译.北京:商务印书馆, 2014:214-216. [15]郑戈.数据法治与未来交通:自动驾驶汽车数据治理刍议[J].中国法律评论, 2022(1):202-214. [16]WindEurope.Joint declaration on aspects related to the upcoming EU Action Plan on digitalizing the energy sector[EB/OL].(2022-06-23)[2025-01-23].https://windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/policy/position-papers/20220623-WindEurope-joint-declaration-upcoming-eu-action-plan-on-digitalising-the-energy-sector.pdf. [17]European Parliament.Regulation(EC)No 715/2007 of the European parliament and of the council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles(Euro 5 and Euro 6)[EB/OL].(2007-06-20)[2025-01-23].https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2007/715/body/data.pdf. [18]沈斌.论公共数据的认定标准与类型体系[J].行政法学研究, 2023(4):64-76. [19]刘冰.我国能源数据安全法律规制研究[J].政法论坛, 2023(2):48-59. [20]叶宣含.数据自由和算法保护[J].理论月刊, 2022(7):110-124.
2025, 
