Quantitative Research and Implications of Government Open Data Security Governance Policies at Home and Abroad ——Based on the“Goal-Tool-Cycle”Three-dimensional Analysis Framework
Ran Lian, Wu Mingyang
School of of Law and Sociology,Xihua University,Chengdu 610039,China
Abstract：Based on a three-dimensional analytical framework of“objectives-tools-cycles,”this study employs content analysis and policy network analysis to systematically examine elements such as subjects,themes,tools,and network structures across 181 domestic and international policy texts.Findings reveal that international policies emerged earlier with broader coverage,emphasizing technology-driven approaches and multi-stakeholder collaboration while prioritizing individual privacy protection.Domestic policies,though launched later,have grown rapidly under government leadership,focusing on data management standards and information system integration.Regarding policy objectives,domestic frameworks emphasize national security while international ones prioritize individual privacy rights.In terms of policy instruments,domestic approaches favor environmental tools,whereas international ones lean toward supply-side tools.Both domestically and internationally,mid-cycle security governance for open data is emphasized throughout the lifecycle.Policy network analysis indicates that domestic policies exhibit a comprehensive governance orientation,while international policies lean toward targeted governance models.Based on these findings,this study proposes actionable recommendations to enhance China's government open data security governance policy framework.These recommendations address policy philosophy,participatory mechanisms in policy formulation,the effectiveness of combined policy tools,and the establishment of a policy support system for data governance across its entire lifecycle.
冉连, 吴铭洋. 国内外政府开放数据安全治理政策量化研究与启示——基于“目标-工具-周期”三维分析框架[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(12): 164-176.
Ran Lian, Wu Mingyang. Quantitative Research and Implications of Government Open Data Security Governance Policies at Home and Abroad ——Based on the“Goal-Tool-Cycle”Three-dimensional Analysis Framework. , 2025(12): 164-176.
[1]中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革 推进中国式现代化的决定[N].人民日报,2024-07-2(001). [2]复旦大学数字与移动治理实验室.中国地方公共数据开放利用报告:城市(2024年度)[R/OL].(2024-09-26)[2024-09-28].http://ifopendata.fudan.edu.cn/report. [3]朱益平,金悦,樊丽珍.我国公共数字文化服务政策主题变迁与文本量化研究[J].图书馆建设,2024(1):74-86. [4]KULK S,LOENEN B V .Brave new open data world?[J].International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research,2012(7):196-206. [5]YOUNG M M.Implementation of Digital-Era Governance:The case of open data in U.S.cities[J].Public Administration Review,2020(1):305-315. [6]夏义堃.论政府开放数据风险与风险管理[J].情报学报,2017(1):18-27. [7]庄国波,韩惠.5G时代政府开放数据共享的安全风险及防范[J].理论探讨,2020(5):48-54. [8]KSHETRI N.Big datas impact on privacy,security and consumer welfare[J].Telecommunications Policy,2014(11):1134-1145. [9]KOO J,KANG G,KIM Y G.Security and privacy in big data life cycle:A survey and open challenges[J].Sustainability,2020(24):10571. [10]黄如花,苗淼.中国政府开放数据的安全保护对策[J].电子政务,2017(5):28-36. [11]NUGROHO R P,ZUIDERWIJK A,JANSSEN M,et al.A comparison of national open data policies:Lessons learned[J].Transforming Government:People,Process and Policy,2015(3):286-308. [12]HARDY K,MAURUSHAT A.Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit[J].Computer Law & Security Review,2017(33):30-37. [13]LOURENS R P,PIOTROWSKI S,INGRAMS A.Open data driven public accountability[J].Transforming Government People Process&Policy,2017(1):42-57. [14]ZUIDERWIJK A,JANSSEN M,CHOENNI S,et al.Design principles for improving theprocess of publishing open data[J].Transforming Government:People,Process and Policy,2014(2):185-204. [15]商希雪,韩海庭.政府开放数据中个人信息保护路径研究[J].电子政务,2021(6):113-124. [16]中国行政管理学会课题组,鲍静,贾凌民,等.我国政府开放数据顶层设计研究[J].中国行政管理,2016(11):6-12. [17]YANG Z B,KANKANHALLI A,HA S,et al.What drives public agencies to participate in open government data initiatives?An innovation resource perspective[J].Information&Management,2020(3):103179. [18]刘文云,岳丽欣,马伍翠,等.政府开放数据保障机制在数据质量控制中的应用研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018(4):21-27. [19]王标,刘兴洋,许卡,等.政府开放数据的国家安全风险评估模型研究[J].网络与信息安全学报,2020(6):80-87. [20]马海群,张涛,易扬.开放数据与数据安全的政策协同度研究[J].文献与数据学报,2020(1):23-33. [21]冉连,张曦.地方政府开放数据中的数据安全政策研究:基于全国33个地级市政策文本的内容分析[J].情报杂志,2020(11):96-103. [22]完颜邓邓,宋婷.我国地方政府开放数据平台的安全风险测评[J].图书馆论坛,2022(2):119-128. [23]单菲菲.政策工具视角下的城乡社区治理政策研究:以《关于加强和完善城乡社区治理的意见》为例[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2020(4):87-94. [24]洪闯,李中明,徐金藤.我国老年人健康信息服务政策量化研究与启示:基于“工具—目标—主体”三维分析框架[J].现代情报,2024(8):99-109. [25]沙勇忠,陆莉.公共安全数据管理:新领域与新方向[J].图书与情报,2019(4):1-12. [26]冉连,张曦.省级政府开放数据中数据安全管理绩效的影响因素:基于20个省级政府样本的定性比较分析[J].情报科学,2022(6):59-65,81. [27]王漪,何隆,符昱,等.基于数据生命周期的海洋科学数据安全治理框架研究[J].热带海洋学报,2025(2):208-214. [28]段尧清,姜慧,汤弘昊.政府开放数据全生命周期:概念、模型与结构:系统论视角[J].情报理论与实践,2019(5):35-40,50. [29]杜国强.信息生命周期管理[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,2004. [30]HERNON P.Information life cycle:Its place in the management of U.S.government inlormation resources[J].Government Information Quarterly,1994,11(2):143-170. [31]ATTARD J,ORLANDI F,SCERRI S,et al.A systematic review of open government data initiatives[J].Government Information Quarterly,2015,32(4):399-418. [32]陈振明.公共政策分析[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002. [33]B·盖伊·彼得斯,弗兰斯·K·M·冯尼斯潘.公共政策工具:对公共管理工具的评价[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007. [34]HANSON E C,ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Industrial innovation and public policy:Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[J].American Political science Review,1981(3):699. [35]孟溦,王勰祎.基于二维分析视角的长三角城市群政府开放数据共享政策分析[J].电子政务,2020(3):82-90. [36]赵筱媛,苏竣.基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J].科学学研究,2007(1):52-56. [37]陈媛媛,林安洁,马海群.基于固定效应回归分析的省级公共数据政策对政府开放数据绩效的影响研究[J].情报学报,2024(7):875-888. [38]张晓娟,部闫若,莫富传.政策工具视角下我国地方政府公共数据治理政策研究[J].情报理论与实践,2024(6):21-30. [39]杨宏山.公共政策的价值目标与公正原则[J].中国行政管理,2004(8):87-90. [40]赵蕊菡,陈俊蕾,张潇月.“周期-工具-主体”协同视角下我国公共数据治理政策解析[J].情报资料工作,2024(5):51-63. [41]王志远,朱德全.职业教育服务乡村振兴政策的历史流变与时代趋向[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2021(10):66-75. [42]中华人民共和国数据安全法[N].人民日报,2021-06-19(007). [43]汪圣,刘旭青.政策工具视角下我国公共文化服务政策研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2018(2):16-22,27. [44]王丹丹,武金格.我国健康医疗大数据政策量化研究:基于“主题—工具—效力”三维框架的分析[J].图书情报工作,2025(7):16-27. [45]宋筱璇,王延飞,钟灿涛.国内外科研数据安全管理政策比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016(11):10-16. [46]冉连,吴铭洋.政府数据开放安全影响因素互作用框架的元综合分析[J].情报杂志,2024(10):199-207. [47]陈朝兵,郝文强.国外政府数据开放隐私影响评估的政策考察与启示:以美英澳新四国为例[J].情报资料工作,2019(5):23-30. [48]王译,李嘉飞.嵌入与转型:人工智能赋能国家监察的系统逻辑与治理之策[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2024(5):43-52. [49]华子岩.政府数据共享视域下首席数据官制度的确立及其风险防范[J].中国科技论坛,2023(9):109-117.
2025, 
