Abstract：How to improve the conversion rate of scientific and technological achievements in universities has always been a focal point of academic attention.Currently,most research on university technology transfer focuses on the correlation between investment in university scientific achievements and their commercialization,while neglecting the roles of participants such as researchers,transformation institutions,and universities,as well as their interactions under different circumstances.Against this backdrop,this study,based on Actor-Network Theory and employing fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis,conducts an in-depth investigation into the specific pathways and influencing factors of technology transfer among 50 Chinese universities.The findings reveal that although enhancing researchers' share in the benefits of technology transfer is significant,it is not a necessary condition for building an efficient technology transfer system.Instead,the core roles of various entities and their interactive mechanisms are more critical.Specific pathways include incentive-based transformation systems for researchers,balanced-driven transformation systems combining technology markets and researchers,dual-driven transformation systems involving both researchers and university technology transfer institutions,as well as venture capital market-driven systems with dual drivers from both technology transfer personnel and investors.Additionally,by analyzing practical models of technology transfer in universities across different regions and development stages,this study provides important references for universities to construct technology transfer systems tailored to their own characteristics.
韩凤芹, 杨小强. 中国高校科技成果转化主体组合效应研究——基于fsQCA模型分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(10): 16-24.
Han Fengqin, Yang Xiaoqiang. Combined Effect of the Main Body of Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation in Chinese Universities——Based on fsQCA Model Analysis. , 2025(10): 16-24.
[1] 魏志恒,杨望.从国际视角看我国科技成果转化[J].科技与金融,2021 (12):61-62. [2] 靳瑞杰,江旭.高校科技成果转化“路在何方”:基于过程性视角的转化渠道研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40 (12):35-57. [3] 李婷婷,刘鑫,陈光.高校科技成果“反公地悲剧”问题的突破机制:以职务发明权属改革为视角的分析[J].中国高校科技,2020 (7):89-93. [4] 章熙春,江海,袁传思.产权激励对促进高校科技成果转化的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40 (17):106-111. [5] BRESCIA F,COLOMBO G,LANDONI P.Organization-al structures of knowledge transfer offices:An analysis of the world's top-ranked universities[J].The Journal of technology transfer,2016,41 (1):132-151. [6] DONALD S,DAVID W,ALBER T.Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices:An exploratory study[J].Research Policy,2003,32 (1):27-48. [7] BENGTSSON L.Acomparison of university technology transfer office commercialization strategies in the Scandinavian countries[J].Science and Public Policy,2017,44 (4):565-577. [8] PITSAKIS K,GIACHET T.Information-based imitation of university commercialize-tion strategies:The role of technology transfer office autonomy,age,and member-ship into an association[J].Strategic Organization,2020,18 (4):573-616. [9] 纪红,张旭.科技成果转化基金:产学研协同创新的新范式[J].大连理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2022,43 (4):116-121. [10] 刘宏波,刘任,张颖.关于农业高校科研成果转化问题的思考[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51 (3):626-629. [11] 赵正洲,李玮.高校科技成果转化动力机制缺失及其对策[J].科技管理研究,2012,32 (15):133-136,141. [12] 杨京京,刘明军.高校科技成果转化机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2005 (8):128-129,133. [13] 吴杨,王媛,郑建荣,等.“双一流”建设大学科技成果转化效率测量:基于“十二五”至“十三五”期间数据观测[J].科学管理研究,2022,40 (2):49-56. [14] 薛雅,王雪莹.基于因子分析法的重大科技成果转化地域选择影响因素研究[J].科技管理研究,2023,43 (12):194-201. [15] 刘丹,闫长乐.协同创新网络结构与机理研究[J].管理世界,2013 (12):1-4. [16] 张顺,陈海鹏,张云化,等.科技成果转化共同体的构建模式研究[J].中国高校科技,2020 (3):4-7. [17] 陈艺丹,洪帅,田学斌.基于政企研三方博弈视角的科技成果转化主体行为策略研究[J].河北经贸大学学报,2023,44 (5):26-35. [18] 龚梅琳,刘静岩.高校科技成果转化绩效的组态效应与路径分析:基于中国31个地区的模糊集定性比较分析[J].科技管理研究,2024,44 (10):102-109. [19] 孙远钊.论科技成果转化与产学研合作:美国《拜杜法》35周年的回顾与展望[J].科技与法律,2015 (5):1008-1037. [20] RAMYA H,MANTHAN D.Factors affecting technology transfer and commercialization of university research in India:A cross-sectional study[J].Journal of the Knowledge Economy,2022,36 (13):787-803. [21] ETZK0WITZ H.The evolution of the entrepreneurial university[J].Int.J.Technol.Glob,2004,24 (1):64-77. [22] ETZK0WITZ H,EYDESORFF L.The dynamics of innovation:From national systems and“Mode 2”to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J].Res.Pol,2000,29 (2):109-123. [23] LUNDQVIST M A.The importance of surrogate entrepreneurship for incubated Swedish technology ventures[J].Technovation,2014,34 (2):93-100. [24] 沈培,李建清.行动者网络理论的研究热点和前沿趋势[J].自然辩证法通讯,2021,43 (11):117-126. [25] 左璜,黄甫全.行动者网络理论:教育研究的新视界[J].教育发展研究,2012,32 (4):15-19. [26] 王玮,郑石明.科技成果转化政策实施的网络分析:以西安光机所为例[J].科技管理研究,2021,41 (23):39-47. [27] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167. [28] 龚敏,江旭,高山行.如何分好“奶酪”? 基于过程视角的高校科技成果转化收益分配机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42 (6):141-163. [29] 胡凯,王炜哲.如何打通高校科技成果转化的“最后一公里”:基于技术转移办公室体制的考察[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40 (4):5-27. [30] 张明倩,冉美丽,孙艺菲.高校技术转移机构自主权对技术转移效果的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2024 (5):54-64. [31] 刘国新,张峰,张鹏飞,等.我国高校技术转移机构建设模式与策略选择[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39 (5):1-10. [32] 许可,张亚峰,肖冰.科学与市场间的边界组织:科技成果转化机构的理论拓展与实践创新[J].中国软科学,2021 (6):64-73. [33] 姚畅,杜伟,张超,等.科技成果转移转化人员收益分配模式的实践与探索:以对中国科学院15家院属单位调研为基础[J].中国科学院院刊,2024,39 (6):1060-1071. [34] 俞立平,吴思慈,张宏如.技术市场发展与高技术企业创新差距关系研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2022,37 (3):14-23. [35] FAN D,LI Y,CHEN L.Configuring innovative Societies:The cross vergent role of cultural and institutional Varieties[J].Technovation,2017,66 (9):43-67. [36] RAGIN C.Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2008. [37] FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy Set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal,2011,54 (2):393-420. [38] 杨小强.促进创业投资机构集聚的政策分析:以北京市海淀区为例[J].河北金融,2023 (6):3-9.
2025, 
