Implementation Path of Organized Research in the Field of Non-consensual Innovation——Based on the Case of the National Science Foundation of the United States
Zhao Hongmei1, Zhang Liwei2, Zhao Wenhua3
1. School of History and Culture of Science,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China; 2. Centre for Education Management Information,Ministry of Education,Beijing 100816,China; 3. School of Education,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China
Abstract：Non-consensual innovation is a key source of major breakthroughs in science and technology, and strengthening organized research in the field of non-consensual innovation is crucial to promoting high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and building a world power in science and technology.The article focuses on the implementation path of organized research in the field of non-consensus innovation, adopts the case study method, builds a macro-medium-micro analytical framework, and systematically compiles and analyzes the organizational and management practices of the U.S.National Science Foundation in the field of non-consensus innovation projects, with a view to providing references to China's scientific research management departments.The article proposes to improve the overall funding pattern of non-consensus innovation projects, construct a non-linear process management mechanism, lead the construction of a non-consensus innovation ecosystem, and expand the participation of postdoctoral fellows and doctoral students in the field of non-consensus innovation, which can provide theoretical and case study support for China's organized research in the field of non-consensus innovation, and help to produce prospective and disruptive innovations, and catalyze the development of new quality productivity.
赵宏媚, 张力玮, 赵文华. 非共识创新领域有组织科研实施路径研究——基于美国国家科学基金会案例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(10): 9-15.
Zhao Hongmei, Zhang Liwei, Zhao Wenhua. Implementation Path of Organized Research in the Field of Non-consensual Innovation——Based on the Case of the National Science Foundation of the United States. , 2025(10): 9-15.
[1] 陈良雨.非共识研究与高校原始创新能力提升[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38 (12):19-24. [2] ROSSONI A L, DE VASCONCELLOS E P, SBRAGIA R.Influence of social capital, market orientation, and technological readiness on researchers'interactions with companies[J].Future Business Journal,2024, 10 (69):1-21. [3] 束义明,苏宝利.中国基础研究原始性创新能力的现状及提高对策[J].科学管理研究,2002 (5):12-15. [4] 茹潇潇,李志兰.非共识基础研究项目资助政策研究[J].科学管理研究,2018,36 (6):41-44. [5] 李晓萌,赵英弘,郝红全,等.基础研究原始创新的政策探索:从非共识创新到原创探索计划[J].中国科学基金,2024,38 (2):320-327. [6] 中华人民共和国科学技术部.科技部办公厅、财政部办公厅、教育部办公厅、中科院办公厅、工程院办公厅、 自然科学基金委办公室关于印发《新形势下加强基础研究若干重点举措》的通知[EB/OL]. (2020-05-11)[2024-09-17].https://www.cas.cn/zcjd/202005/t20200512_4745744.shtml. [7] 中华人民共和国科学技术部.科技部、发展改革委、教育部、中科院、自然科学基金委关于印发《加强“从0到1”基础研究工作方案》的通知 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-03)[2024-09-20].https://www.cas.cn/zcjd/202003/t20200303_4736354.shtml. [8] 俞陶然.“四不像”非共识研究获得“逆袭”[N].解放日报2023-08-15 (001). [9] SCHUMPETER J A.Capitalism,socialism and democracy [M].New York:Harper & Row,1975. [10] TUSHMAN M L,NADLER D.Organizing for innovation[J].California Management Review,1986 (1):74-92. [11] HAMEL G.Leading the revolution[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2000. [12] 王勇,汪华登,唐成华.非共识项目的评审机制探讨与建议[J].中国科学基金,2012,26 (2):74-78. [13] 赵英弘,郝红全,李晓萌,等.国家自然科学基金资助原创性基础研究的启示:基于原创探索计划试点实施的案例研究[J].中国软科学,2023 (10):9-20. [14] 西桂权.科技悬赏在非共识项目中的应用研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (3):16-23. [15] 鲍锦涛,郑毅,彭一杰,等.原创性基础研究的内涵分析及对原创探索计划项目的启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37 (3):384-394. [16] 刘文波,钮晓鸣.非共识项目的立项决策研究[J].上海管理科学,2017,39 (4):61-65. [17] 贾宝余,陈套,刘立.科技自立自强视域下科技政策的转变:从追赶型到引领型[J].中国科技论坛,2022 (6):11-18. [18] 李胜会,李丹.从共识到非共识:基础研究成果评价方式创新[J].自然辩证法研究,2023,39 (11):95-104.. [19] 刘钒,李小敏.基础研究中非共识项目的资助问题研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2022,44 (3):70-81. [20] 白坤朝,詹世革.国家自然科学基金项目风险与创新的特点及相关思考[J].中国科学基金,2018,32 (2):156-160. [21] 孙文静.基于五种新型科研组织模式的科技监督新范式初探[J].科学管理研究,2022,40 (2):57-64. [22] YIN R K.Case study research:Design and methods (4th ed.)[M].Washington DC:Sage,2009. [23] JACOBSSON S, JOHNSON A.The diffusion of renewable energy technology:An analytical framework and key issues for research[J].Energy Policy,2000,28 (9):625-640. [24] 赵红光,阎维杰.中国转型期的特点及其对有组织科技活动的影响[J].中国软科学,2001 (11):86-90. [25] NSF.About NSF[EB/OL]. (2025-01-23)[2025-04-07].https://www.nsf.gov/about. [26] NSF.Proposal and award policies and procedures guide[EB/OL]. (2014-02-24)[2025-02-13].https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf14001/aagprint.pdf. [27] NSF.Award,administration and monitoring of NSF assistance awards[EB/OL]. (2024-10-13)[2025-03-02].https://www.nsf.gov/policies/pappg/24-1/ch-6-nsf-awards. [28] NSF.How we make funding decisions[EB/OL]. (2024-12-20)[2025-02-26].https://www.nsf.gov/funding/merit-review. [29] NSF.Overview of the NSF Proposal and Award Process[EB/OL]. (2024-12-23)[2025-03-14].https://www.nsf.gov/funding/overview. [30] NSF.Navajo Technical University partners with NSF center, creating new opportunities in materials research and education[EB/OL]. (2024-05-24)[2025-03-16].https://www.nsf.gov/news/navajo-technical-university-partners-nsf-center. [31] NSF.NSF materials research science and engineering centers[EB/OL]. (2024-08-10)[2025-04-01].https://www.nsf.gov/mps/dmr/materials-research-science-engineering-centers. [32] NSF.Science and technology centers:Integrative Partnerships[EB/OL]. (2024-08-21)[2025-04-02].https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/ia/stc. [33] NSF.New science and technology centers to address vexing societal problems[EB/OL]. (2021-09-09)[2025-01-20].https://www.nsf.gov/news/new-science-technology-centers-address-vexing. [34] NSF.Ideas Labs to advance research capacity at the nation's historically Black colleges and universities[EB/OL]. (2024-09-12)[2025-02-15].https://www.nsf.gov/news/ideas-labs-advance-research-capacity-nations-historically. [35] NSF.Ideas Lab:Personalized engineering learning[EB/OL]. (2023-09-26)[2025-03-23].https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/etaus-ideas-lab-engineering-technologies-advance-underwater/506083/nsf23-627.
2025, 
