From Boundary Spanning to Mission Achievement:A Study on the Organizational Identification Mechanism of Double Employed Personnel in Nationwide Key Laboratories
Zhou Xiangyu1, Wu Wei1, Xin Yueyou2
1. College of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China; 2. Research Center for Regional Coordinated Development,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China
Abstract：Nationwide Key Laboratories gather innovative resources on a large scale,cross disciplinary and organizational boundaries,and undertake grand innovation missions.As the main body of personnel,the degree of organizational recognition of double employed personnel directly determines the degree of achievement of the innovation mission of Nationwide Key Laboratory,so this issue is fundamental in platform governance.Aiming at the existing research gap,this article uses the boundary spanning theory and the comparative analysis method of dual cases to explore the basic process of promoting the formation of organizational identity among dual employed personnel in Nationwide Key Laboratory.Research has found that this process can be divided into three stages named as goal traction,boundary spanning,and mission effectiveness,and presents basic characteristics of independence,wide span,and intensification in institutional design.Among them,basic research laboratory focus on building an academic community oriented organizational identity model,while applied basic research laboratory focus on forming an innovative hub oriented organizational identity model.This study enriches the theory of boundary spanning,and has policy reference value for the optimization,reorganization and internal construction of Nationwide Key Laboratory.
[1]GEIGER R L.Organized research units——their role in the development of university research[J].The Journal of Higher Education,1990,61(1):1-19. [2]尹西明,陈劲,贾宝余.高水平科技自立自强视角下国家战略科技力量的突出特征与强化路径[J].中国科技论坛,2021(9):1-9. [3]鲁世林.高校国家重点实验室高层次人才对青年教师科研产出的影响研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2019. [4]ASHFORTH B E,HARRISON S H,CORLEY K G.Identification in organizations:an examination of four fundamental questions[J].Journal of Management,2008,34:325-374. [5]刘选会,张丽,钟定国.高校科研人员自我认同与组织认同和科研绩效的关系研究[J].高教探索,2019(1):17-23. [6]科技部.关于加强国家重点实验室建设发展的若干意见[EB/OL].(2018-06-22)[2023-05-11].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5442073.htm. [7]李昊,徐源.国家使命:美国国家实验室科技创新[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2021. [8]樊春良.美国国家实验室的建立和发展——对美国能源部国家实验室的历史考察[J].科学与社会,2022,12(2):18-42,62. [9]ASHFORTH B E,MAEL F.Social identity theory and the organization[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14(1):20-39. [10]黄振羽,丁云龙.激励结构冲突、历史机遇与制度变革——美国依托大学建立国家实验室的启示[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(2):30-34. [11]聂继凯,危怀安.国家实验室建设过程及关键因子作用机理研究——以美国能源部17所国家实验室为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):50-58. [12]文少保,杨连生.美国大学代管的国家实验室:委托代理、控制能力与治理机制选择[J].社会科学管理与评论,2010(2):73-79,112. [13]於荣.有组织研究单位的发展及其对美国研究型大学的影响[J].清华大学教育研究,2011,32(4):86-91. [14]RICHTER A W,WEST M A,DICK R V,et al.Boundary spanners’ identification,intergroup contact,and effective intergroup relations[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(6):1252-1269. [15]WILLIAMS P.The competent boundary spanner[J].Public Administration,2002,80(1):103-124. [16]BEDNAREK A T,WYBORN C,CVITANOVICC C,et al.Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface:the practitioners’ perspectives[J].Sustainability Science,2018,13(4):1175-1183. [17]YANG X,CAI X,LI T.Peer effects of the young returnee scientists:evidence from the state key laboratories in China[J].Science and Public Policy,2022,49(5):739-750. [18]TUSHMAN M L.Special boundary roles in the innovation process[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1977,22(4):587. [19]MELKERS J,XIAO F.Boundary-spanning in emerging technology research:determinants of funding success for academic scientists[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2012,37(3):251-270. [20]IDEN J,METHLIE L B,CHRISTENSEN G E.The nature of strategic foresight research:a systematic literature review[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017,116(3):87-97. [21]CUNNINGHAM J,O’REILLY P,O’KANE C,et al.The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2014,39(1):93-110. [22]ABREU M,GRINEVICH V.The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK:widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities[J].Research Policy,2013,42(2):408-422. [23]O’KANE C,MANGEMATIN V,ZHANG J A,et al.How university-based principal investigators shape a hybrid role identity[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020,159:150-179. [24]郭碧坚,李少文.国家重点实验室高效运行的一种组织模式[J].科研管理,1996(4):48-53. [25]聂继凯,危怀安.国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程研究:基于C国家重点实验室的案例剖析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(2):13-18. [26]冯伟波,周源,周羽.国家实验室技术转移模式与影响因素的研究进展综述[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(10):79-84. [27]李霞,董易,梁月.美国依托大学建设的世界级实验室管理运行机制研究——以国家实验室为例[J].实验技术与管理,2020,37(7):278-284. [28]谢辉祥.构建以“学域”为基础的交叉学科枢纽:国家实验室建设带来的新机遇[J].科教发展研究,2022,2(3):79-100. [29]LIU Y,MEYER K E.Boundary spanners,HRM practices,and reverse knowledge transfer:the case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions[J].Journal of World Business,2020,55(2):100958. [30]PETTIGREW,ANDREW M.Longitudinal field research on change:theory and practice[J].Organization Science,1990,1(3):267-292. [31]EISENHARDT K M.Building Theories from case study research[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):532-550. [32]毛基业,陈诚.案例研究的理论构建:艾森哈特的新洞见——第十届“中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2016)”会议综述[J].管理世界,2017(2):135-141. [33]卞松保,柳卸林.国家实验室的模式、分类和比较:基于美国、德国和中国的创新发展实践研究[J].管理学报,2011,8(4):567-576. [34]毛基业.运用结构化的数据分析方法做严谨的质性研究——中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2019)综述[J].管理世界,2020,36(3):221-227. [35]GIOIA D A,CORLEY K G,HAMILTON A L.Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research:notes on the Gioia methodology[J].Organizational Research Methods,2013,16(1):15-31. [36]鲁世林,杨希.高层次人才对青年教师的科研产出有何影响:基于45所国家重点实验室的实证研究[J].中国高教研究,2019(12):84-90,98. [37]王婉娟,危怀安.内部创新网络对协同创新能力的影响机理:基于国家重点实验室的实证研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(1):143-152. [38]聂继凯.国家实验室研究领域富化机理研究——以劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室为例[J].中国科技论坛,2022(8):49-57. [39]王晓飞,郑晓齐.美国研究型大学国家实验室经费来源及构成[J].中国高教研究,2012(12):56-59. [40]吴悦,顾新.产学研协同创新的知识协同过程研究[J].中国科技论坛,2012(10):17-23. [41]杨超,危怀安.政策助推、创新搜索机制对科研绩效的影响:基于国家重点实验室的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(9):1651-1659.
2024, 
