Abstract：The competition among large countries in science and technology,represented by artificial intelligence (AI),increasingly takes on the color of technological politics,and technological power has become the exogenous driving force for the innovation ecosystem of artificial intelligence.This paper adopts a longitudinal case study method to systematically deconstruct the evolution process of the US AI innovation ecosystem and explore the evolution mechanism of the AI innovation ecosystem driven by technological power.The research findings are as follows.①The competition in AI technology follows an evolutionary path of“material resource control-market network shaping-institutional rule monopoly”,corresponding to the iterative transformation of technological power from material type to network type and ultimately to institutional type.②Under the triple drive of technological power,the evolution of the AI innovation ecosystem has undergone two leaps from the AI technological innovation ecosystem to the AI industrial innovation ecosystem and the AI national innovation ecosystem,with the roles of the government and the market waxing and waning,forming an evolutionary trajectory of“government guidance-government-enterprise collaboration-market dominance”.③The evolution of the AI innovation ecosystem is jointly influenced by the innovation mechanism and the governance mechanism,and there is a synergy between the innovation mechanism and the governance mechanism.
卢超, 丁佳豪, 阳莹. 技术权力驱动下人工智能创新生态系统的演化机理研究——以美国为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(10): 168-179.
Lu Chao, Ding Jiahao, Yang Ying. The Evolution Mechanism of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Ecosystem Driven by Technological Power:Evidence from the United States of America. , 2025(10): 168-179.
[1] Whoever leads in AI will rule the world:Putin to Russian children on Knowledge Day[EB/OL]. (2017-09-01)[2025-03-02].https://www.rt.com/news/401731-ai-rule-world-putin/. [2] 魏钰明,贾开,曾润喜,等.DeepSeek突破效应下的人工智能创新发展与治理变革[J].电子政务,2025 (3):2-39. [3] HEDGECOCK K,KUNERTOVA D,MACDONALD T,et al.Emerging technology and strategy[J].Defence Studies,2024,24 (1):133-140. [4] 宫云牧.技术权力视角下的中美欧人工智能技术竞争[J].欧洲研究,2025,43 (1):24-52,165,6. [5] 赵程程,丁佳豪,杨萌.基于专利情报的人工智能技术创新联合体识别及其结构特征分析[J].情报杂志,2023,42 (10):163-169. [6] 部彦君.人工智能发展下的权力扩散态势解析与挑战应对[J].科学学研究,2025,43 (3):608-616. [7] 张治河,高中一.人工智能产业创新生态系统模型的构建与分析[J].科研管理,2023,44 (10):10-21. [8] 李小鹏,杨洋,桂黄宝,等.科技自立自强生态系统:系统重构、靶向催化及赶超机制[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44 (7):3-20. [9] 尹西明,苏雅欣,陈泰伦,等.场景驱动型人工智能创新生态系统:逻辑与进路[J].中国科技论坛,2024 (6):35-45. [10] KENNEDY A B,LIM D J.The innovation imperative:Technology and US-China rivalry in the twenty-first century[J].International Affairs,2018,94 (3):553-572. [11] 张倩雨.技术权力、技术生命周期与大国的技术政策选择[J].外交评论 (外交学院学报),2022,39 (1):59-88,6. [12] 周念利,吴希贤.中美数字技术权力竞争:理论逻辑与典型事实[J].当代亚太,2021 (6):78-101,167-168. [13] 薛澜,贾开,赵静.人工智能敏捷治理实践:分类监管思路与政策工具箱构建[J].中国行政管理,2024,40 (3):99-110. [14] RAND Corporation.Maintaining the competitive advantage in Artificial Intelligence and machine learning[R/OL]. (2020-07-13)[2025-02-19].https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA200-1.html [15] 沈志锋,李静,李智慧.人工智能参与下的创新生态系统构建研究[J].科研管理,2024,45 (10):12-23. [16] 胡雯,鲍悦华.技术政治时代下中美国际科技合作的战略转向比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2024 (2):168-179. [17] 徐磊.发展与安全并重:生成式人工智能风险的包容审慎监管[J].理论与改革,2024 (4):67-83,176. [18] YIN R K.Case study research:Design and methods[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:sage,2009. [19] EISENHARDT K M,GRAEBNER M E,Theory building from cases:Opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50 (1):25-32. [20] MCGANN J G.2020 global go to think tank index reports[R].Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania,2020. [21] MOORE J F.Predators and prey:A new ecology of competition[J].Harvard Business Review,1993,71 (3):75-86.
2025, 
