Abstract：Since the onset of the Trump 2.0 administration,U.S.artificial intelligence policy has progressively deviated from its tradition of technological governance,shifting its focus toward national security confrontation and ideological export.Accordingly,the Trump administration has instrumentalized AI policy to serve internal power struggles,while also leveraging the concept of technological sovereignty to use national security as a legitimate basis for suppressing strategic competitors.This politicized transformation of policy functions is profoundly reconstructing the operational logic of the U.S.AI strategy including prioritizing national security over technological development in its primary objectives,replacing self-improvement with the containment of rivals in its operational logic,and excluding professional judgment in favor of political loyalty in its decision-making model.The evolution of the AI strategy's core not only weakens American technological innovation and affects the international development landscape but also constitutes external pressure on China.To respond to this transformation,China's AI development planning should be grounded in its own institutional advantages to establish short-term risk mitigation mechanisms,strengthen medium-term endogenous innovation capabilities,and construct a long-term,open,and inclusive governance paradigm to proactively lead a new order in global AI governance.
潘雨祥. 特朗普2.0任期美国人工智能战略研究:变局剖析、对华影响与应对策略[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(10): 160-167.
Pan Yuxiang. U.S.Artificial Intelligence Strategy in Trump's Second Term: Analysis of the Changing Landscape,Impact on China and Response Strategies. , 2025(10): 160-167.
[1] National Science and Technology Council.National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan[EB/OL]. (2016-10)[2025-08-20].https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/national_ai_rd_strategic_plan.pdf. [2] National Science and Technology Council.The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan:2019 Update[EB/OL]. (2019-06-21)[2025-08-20].https://www.nitrd.gov/pubs/National-AI-RD-Strategy-2019.pdf. [3] National Science and Technology Council.National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan 2023 Update[EB/OL]. (2023-05-23)[2025-08-20].https://www.nitrd.gov/pubs/National-Artificial-Intelligence-Research-and-Development-Strategic-Plan-2023-Update.pdf. [4] 刁大明.特朗普第二任期内外极端议程探析[J].现代国际关系,2025 (5):65-82. [5] 王迎春,李辉,杨丞磊,等.美国人工智能研发战略计划2019更新版重点及启示[J].科技导报,2020 (11):26-30. [6] 李东格,高月.美《国家人工智能研究与发展战略计划》主要特点及启示[J].科技中国,2023 (9):99-101. [7] 张东冬.转向“数字霸权”:美国国家人工智能战略及其国际影响[J].当代世界与社会主义,2020 (5):158-168. [8] 袁珩,耿喆,徐峰,等.美国人工智能战略布局与对外策略[J].科技管理研究,2022,42 (12):34-39. [9] 蒋鑫,洪明.从“NSTC规划”到“CSIS规划”:美国人工智能赋能教育的颠覆与创新[J].中国远程教育,2019 (7):27-37. [10] The White House.Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence[EB/OL]. (2019-02-14)[2025-08-20].https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/14/2019-02544/maintaining-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence. [11] The White House.Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence[EB/OL]. (2025-01-21)[2025-08-20].https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/. [12] U.S.Congress.One Big Beautiful Bill Act[EB/OL]. (2025-07-04)[2025-08-20].https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1/text. [13] U.S.Congress.Decoupling America's Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025[EB/OL]. (2025-01-29)[2025-08-20].https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/321/text. [14] The Heritage Foundation.Mandate for leadership 2025: The conservative promise[EB/OL]. (2024-12-02)[2025-08-20].https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf [15] 李阳.技术政治视角下ChatGPT对美国政党政治的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (5):161-169. [16] 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院.美国白宫发布人工智能国家安全备忘[EB/OL]. (2025-01-16)[2025-08-20].http://www.casisd.cas.cn/zkcg/ydkb/kjzcyzxkb/2024/zczxkb202412/202501/t20250116_7519124.html. [17] 王威力,王玥珺.全球AI治理中的社会技术想象:人工智能发展规划的国际比较分析[J].情报资料工作,2025,46 (3):102-112. [18] 刘倩,关娇,刘红煦,等.美国“中国行动计划”对中国新兴技术国际科研合作的影响:以合成生物学领域为例[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (7):179-188. [19] 杨洋,陶蕊,曹勇,等.中美科技安全制度体系比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (5):139-149. [20] 史晓丽,闫伟泽.美国技术出口管制法律制度研究:以“视同出口”制度对高校的规制为视角[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (2):180-188. [21] 彭绪庶.中美人工智能创新比较研究:国家创新能力理论视角的分析[J].当代经济管理,2024 (5):1-11. [22] 王秉,史志,王渊洁.何为数智赋能:概念溯源与解构[J].情报资料工作,2024,45 (5):13-21. [23] 曹雨暄,岳立,潘均柏.美国制裁、双轮驱动与中国关键核心技术突破:基于双重机器学习的因果推断[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (3):164-176. [24] 达巍.终局之辩——2024年大选背景下的美国对华战略辩论[J].美国研究,2024,38 (6):58-71. [25] 汪习根,程睿.全球化视野下的人工智能立法:动态、困境与转向[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (7):140-150. [26] 张凌寒.中国需要一部怎样的《人工智能法》:中国人工智能立法的基本逻辑与制度架构[J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2024,42 (3):3-17. [27] 张凌寒.人工智能法律治理的路径拓展[J].中国社会科学,2025 (1):91-110.
2025, 
