Abstract：“Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Further Comprehensively Deepening Reform and Promoting Chinese-Style Modernization” adopted at the Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has made systematic arrangements for building a system and mechanism that supports comprehensive innovation,providing fundamental guidelines for further deepening the reform of the science and technology system and enhancing the governance system and governance capacity of science and technology.Few studies have focused on the role transformation of the private sector in the governance of emerging technologies.It has gradually demonstrated a leading force in technological research and development and market expansion,the establishment of self-regulatory organizations and industry associations,the formulation and implementation of industry standards,and the emergence of new power centers in global science and technology governance.Taking this phenomenon as a research perspective,this paper argues that the phenomenon of the private sector leading the governance of emerging technologies has both practical causes such as the expansion of market demand and the limitations of traditional regulation,and theoretical support from the governance dimension and the social risk dimension.After identifying the challenges that may arise from its leading performance,such as the classification difficulty of emerging technology risks,the limited effectiveness of governance,the legitimacy and transparency of self-governance,and the inability to balance the complexity of global science and technology governance,this paper proposes the value orientation and optimization path for China to deal with the private sector leading the governance of emerging technologies.It should be carried out from five aspects including the correction of the “private sector leading-regulatory department confirmation” model,the response to risk classification with different social and economic impacts,the improvement of industry governance transparency and self-regulation of accountability mechanisms,the construction of cross-border governance among regional and global technology enterprises,and the assumption of private sector social responsibility under the requirements of science and technology ethics.
吴一楷. 超越传统监管:私人部门在新兴技术治理中的主导作用与风险因应[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(8): 10-20.
Wu Yikai. Beyond Traditional Regulation:The Private Sector's Leading Role and Risk Response in Governance of Emerging Technologies. , 2025(8): 10-20.
[1]约翰.多纳休,理查德.泽克豪泽.合作:激变时代的合作治理[M].徐维,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2015. [2]马长山.迈向数字社会的法律[M].北京:法律出版社,2021:116. [3]VERALDI JD.Private Power,the Rule of Law and the European Union (July 19,2023)[J].CEU Democracy Institute Working Paper No.16,2023. [4]刘金河.权力流散:平台崛起与社会权力结构变迁[J].探索与争鸣,2022 (2):118-132,179. [5]包柠榛.私人主体对数据跨境流动治理的补充功能:生成逻辑、参与路径与启示[J].国际经贸探索,2024,40 (1):104-116. [6]肖梦黎.从平台治理到治理平台[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2024. [7]邢怀滨,苏竣.全球科技治理的权力结构、困境及政策含义[J].科学学研究,2006 (3):368-373. [8]罗伯特.吉尔平.国际关系政治经济学[M].杨宇光等,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006. [9]唐士亚.中国金融科技治理模式变迁及其逻辑[J].经济社会体制比较,2022 (5):90-99. [10]谢登科.健全科技治理体系是下一轮科技体制改革的重中之重[N/OL].中国社会科学报, (2024-07-08)[2024-08-23].https://cssn.cn/glx/glx_llsy/202407/t20240708_5763387.shtml. [11]李艳.新兴技术与国家安全:发展规律、治理逻辑与实践路径[J].国家安全研究,2022 (4):67-83,177-178. [12]邵占鹏.数字平台的三重属性与角色冲突[J].浙江学刊,2024 (5):67-77,238,2. [13]徐崇利.全球治理与跨国法律体系:硬法与软法的 “中心—外围” 之构造[J].国外理论动态,2013 (8):19-28. [14]陈伟光,钟列炀.全球数字经济治理:要素构成、机制分析与难点突破[J].国际经济评论,2022 (2):60-87,6. [15]黄志雄,潘泽玲. 《网络空间信任与安全巴黎倡议》评析[J].中国信息安全,2019 (2):104-107. [16]詹姆斯.罗西瑙.没有政府的治理[M].张胜军等,译.南昌:江西人民出版社,2001. [17]约瑟夫.奈,戴维·韦尔奇.理解全球冲突与合作:理论与历史[M].张小明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2012. [18]杨剑.数字边疆的权力与财富[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012. [19]苏珊.斯特兰奇.权力流散:世界经济中的国家与非国家权威[M].肖宏宇,耿协峰,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005. [20]赵志耘,李芳.新时代中国特色科技治理理论蕴含[J].中国软科学,2023 (3):1-15. [21]乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.南京:译林出版社,2004. [22]吴桐,郭建鸾.Facebook加密货币Libra的经济学分析:背景、内涵、影响与挑战[J].贵州社会科学,2019 (9):144-152. [23]COWLS J,DARIUS P,SANTISTEVAN D,et al.Constitutional metaphors:Facebook's “supreme court” and the legitimation of platform governance[J].New Media & Society,2022,26 (5):2448-2472. [24]刘学.数字平台参与社会治理的三重角色:基于组织的视角[J].浙江社会科学,2023 (11):93-101,158. [25]尹楠楠,刘国柱.数字时代拜登政府科技创新体系的理念与实践:以数字平台反垄断为中心的考察[J].南开学报 (哲学社会科学版),2024 (3):41-55. [26]何勇军,刘群芳.关于大型科技公司的平台经济和泛金融化的治理探究[J].科技与金融,2021 (9):41-45. [27]ZHENG X,ZHOU G,ZENG D D.Platform governance in the era of AI and the digital economy[J].Frontiers of Engineering Management,2023,10 (1):177-182. [28]王勇,徐婉,赵秋运,等.中国新能源汽车何以实现换道超车:基于新结构经济学的分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2023,43 (9):39-54. [29]许可.论新兴科技法律治理的范式迭代:以人脸识别技术为例[J].社会科学辑刊,2023 (6):111-120. [30]王妍,彭守仲,单晓娜,等.关于国际科技组织参与全球科技治理的若干思考[J].今日科苑,2024 (5):24-32. [31]尹楠楠,刘国柱.塑造大国竞争的工具:拜登政府科技联盟战略[J].国际政治研究,2021,42 (5):109-129,7-8.
2025, 
