How Can Leading Science and Technology Enterprises Achieve Innovation Ecosystem Substitution in the Context of “Strangle hold” ——A Single Case Study of Huawei HarmonyOS Ecosystem
Huo Ying1,2, Sun Hui3
1. School of Economics and Management,Harbin University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150080,China; 2. School of Management,Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150022,China; 3. Institute of Electronic Technology,Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150022,China
Abstract：With the intensification of geopolitical science and technology competition,the construction of local ecology by leading science and technology enterprises to replace foreign ecosystems has become the key to break through the “strangle hold”context.However,the existing research has not yet formed a systematic theoretical framework to explain the transformation mechanism of competitive advantage between different ecosystems.This article introduces the “substitution”theory in modern ecology,using Huawei HarmonyOS ecosystem as a case study to explore the implementation path of Chinese Leading Science and Technology enterprises (LSTEs)in building competitive local ecosystems in a limited environment by replacing Android in a specific market space.The research findings are as follows.①Chinese LSTEs face the dual “strangle hold”dilemma of technology ecology and business ecology.Through the optimal distinctiveness action,they can effectively respond to the dual pressures of market legitimacy and technology competitiveness,and then lead the coordinated development of local innovation chain and industrial chain,so as to achieve self-reliance and self-improvement in science and technology.②The construction of local ecological competitiveness can be divided into two stages which named as incubation and cultivation,and growth competition.The former can build a legitimate uniqueness through technological ecological compatibility and commercial ecological drainage,and construct a compensatory orchestration mechanism to cross the threshold of user quantity and achieve system substitution.The latter can achieve unique legitimacy through technological ecological substitution and commercial ecological reshaping,and build an integrative orchestration mechanism to cross the threshold of product categories and achieve ecological substitution.
霍影, 孙辉. “卡脖子”情境下科技领军企业如何实现创新生态系统替代——对华为鸿蒙生态的单案例探索[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(9): 9-20.
Huo Ying, Sun Hui. How Can Leading Science and Technology Enterprises Achieve Innovation Ecosystem Substitution in the Context of “Strangle hold” ——A Single Case Study of Huawei HarmonyOS Ecosystem. , 2025(9): 9-20.
[1]柳卸林,杨培培,王倩.创新生态系统:推动创新发展的第四种力量[J].科学学研究,2022,40 (6):1096-1104. [2]霍影,武建龙. “卡脖子”情境下科技领军企业突破性技术创新路径研究:基于创新生态系统视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45 (5):163-183. [3]谭劲松,宋娟,陈晓红.产业创新生态系统的形成与演进: “架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J].管理世界,2021,37 (9):167-191. [4]ADNER R.Ecosystem as structure:An actionable construct for strategy[J].Journal of Management,2016,43 (1):39-58. [5]JACOBIDES M G,CENNAMO C,GAWER A.Towards a theory of ecosystems[J].Strategic Management Journal,2018 (39):2255-2276. [6]戈峰.现代生态学 (第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2008. [7]陈克龙,苏旭.生物地理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2013. [8]俞荣建,王雅萍,赵一智,等.破解 “卡脖子”技术难题: “情境—策略”非对称匹配视角[J].中国科学院院刊,2024,38 (4):580-592. [9]MOWDAY R T,SUTTON R I.Organizational behavior:Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts[J].Annual Review of Psychology,1993,44 (1):195-229. [10]霍影,孙辉.技术和生态双元 “卡脖子”情境下科技领军企业突破性技术创新路径研究[J].中国科技论坛,2024 (7):110-122. [11]毛荐其,刘娜,陈雷.基于技术生态的技术自组织演化机理研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29 (6):819-824,832. [12]Moore J F.The rise of a new corporate form[J].Washington Quarterly,1998,21 (1):167-181. [13]尹西明,陈劲,刘畅.科技领军企业:定义、分类评价与促进对策[J].创新科技,2021,21 (6):1-8. [14]霍影. “卡脖子”情境下科技领军企业突破性技术创新动力演进机制:科技自立自强使命担当视角[J].科学与管理,2024,44 (6):1-8. [15]包云岗,孙凝晖.科技发展如何处理好开放与自主的关系[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36 (5):552-556. [16]苏敬勤,何新月,韩少杰.平台企业如何响应制度压力:基于合法性与效率的整合视角[J].南开管理评论,2025,28 (7):17-28. [17]邵美蓉,安立仁,董津津.生态系统核心企业破坏性创新的协同演化:基于双元竞争压力多案例分析[J].软科学,2023,37 (7):43-51. [18]郭海,李永慧,赵雁飞.求同还是存异?最优区分研究回顾与展望[J].南开管理评论,2020,23 (6):214-224. [19]ZHAO E Y,FISHER G,LOUNSBURY M,et al.Optimal Distinctiveness:Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management[J].Strategic Management Journal,2017,38 (1):93-113. [20]SUAREZ F F,GRODAL S,GOTSOPOULOS A.Perfect timing? Dominant category,dominant design and the window of opportunity for firm entry[J].Strategic Management Journal,2018,36 (3):437-448. [21]彭新敏,张祺瑞,刘电光.后发企业超越追赶的动态过程机制:基于最优区分理论视角的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2022,38 (3):145-162. [22]GIOIA D A,PRICE K N,HAMILTON A L.Forging and identity:An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2010,55 (1):1-46. [23]张雪,王凤彬.生态系统向心力与离心力的演变:基于小米生态链的纵向案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2023 (9):174-192. [24]牛璐,陈志军,程浩宇,等.双重身份后发企业如何突破 “卡脖子”困局?[J].科学学研究,2024,42 (10):2172-2181. [25]MCKNIGHT B,ZIETSMA C.Finding the threshold:A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2018,33 (4):493-512. [26]郭长伟,朱亚丽,于振洋,等.大企业内部创业单元如何脱颖而出:基于最优区分视角的纵向案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2024,27 (8):161-171,184. [27]YIN R K.Case Study Research:Design and Methods (5ed)[M].London:SAGE Publications,2014. [28]毛基业,李亮.管理学质性研究的回顾、反思与展望[J].南开管理评论,2018,21 (6):12-16. [29]EISENHARDT K M.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14 (4):532-550. [30]STRAUSS A L,CORBIN J.Basics of qualitative research:Grounded theory procedures and techniques[M].London:SAGE Publications,1990. [31]GIOIA D A,CORLEY K G,HAMILTON A L.Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research:Notes on the Gioia methodology[J].Organizational Research Methods,2013,16 (1):15-31. [32]王凤彬,张雪.用纵向案例研究讲好中国故事:过程研究范式、过程理论化与中西对话前景[J].管理世界,2022,38 (6):191-213. [33]DATTÉE B J,ARRÈGLE J-L,BARBIERI P,et al.The dynamics of organizational autonomy:Oscillations at automobili lamborghini[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2022,67 (3):721-768.
2025, 
