Abstract：Driven by the transformation of research paradigms and national strategic demands,organized research is profoundly reshaping the mode of knowledge production in universities.Drawing on Mode 3 Theory of Knowledge Production,this study constructs a dual-logic analytical framework integrating research and education,revealing that organized research in universities follows not only a research logic oriented toward task effectiveness but also an educational logic centered on the development of academic agency.The synergistic coexistence of these two logics constitutes an inherent requirement for the high-quality development of organized research in universities.However,structural tensions have emerged between the research logic and the educational logic across the value,institutional,and organizational dimensions.These tensions are manifested in the implicit marginalization of educational values under the expansion of instrumental rationality,the crowding-out of the educational logic by task-oriented institutional arrangements,and the organizational constraints on the development of young academic researchers.To address these challenges,universities should reinforce the educational orientation of organized research through value reconstruction,promote the coordinated integration of research tasks and talent cultivation through institutional improvement,and optimize organizational mechanisms to facilitate the development of capabilities among young academic researchers.These efforts will help transform organized research from structural imbalance to synergistic coexistence,thereby providing new theoretical explanations and practical implications for the coordinated advancement of research innovation and innovative talent cultivation in universities in the new era.
李天圆. 高校有组织科研的双重逻辑:内涵机理、冲突与重构[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(10): 98-107.
Li Tianyuan. The Dual Logic of Organized Research in Universities:Nature and Mechanisms,Tensions and Reconstruction. , 2026(10): 98-107.
[1] Geiger R L.Organized research units:their role in the development of university research[J].The Journal of Higher Education,1990,61(1):1-19. [2] 程飞亚,赵祥辉.美国大学有组织科研的变迁与特征:基于政府与大学的互动史考察[J].外国教育研究,2025,52(10):100-113. [3] HM Treasury,Department of Trade and Industry,Department for Education and Skills.Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014[EB/OL].(2004-07-12)[2024-09-04].https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/spending_sr04_science.htm. [4] Federal Government of Germany.Progress report on the High-Tech Strategy:important steps taken in the right direction[EB/OL].(2019-09-04)[2025-03-30].https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/service/archive/fortschritt-hightech-strategie-1667770. [5] Cabinet Office,Government of Japan.The 6th science,technology and innovation basic plan[EB/OL].(2021-03-26)[2025-03-30].https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/index6.html. [6] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部印发《关于加强高校有组织科研 推动高水平自立自强的若干意见》[EB/OL].(2022-08-29)[2023-07-15].https://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202208/t20220829_656091.html. [7] 姚建建,赵颖萱.高校有组织科研:核心要素及有效模式[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2024,26(6):122-130. [8] 潘玉腾.高校实施有组织科研的问题解构与路径建构[J].中国高等教育,2022(Z3):12-14. [9] 陈爱志.地方应用型高校加强有组织科研的路径探析[J].中国高等教育,2022(24):44-46. [10] 罗志敏,李子龙,胡燕娜.有组织科研与大学的建构[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,46(2):119-128. [11] 雷朝滋.加强高校有组织科研以高水平科技创新服务中国式现代化建设[J].中国高等教育,2023(7):19-23. [12] 董秀华,金莹.高校基于有组织科研参与“揭榜挂帅”:理论框架、实践困境和变革图景[J].黑龙江高教研究,2025,43(3):42-52. [13] 吴俊,易镇邪,陈春平.地方高校开展有组织科研的实践与思考:湖南农业大学农学院的个案研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2025,26(4):84-92. [14] 吴合文,石耀月.高校有组织科研:生成流变、理念指向与难点突破[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,52(2):53-64. [15] 叶晓力,夏玲丽.高校有组织科研政策执行的现实困境与优化路径[J].黑龙江高教研究,2025,43(7):43-49. [16] 陈霞玲.高校开展有组织科研的组织模式、经验特征与问题对策[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2023(7):78-87. [17] 张娟,荀振芳.高校有组织科研的内涵、特征及实施路径[J].高等工程教育研究,2023(6):99-104. [18] 耿旭,欧阳光华.社会影响力评价:高校有组织科研评价的新方向[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2024(2):40-48,59. [19] 黄巨臣,萧然.高校“有组织科研”的碎片化困境与突破路径[J].科学学研究,2024,42(10):2122-2129. [20] 罗家才,李化树,穆湘兰.地方应用型高校有组织科研的伦理困境、根源及其纾解策略[J].黑龙江高教研究,2025,43(8):64-69. [21] 唐青,李佑新.高校科研育人的价值机理与完善路径[J].大学教育科学,2022(4):85-92,127. [22] 王金利,马焕灵.高校有组织科研的再澄清:话语、价值与模式[J].江苏高教,2026(2):76-84. [23] Gibbons M,Limoges C,Nowotny H,et al.The new production of knowledge:the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies[M].London:SAGE,1994:2-7. [24] Carayannis E G,Campbell D F J.‘Mode 3’and‘Quadruple Helix’:toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem[J].International Journal of Technology Management,2009,46(3/4):201-234. [25] 陈良雨,张欣.基于组织惯性视角的高校有组织科研研究[J].中国科技论坛,2025(9):1-8. [26] 胡兵,甘晖.高校有组织科研:形成要素、实施困境及路径对策[J].研究生教育研究,2024(2):45-51. [27] 陈虹,崔本琳.有组织科研情境下高校青年科技人才创新绩效影响因素的组态效应研究[J].科学决策,2025(10):205-219. [28] 张凤,马永红,张飞龙.基于国家重大科技项目的研究生培养模式研究:以长鹰无人机为例[J].研究生教育研究,2024(6):43-52,117. [29] 马廷奇,李蓉芳.知识生产模式转型与人才培养模式创新[J].高教发展与评估,2019,35(5):8-16,113-114. [30] Etzkowitz H,Leydesdorff L.The dynamics of innovation:from national systems and“Mode 2”to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J].Research Policy,2000,29(2):109-123. [31] 闫广芬,杜剑涛.“双一流”背景下的“强基计划”:功能定位、现实困境与优化路径[J].高教探索,2022(6):26-33. [32] 刘继安,郑润廷,徐艳茹.理解高校有组织科研的整合性框架:基于边界、主体、职能互动关系的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2025(4):53-62. [33] 余洁,李彩云.大科学时代的高校有组织科研:内在逻辑、现实障碍与推进路径[J].社会科学家,2025(6):181-187. [34] 王楠,张莎.构建以跨学科和社会影响为导向的科研评估框架:基于英国“科研卓越框架”的分析[J].中国高教研究,2021(8):71-77. [35] 曾剑雄,张国栋,王国耀.博士生导师“为导不导”行为的表现类型及生成原因:基于博士生访谈的质性分析[J].研究生教育研究,2023(6):63-70. [36] 胡咏梅,赵平.教学与科研工作时间何以影响高校教师的主观幸福感[J].北京社会科学,2024(8):115-128. [37] 赵立雨,朱白雪,高冬祺.高校有组织科研:内涵、难点堵点与化解对策[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(16):150-160. [38] 阎光才.政策情境、组织行动逻辑与个人行为选择:四十年来项目制的政策效应与高校组织变迁[J].高等教育研究,2019,40(7):33-45. [39] 刘进,王璐瑶.麻省理工学院新工程教育转型:源起、框架与启示[J].高等工程教育研究,2019(6):162-171. [40] 康云菲,蒋凯.高校有组织科研与拔尖创新人才培养协同:应为、难为与何为[J].江苏高教,2025(9):1-10. [41] 熊进,郭聪颖.高校有组织科研的集体行动困境及化解策略[J].现代大学教育,2024,40(4):18-26,111.
2026, 
