The Evolutionary Characteristics,Tool Configuration and Thematic Shifts in the Policies for Building Shanghai into an International Center for Science and Technology Innovation-Based on Policy Texts from 2015 to 2024
Hu Qiaoshi, Guo Junhua, Li Xinran
School of International and Public Affairs,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China
Abstract：The Shanghai International Science and Technology Innovation Center(SISTIC)serves as a critical strategic pillar in building a science and technology powerhouse,with policy drivers playing a pivotal role.This study examines 80 policy texts issued by Shanghai Municipality between 2015 and 2024 regarding SISTIC's development.Employing a three-dimensional analytical framework(policy evolution-policy tools-policy themes”)and NVivo 14/ROST CM6 software,the article conductsa quantitative analysis of the policy evolution trajectory and content characteristics.Findings indicate three distinct stages of policy development:initiation,development and maturation,and deepening and expansion,with considerable volatility in issuance volume across stages.While the policy tool portfolio dynamically aligns with policy evolution,it exhibits structural imbalance-over-reliance on environmental tools,moderate deployment of supply-side tools,and underutilization of demand-side measures, with significant disparities in application ratios.Policy themes have sequentially shifted from foundational development to industry-innovation integration and ecosystem optimization.Based on these insights,the article proposes recommendations to institutionalize policy evolution,optimize policy tool allocation,and strengthen forward-looking strategizing of policy themes.
胡乔石, 郭俊华, 李欣然. 上海国际科技创新中心建设政策的演进特征、工具配置与主题转向——基于2015—2024年的政策文本[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(2): 91-100.
Hu Qiaoshi, Guo Junhua, Li Xinran. The Evolutionary Characteristics,Tool Configuration and Thematic Shifts in the Policies for Building Shanghai into an International Center for Science and Technology Innovation-Based on Policy Texts from 2015 to 2024. , 2026(2): 91-100.
[1]杜德斌.全球科技创新中心:世界趋势与中国的实践[J].科学,2018(6):15-18,69. [2]江庆龄.《全球科技创新中心100强(2024)》发布[N].中国科学报,2024-11-25(001). [3]熊鸿儒.全球科技创新中心的形成与发展[J].学习与探索,2015(9):112-116. [4]杜德斌,何舜辉.全球科技创新中心的内涵、功能与组织结构[J].中国科技论坛,2016(2):10-15. [5]陈诗波,陈亚平.我国建设世界科技创新中心的国际比较研究[J].科学管理研究,2022(5):31-38. [6]陈强,王浩,敦帅.全球科技创新中心:演化路径、典型模式与经验启示[J].经济体制改革,2020(3):152-159. [7]陆军,韦天宇.功能迭代中的国际科技创新中心:演进路径与风险应对[J].北京行政学院学报,2024(3):62-72. [8]陈搏.全球科技创新中心评价指标体系初探[J].科研管理,2016(S1):289-295. [9]陈玲,孙君,孔文豪,等.国际科技创新中心发展模式的聚类分析与比较[J].科学学研究,2024(9):1967-1978. [10]罗月领,高希杰,何万篷.上海建设全球科技创新中心体制机制问题研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015(18):28-33. [11]李国平.以国际科技创新中心建设支撑首都高质量发展[J].城市问题,2022(12):13-18. [12]张玉梅,吴先明,高厚宾.资源“集聚”与“辐射”视角下国际创新中心的成长机制研究:以粤港澳大湾区为例[J].中国工业经济,2022(11):97—115. [13]徐硼,罗帆.政策工具视角下的中国科技创新政策[J].科学学研究,2020(5):826—833. [14]ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Reindustrialization and technology[M].London:Longman Group Limited,1985. [15]KOMEN M H C,GERKING S,FOLMER H.Income and environmental R&D:Empirical evidence from OECD countries[J].Environment and Development Economics,1997(4),505-515. [16]LUNDVALL B A.National systems of innovation:Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning[M].London:Anthem Press,2010. [17]裴瑞敏,姜影,肖尤丹.科技人才政策变迁与政策主体协同网络演化研究:基于对1978—2020年政策文本的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2022(8):32-46. [18]张亚明,赵科,宋雯婕,等.区域科技成果转化政策工具的配置与优化分析:基于河北省的政策文本计量[J].软科学,2024(1):23-30. [19]郝凯冰.基于三维框架的我国科技伦理治理政策分析[J].科学学研究,2024(11):2241-2253,2285. [20]何文盛,卢雅灵.科技创新领域中财政政策的演进特征、工具应用与变迁逻辑研究:基于文本挖掘分析[J].中国科技论坛,2025(8):21-31. [21]胡曙虹,黄丽,杜德斌.全球科技创新中心建构的实践:基于三螺旋和创新生态系统视角的分析:以硅谷为例[J].上海经济研究,2016(3):21-28. [22]张宇鹏,陆小文,卢明欣,等.中美网络安全政策比较研究:基于“演进-工具-主题”的三维框架[J].情报杂志,2025(2):124-135. [23]PALUMBO D J,CALISTA D J.Implementation and the policy process:Opening up the black box[M].Westport,CT:Greenwood Press,1990. [24]姚怡帆,张相,叶中华.目标-工具-效力:中国数字政府建设政策的三维图景[J].管理评论,2024(5):248-259. [25]ISOAHO K,GRITSENKO D,MAKELA E.Topic modeling and text analysis for qualitative policy research[J].Policy Studies Journal,2021(1):300-324. [26]杨志军,周艳米.中央和地方“十四五”防灾减灾救灾政策规划文本量化研究:基于“X-Y-Z”三维政策工具分析框架[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2023(3):90-105,127. [27]杜娟,朱旭峰.官员更替、政策连续性与贫困治理绩效:来自国家级贫困县脱贫的经验证据[J].公共行政评论,2023(1):6-28,197.
2026, 
