Quantitative Analysis of Policy Texts on Organizational Institutions Supporting Comprehensive Innovation:A Three-Dimensional Framework of“Policy Instruments-Organizational Characteristics-Innovation Value Chain”
Li Tuoyu1,2, Wu Jiayi2, Xue Yuxin2
1. Institute of Scientific and Technological Education Policy,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China; 2. School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China
Abstract：Comprehensive innovation lies at the core of the innovation-driven development strategy in the new era.Exploring the policy framework of organizational institutions that support comprehensive innovation is of far-reaching significance for achieving high-level self-reliance in science and technology,deepening reform-driven innovation,and promoting high-quality development.Drawing on organizational institutional theory,policy instrument theory,and innovation value chain theory,this study constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of“policy instruments-organizational characteristics-innovation value chain”and conducts a systematic quantitative analysis of 78 national-level science and technology innovation policies issued since the 18th National Congress of the CPC,covering 1,068 coded units.The findings reveal that:①The configuration of policy instruments exhibits structural imbalance,with environmental instruments being over-concentrated(52.5%)while demand-side instruments are severely under-supplied(7.8%),reflecting a policy bias of“emphasizing environment creation while neglecting demand pull”;②Organizational institutional arrangements show strong path dependence,where administrative logic predominates(57.9%),the fund-based system remains the primary organizational method,and a pluralistic governance structure has yet to fully take shape;③Support along the innovation value chain displays a“back-end heavy,front-end light”pattern,with basic research receiving insufficient support(20.2%)compared to the excessive focus on market promotion(44.4%);④New organizational models are emerging yet face practical tensions,notably the strategic scientific and technological forces which embody mission-driven characteristics,and the“challenge-based listing and champion mechanism”which achieves a fusion of triple institutional logics.Additionally,the relationship between a capable government and an effective market tends toward a dynamic balance.Theoretically,this study proposes an integrated,multi-perspective policy analysis framework,uncovers the distinctive logic of innovation policy in a transition economy,and advances the empirical turn in policy studies.Policy recommendations include improving the organizational institutional system supporting comprehensive innovation,emphasizing differentiated institutional supply,and exploring new organizational modes conducive to comprehensive innovation.
[1]THORNTON P H,OCASIO W,LOUNSBURY M.The institutional logics perspective[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2012. [2]陈劲,朱子钦,杨硕,等.全面创新:制度视角的概念、框架与政策启示[J].创新科技,2023,23(10):1-12. [3]乔黎黎,刘中全,任志鹏.支持全面创新基础制度的理论实践与逻辑框架[J].科研管理,2024,45(3):1-9 [4]HOWLETT M.Designing public policies:Principles and instruments[M].London:Routledge,2011. [5]BORRÁS S,EDQUIST C.The choice of innovation policy instruments[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(8):1513-1522. [6]ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Reindustrialization and technology[M].London:Longman,1985. [7]EDLER J,GEORGHIOU L.Public procurement and innovation:Resurrection of a neglected policy tool[J].Research Policy,2007,36(7):949-963. [8]HANSEN M T,BIRKINSHAW J.The Innovation value chain[J].Harvard Business Review,2007,85(6):121-130. [9]LANDAU R,ROSENBERG N.The positive sum strategy[M].Washington D.C.:National Academy Press,1986:275-305. [10]许庆瑞,郑刚,陈劲.全面创新管理:创新管理新范式初探:理论溯源与框架[J].管理学报,2006(2):135-142. [11]苗蕾.中小企业全面创新管理实施框架与典型模式研究[J].企业技术开发,2016,35(22):74-76,98. [12]张克,刘馨岳.新时代全面创新改革试验复制推广机制:基于第一至第三批推广举措的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2023(7):53-62. [13]黄文龙,高永惠,陈军义.基于全面创新管理的高校就业工作新模式研究[J].教育与职业,2009(26):25-27. [14]DIMAGGIO P,POWELL W.The iron cage revisited[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160. [15]GREENWOOD R,et al.The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism[M].Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications,2008:99-129. [16]HILKER C,SCHAETZ N,LISCHKA J.The logics of innovation:Institutional logics and isomorphic pressures in public service media innovation labs in the age of artificial intelligence[J/OL].(2025-06-05)[2026-01-29].https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251349911. [17]GREENWOOD R,RAYNARD M,KODEIH F,et al.Institutional complexity and organizational responses[J].The Academy of Management Annals,2011,5(1):317-371. [18]FLANAGAN K,UYARRA E,LARANJA M.Reconceptualising the‘policy mix’for innovation[J].Research Policy,2011,40(5):702-713. [19]ADNER R.Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem[J].Harvard Business Review,2006,84(4):98-107. [20]JACOBIDES M G,CENNAMO C,GAWER A.Towards a theory of ecosystems[J].Strategic Management Journal,2018,39(8):2255-2276. [21]GRANSTRAND O,HOLGERSSON M.Innovation ecosystems:A conceptual review and a new definition[J].Technovation,2020,90/91:102098. [22]张志鑫,郑晓明,钱晨.“四链”融合赋能新质生产力:内在逻辑和实践路径[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(4):105-116. [23]OECD.Frascati Manual 2015:Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development[M].Paris:OECD Publishing,2018. [24]MAZZUCATO M.Mission-oriented research & innovation in the EU:A problem-solving approach[R].Brussels:European Commission,2018. [25]EVANS P.Embedded Autonomy:States and industrial transformation[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1995. [26]曾婧婧,宋娇娇,李铭禄.参与风险约束下科技悬赏的激励机制研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(11):40-48. [27]VON HIPPEL E.The Sources of innovation[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,1988. [28]沈海燕.新型举国体制优势转化为科技自立自强的内在机理与实践路径[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2024,23(4):122-128. [29]CHESBROUGH H.Open innovation[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2003. [30]NORTH D C.Institutions,institutional Change and economic performance[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
2026, 
