Concept Transformation and System Improvement of China's Scientific and Technological Legislation During China's 14th Five-Year Period——Example of Promulgation of Science and Technology Law
Wu Kewei1,2
1. School of Law,Peking University,Bejing 100871,China; 2. Science and Technology Law Research Center,Peking University,Bejing 100871,China
Abstract：Adjusting the legal relationship of science and technology with the concept and method of the rule-of-law is the core of science and technology legislation.Science and technology legislation contains a logical tension between the developmental characteristics of science-related affairs and the pursuit of legal stability.China's science and technology legislation is a late-developing centralized form with strong historical characteristics of oath,responsiveness,guidance,and bottom-line control.Since China's reform and opening-up,the systemization and legalization of China's scientific and technological legislation have made remarkable achievements,along with the problems of local imbalance between supply and demand and single-mindedness.The science and technology legislation during the 14th Five-Year period should shift from the traditional concept of system perfection to a comprehensive approach that takes into account system logic and legal efficiency by taking into account the openness of policy and the scientific and authoritative nature of the legislation.Revising the Promulgation of Science and Technology Law and other core legislation should be the method to consolidate the existing correct historical choices,and to further cultivate the social awareness of innovation and the cultural foundation of rule-of-law in scientific and technological affairs.
吴柯苇. “十四五”时期中国科技立法理念转化与体系完善——以《科普法》为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(2): 15-22.
Wu Kewei. Concept Transformation and System Improvement of China's Scientific and Technological Legislation During China's 14th Five-Year Period——Example of Promulgation of Science and Technology Law. , 2022(2): 15-22.
[1]罗玉中.科技立法体系刍议[J].中外法学,1997(6):24-34. [2]赵震江.法律与科学技术[J].科技与法律,1991(2):59-71. [3]经济日报.中国经济增长多少？2020年GDP总量是2000年10倍[N/OL].(2021-01-20)[2021-06-07].http://www.ce.cn/macro/more/202101/20/t20210120_36240742.shtml. [4]陈劲.“十四五”是中国迈向创新型国家前列的关键期[J].中国科技论坛,2021(1):2. [5]MACEY J R.Transaction costs and the normative elements of the public choice model:an application to constitutional theory[J].Virginia law review,1988,74(2):471-518. [6]陈铭祥.法政策学[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2011:41. [7]贺德方,陈宝明,周华东.国际科技立法发展趋势分析及若干思考[J].中国软科学,2020(12):1-10. [8]易继明.技术理性、社会发展与自由 科技法学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005:221-245. [9]张军荣,贺宁馨.中国“拜杜规则”能提升专利质量吗[J].情报杂志,2020,39(12):62-66,143. [10]段瑞春.科技与法律:现代文明的双翼——中国科学技术法学25年(1985—2010)[J].科技与法律,2010(6):1-5. [11]杨丹.生命科技时代的刑法规制——以基因编辑婴儿事件为中心[J].法学杂志,2020,41(12):71-80. [12]姚万勤.基因编辑技术应用的刑事风险与刑法应对——兼及《刑法修正案(十一)》第39条的规定[J/OL].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版):1-8.(2021-01-25)[2021-06-07].https://doi.org/10.19525/j.issn1008-407x.2021.02.008. [13]江利红.创新驱动发展战略背景下科技立法的完善[J].法治论坛,2018(3):3-18. [14]王秀芹,薛澜,史冬波.中国大学响应“拜杜法案”的特征及逻辑框架[J/OL].科学学研究:1-15.(2021-05-24)[2021-06-07].https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20210129.004. [15]李政刚.我国科技创新立法的价值重塑及制度因应[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(9):13-19. [16]龙卫球.科技法迭代视角下的人工智能立法[J].法商研究,2020,37(1):57-72. [17]罗玉中.完善我国科技法律制度的几点思考——以生命科学为例[J].社会科学家,2003(4):6-10. [18]张文显,舒国滢.法学如何成为科学[J].浙大法律评论,2020(1):3-24. [19]张文显.习近平法治思想的实践逻辑、理论逻辑和历史逻辑[J].中国社会科学,2021(3):4-25,204.
2022, 
