How to Promote the Transformation of University's Scientific and Technological Achievements:Experience from the Developed Countries
Zhong Wei1, Chen Yan2
1.School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China; 2.Torch High Technology Industry Development Center,Ministry of Science and Technology,Beijing 100045,China
Abstract：The level of scientific and technological achievements transformation in Chinese universities has always been lower than that in developed countries such as Europe and the United States.Actively learning from and drawing on the experience of developed countries has become an option for the Chinese government to improve the level of university scientific and technological achievements.Based on the obstacles faced by the technologies providers (universities)and receivers (enterprises and venture capital),this paper constructs three mechanisms,such as supplier intervention,demand side intervention,and the link of supply and demand,and uses the specific policy practices of the developed countries such as the United States,Canada,and the United Kingdom to explain and verify these three mechanisms in terms of laws and regulations and financial support.The perspective of “filling the gap + policy tools”proposed by the paper is conducive to Chinese policy makers to learn from or improve the policy intervention mechanism for scientific and technological achievements transformation in Chinese universities.
钟卫, 陈彦. 政府如何促进大学科技成果转化:基于发达国家的经验总结[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(8): 170-178.
Zhong Wei, Chen Yan. How to Promote the Transformation of University's Scientific and Technological Achievements:Experience from the Developed Countries. , 2019(8): 170-178.
[1]RASMUSSEN E,RICE M P.A framework for government support mechanisms aimed at enhancing university technology transfer:The Norwegian case[J].International journal of technology transfer and commercialisation,2012,11 (1/2):1-25. [2]杜伟锦,宋园,李靖,等.科技成果转化政策演进及区域差异分析——以京津冀和长三角为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38 (2):3-11. [3]杜健.高校科技成果转化难的症结及对策研究[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2017 (3):70-76. [4]钟卫,陈宝明.中国高校科技成果转化绩效评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (4):41-49. [5]宋雅娟.三问科技成果转化: “三部曲”如何破解 “睡大觉”难题[EB/OL].[2017-02-23].http://tech.gmw.cn/2017-02/23/content_23802231.htm. [6]SALMENKAITA J P,SALO A.Rationales for government intervention in the commercialization of new technologies[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2002,14 (2):183-200. [7]MOWERY D C,NELSON RR,SAMPAT B N,et al.The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities:An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980[J].Research policy,2001,30 (1):99-119. [8]贺德方.对科技成果及科技成果转化若干基本概念的辨析与思考[J].中国软科学,2011 (11):1-7. [9]杨善林,郑丽,冯南平,等.技术转移与科技成果转化的认识及比较[J].中国科技论坛,2013 (12):116-122. [10]许端阳.国外技术转移监测评价的特点及其对我国科技成果转化评价的启示[J].科技管理研究,2013,33 (21):23-28. [11]李修全.应用类科技成果转化的概念及测度方法—— “科技成果转化指数”构建探讨[J].科技管理研究,2015,35 (23):46-49. [12]钟卫.校办企业改革及效果评价[J].中国高校科技,2016 (1):105-110. [13]钟卫,左毅.产学研合作效果测量:理论与实践[J].中国科技论坛,2015 (8):51-57. [14]ETZKOWITZ H,WEBSTER A,GEBHARDT C,et al.The future of the university and the university of the future:Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm[J].Research policy,2000,29 (2):313-330. [15]孙远钊.论科技成果转化与产学研合作——美国 《 拜杜法》 35 周年的回顾与展望[J].科技与法律,2015 (5):1008-1037. [16]MUSTAR P,WRIGHT M.Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms？A comparison of France and the United Kingdom[J].The journal of technology transfer,2010,35 (1):42-65. [17]DELLA M A,LISSONI F,LLERENA P.Institutional change and academic patenting:French universities and the innovation act of 1999[J].Journal of evolutionary economics,2013,23 (1):211-239. [18]GIURI P,MUNARI F,PASQUINI M.What determines university patent commercialization？Empirical evidence on the role of IPR ownership[J].Industry and innovation,2013,20 (5):488-502. [19]梅姝娥,仲伟俊.我国高校科技成果转化障碍因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29 (3):22-27. [20]THURSBY J G,THURSBY M C.University licensing[J].Oxford review of economic policy,2007,23 (4):620-639. [21]JENSEN R,THURSBY M.Proofs and prototypes for sale:The licensing of university inventions[J].American economic review,2001,91 (1):240-259. [22]MUNARI F,TOSCHI L.Do venture capitalists have a bias against investment in academic spin-offs？Evidence from the micro-and nanotechnology sector in the UK[J].Industrial and corporate change,2011,20 (2):397-432. [23]AUERSWALD P E,BRANSCOMB L M.Valleys of death and Darwinian seas:Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States[J].The journal of technology transfer,2003,28 (3-4):227-239. [24]STEVENS A J.The enactment of Bayh-Dole[J].The journal of technology transfer,2004,29 (1):93-99. [25]SENOO D,FUKUSHIMA M,YONEYAMA S,et al.Strategic diversity in Japanese university technology licensing offices[J].International journal of knowledge management studies,2009,3 (1-2):60-78. [26]LISSONI F.Academic patenting in Europe:An overview of recent research and new perspectives[J].World patent information,2012,34 (3):197-205. [27]BALDINI N,GRIMALDI R,SOBRERO M.Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge:A study of Italian universities′ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002[J].Research policy,2006,35 (4):518-532. [28]BALDINI N,FINI R,GRIMALDI R,et al.Organisational change and the institutionalisation of university patenting activity in Italy[J].Minerva,2014,52 (1):27-53. [29]CLARYSSE B,WRIGHT M,LOCKETT A,et al.Academic spin-offs,formal technology transfer and capital raising[J].Industrial and corporate change,2007,16 (4):609-640. [30]肖广岭.跨越 “死亡之谷”的新尝试——美国 “概念验证中心”及对中国的启示[J].中国科技论坛,2014 (2):131-137. [31]RASMUSSEN E.Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research:Lessons from Canada[J].Technovation,2008,28 (8):506-517. [32]KOCHENKOVA A,GRIMALDI R,MUNARI F.Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities:A review of academic literature[J].The journal of technology transfer,2016,41 (3):407-429. [33]RASMUSSEN E,SØRHEIM R.How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for university spin-offs:Proof-of-concept,pre-seed,and seed funding[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2012,24 (7):663-678. [34]LINK A N,SCOTT J T.Universities as partners in US research joint ventures[J].Research policy,2005,34 (3):385-393. [35]AUDRETSCH D B,LINK A N,SCOTT J T.Public/private technology partnerships:Evaluating SBIR-supported research[J].Research policy,2002,31 (1):145-158. [36]FELLER I,AILES C P,ROESSNER J D.Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry:Evidence from engineering research centers[J].Research policy,2002,31 (3):457-474. [37]VANLOOY B,DEBACKERE K,ANDRIES P.Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university-industry collaboration:An analysis and an assessment[J].R&D management,2003,33 (2):209-229. [38]FREITAS I M B,VONTUNZELMANN N.Mapping public support for innovation:A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France[J].Research policy,2008,37 (9):1446-1464. [39]ROGERS E M.The nature of technology transfer[J].Science communication,2002,23 (3):323-341. [40]GOLDFARB B,HENREKSON M.Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property[J].Research policy,2003,32 (4):639-658. [41]LISSONI F,LLERENA P,MCKELVEY M,et al.Academic patenting in Europe:New evidence from the KEINS database[J].Research evaluation,2008,17 (2):87-102. [42]李玉清,田素妍,高江宁,等.德国技术转移工作经验及借鉴[J].中国高校科技,2014 (10):56-58. [43]JACOB M,LUNDQVIST M,HELLSMARK H.Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system:The case of Chalmers university of technology[J].Research policy,2003,32 (9):1555-1568. [44]ABETTI P A.Government-supported incubators in the Helsinki region,Finland:Infrastructure,results,and best practices[J].The journal of technology transfer,2004,29 (1):19-40. [45]吴寿仁.中国科技成果转化40年[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (10):1-15.
2019, 
