Abstract：The paper mined the cooperation information in winning projects of Guangdong provincial science and technology award in 2000—2016,and constructed the science and technology cooperation innovation network of Guangdong province by using social network(SNA),and then analyzed the overall structure characteristics and time sequence evolution process of cooperation network of institutions.The results show that:①the level of scientific and technological cooperation in Guangdong has been continuously improved,and the cooperation and innovation among various institutions have become the mainstream of innovation.②In the award-winning institutions,enterprises occupy the majority,and the number of private enterprises increases;the leading role of colleges and universities becomes increasingly prominent in scientific research innovation,the leading position of scientific research institutions is losing.③The structure of science and technology cooperation innovation network in Guangdong province presents the characteristics of“core-periphery”,the cooperation among innovation subjects is unbalanced.University occupies main position in the core layer,but research institutions have a tendency to stay away from the core layer,other institutions,such as enterprises and governments,are on the fringes of innovation network.
黄修杰, 姚飞, 储霞玲, 马力. 基于科技奖获奖项目的科研合作创新网络研究——以广东省为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(3): 19-28.
Huang Xiujie, Yao Fei, Chu Xialing, Ma Li. Research on cooperative innovation network based on Guangzhou Provincial Science and Technology Award. , 2019(3): 19-28.
[1]梁昊光.知识经济贡献度测度及其对北京城市发展的启示[J].地理研究,2014,33(9):1629-1635. [2]王秋玉,曾刚,吕国庆.中国装备制造业产学研合作创新网络初探[J].地理学报,2016,71(2):251-264. [3]PRICE D J DE S.Little science,big science[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1963:38-45. [4]BENJAMIN F J,STEFAN W,BRIAN U.Multi-university research teams:shifting impact,geography,and stratification in science[J].Science,2008,322(21):1259-1262. [5]PETER K,CHRISTOS P,LORRAlNE W.Developing the capacity of researchers for collaborative working[J].International journal for researcher development,2012(3):49-63. [6]NEWMAN M E J.Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific co-authorship networks[R].Working Papers,2004. [7]胡枫,赵海兴.基于超图结构的科研合作网络演化模型[J].物理学报,2013,62(19):1-8. [8]张洋,刘锦源.基于SNA的我国竞争情报领域论文合著网络研究[J].图书情报知识,2012(2):87-94. [9]李志宏,马倩.国内管理科学领域高校间学术论文合著网络的时间演化分析[J].管理工程学报,2013(4):126-136. [10]王黎萤,池仁勇.专利合作网络研究前沿探析与展望[J].科学学研究,2015,33(1):55-61. [11]刘凤朝,马荣康.基于“985高校”的产学研专利合作网络演化路径研究[J].科学学研究,2011(7):178-192. [12]LI Erling,YAO Fei,XI Jiaxin,et al.Evolution characteristics of government-industry-university-research cooperative innovation network for China′s agriculture and influencing factors:illustrated according to agricultural patent case[J].Chinese geographical science,2018,28(1):137-152. [13]朱云霞,魏建香.我国高校社会科学领域科研合作网络分析[J].情报科学,2014,32(3):144-149. [14]何贤芒,陈银东.基于项目合作的社会关系网络构建[J].计算机研究与发展,2016,53(4):776-784. [15]刘凤朝,刘靓.基于973计划项目资助的科研合作网络演变分析[J].科学学研究与科学技术管理,2013,34(6):14-21. [16]谭春辉,程凡.近15年国家科技进步奖获奖成果科研合作分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(11):19-25. [17]刘承良,桂钦昌.全球科研论文合作网络的结构异质性及其邻近性机理[J].地理学报,2017,72(4):737-752 [18]连燕华,王旭琴.从国家科技进步奖看我国技术创新发展态势[J].科技进步与对策,2006,26(23):116-118. [19]褚建勋,黄晟鹏.基于SNA的国家科技奖合作网络演化研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(8):1137-1144. [20]谭春辉,李思佳.基于国家科技进步奖获奖项目的学研产合作分析[J].科技管理研究,2017(2):97-83. [21]蒋展鸿,朱桂龙,曹浩生.行业因素如何影响产学研合作倾向——基于国家科技进步奖的数据分析[J].中国科技论坛,2014(2):104-101. [22]杨溯,刘强.科研合作网络及特性分析[J].科技管理研究,2016(1):73-78. [23]熊小刚.国家科技奖励制度运行绩效评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3):32-38. [24]王福涛.国家科技奖成果的转化与应用分析[J].中国科技论坛,2006(4):32-35. [25]刘军.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
2019, 
