Mechanisms of National Laboratories Focusing on Core Missions in Enterprise Collaboration:A Case Study of Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
Dai Guyue1, Zheng Qiren2, Meng Zhenyang2, Gao Liang2, Chan Junhao2
1. Department of Scientific Research,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China; 2. School of Public Affairs,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China
Abstract：To construct governance mechanisms for China's national laboratories to adhere to their core missions during collaborations with enterprises,this paper systematically analyzes the collaborative innovation management model of Germany's Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft.The study finds that the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft safeguards research leadership through a triple mechanism:the layered financial arrangement mechanism establishes a“one-third funding structure,”using base funding to guarantee strategic direction,competitive projects to validate research capabilities,and enterprise contracts to achieve scenario application,forming a dynamically balanced funding security system.The topic planning and guidance mechanism establishes a central research planning hub,employing a two-way topic generation model of“headquarters guidance + institute application”to ensure scientific research directions align with national strategies.The project admission and collaboration boundary mechanism implements strict project review processes,utilizing topic affiliation judgment and resource coordination review to prevent enterprise topics from interfering with the main research thrust.These three mechanisms synergize to form a closed-loop governance system from topic generation to outcome feedback.Based on this,it is proposed that China's national laboratories should establish a mission-oriented financial structure,build a unified topic planning system,and improve collaboration boundary management mechanisms,providing policy recommendations for effectively maintaining the national strategic scientific research attributes amidst deep enterprise collaboration.
戴古月, 郑奇仁, 孟振杨, 高亮, 产俊豪. 国家实验室在企业协作中聚焦核心使命的机制研究——以德国弗劳恩霍夫协会为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(7): 158-167.
Dai Guyue, Zheng Qiren, Meng Zhenyang, Gao Liang, Chan Junhao. Mechanisms of National Laboratories Focusing on Core Missions in Enterprise Collaboration:A Case Study of Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. , 2026(7): 158-167.
[1] 陈金辉,郭利杰,张丹,等.新形势下国家重点实验室的管理和评估机制研究[J].世界科技研究与发展,2024,46(2):211-225. [2] 吴丹丹,王子晨.中国国家实验室的演进历程、管理体制及运行机制探析[J].实验室研究与探索,2022,41(2):130-135. [3] 卜娜娜,王伊,任文硕.制度逻辑视角下国家实验室人才激励制度的困境与对策[J/OL].智库理论与实践,1-11[2025-11-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/10.1413.N.20250901.0837.002. [4] 戴古月,王峰,刘耀虎,等.国家实验室科研创新方向的导控机制研究[J].科研管理,2023,44(6):11-16. [5] 李晓华,李纪珍,杨若鑫.科技成果转化:研究评述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2023,45(4):119-136. [6] 温兴琦.中国企业主导的产学研深度融合发展历程[EB/OL].(2023-12-21)[2025-12-29].https://www.cssn.cn/glx/glx_llsy/202312/t20231221_5720342.shtml. [7] 北京科技成果转化服务中心.科技成果转化常见问题工作手册(2024年版)[R/OL].2024[2025-12-29].https://www.beijing.gov.cn/ywdt/gzdt/202411/P020241202584173529020.pdf. [8] 白春礼.人才与发展:国立科研机构比较研究.北京:科学出版社,2011. [9] 黄振羽.发挥新型举国体制优势 激活国家战略科技力量.(2025-08-22).https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202508/t20250822_5911987.shtml. [10] 西鹏,陈东阳,刘爽健.高校新型研发机构市场化能力建设研究:基于德国弗劳恩霍夫协会模式的思考[J].中国高校科技,2022(Z1):92-97. [11] 张杨,王志红,龚振炜,等.美、德国家级科研机构建设经验及启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2025,47(5):609-622. [12] 袁铭扬,谢润彬,牛标,等.弗劳恩霍夫模式对新型研发机构建设与运营的启示[J].新型工业化,2024,14(3):5-13. [13] FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT Fraunhofer Annual Report 2024[R/OL].(2025-06-05)https://www.fraunhofer.de/de/mediathek/publikationen/fraunhofer-jahresbericht/2024.html [14] 黄宁燕,孙玉明.从MP3案例看德国弗劳恩霍夫协会技术创新机制[J].中国科技论坛,2018(9):181-188. [15] Jakob E,Boon W P.‘The next generation of innovation policy:directionality and the role of demand-oriented instruments’—Introduction to the special section[J].Science and Public Policy,2018,45(4):433-434. [16] 张渤,王雪,孙从理.重组后的全国重点实验室科技经费配置政策研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(11):1698-1709. [17] Jakob E,Stefan K.Coordination within fragmentation:governance in knowledge policy in the German federal system[J].Science and Public Policy,2008,35(4):265-276. [18] Research Policy;Study Findings on Research Policy Are Outlined in Reports from P.Intarakumnerd and Colleagues(Role of Public Research Institutes In National Innovation Systems In Industrialized Countries:the Cases of Fraunhofer,Nist,Csiro,Aist,and Itri)[J].Politics & Government Week,2019. [19] Fraunhofer FOKUS.5G core network by Fraunhofer FOKUS compatible with radio technology of various manufacturers[EB/OL].(2020-06-17)[2025-12-29].https://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/en/ngni/news/open5gcore-campus-2020_06.html. [20] Intarakumnerd P,Goto A.Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries:the cases of Fraunhofer,NIST,CSIRO,AIST,and ITRI[J].Research Policy,2018,47(7):1309-1320. [21] 刘敬仪,廖宇.德国弗劳恩霍夫系统与创新研究所运作机制及思考[J].智库理论与实践,2020,5(6):88-94. [22] Edler J,Fagerberg J.Innovation policy:what,why,and how[J].Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2017,33(1):2-23. [23] Perkmann M,Tartari V,Mckelvey M,et al.Academic engagement and commercialisation:a review of the literature on university-industry relations[J].Research Policy,2013,42(2):423-442. [24] Corici M,Troudt E,Barth B,et al.Multi-3GPP Connectivity Concept,Architecture and Specific Implementation Details[C]//Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on 6G Networking(6GNet).Paris:IEEE,2024. [25] Cuhls K.Development and Perspectives of Foresight in Germany[J].TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis,2003,12(2):21-28. [26] Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI.Press Releases 2025 [EB/OL].(2025-03-04)[2025-08-24].https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/en/presse/2025.html. [27] HüLsbeck M,Lehmann E E,Starnecker A.Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany[J].The journal of technology transfer,2013,38(3):199-215. [28] Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA.Venture partnership[EB/OL].(2022-12-06)[2025-12-29].https://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de/en/cooperation/types-of-cooperation/venture-partnership.html.
2026, 
