Abstract：With the United States launching a“tariff war”globally,the trend of de-globalization has intensified. In this context,economic sanctions have been important tools in foreign-related legal contexts. The sanctions risk mainly lies in technology export controls,cyber and data security sanctions,and the expansion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. In the event of economic sanctions,the domestic remedies available to enterprises are often limited,while international investment agreements can provide some effective remedies from the aspects of investment protection and international investment arbitrations. Facing increasingly complex geopolitics,Chinese high-tech enterprises should closely pay attention to economic sanction risks and take preventive measures during the process of foreign investment. For example,enterprises need to pay close attention to the exception clauses of international investment agreements,invoke the principle of“international comity”in foreign courts,and establish a compliance system for preventing sanctions. When disputes occur,enterprises can seek remedies through recovery litigation within China to protect their legal interests.
张倩雯. 科技企业对外投资中的经济制裁风险与应对[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(5): 135-141.
Zhang Qianwen. The Risk of Economic Sanctions for High-Tech Enterprises in Outbound Investment and the Possible Responses. , 2026(5): 135-141.
[1] 张华.欧盟网络制裁机制的国际法透视[J].欧洲研究,2020(6):59-66. [2] U.S.Congressional Research Service.CFIUS reform under FIRRMA[R/OL].(2020-02-21)[2026-03-21].https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10952. [3] 董静然.美国数据安全单边经济制裁及其应对策略[J].河北法学,2025(3):111. [4] 杜涛.欧盟对待域外经济制裁的政策转变及其背景分析[J].德国研究,2012(3):20. [5] 张辉.单边制裁是否具有合法性:一个框架性分析[J].中国法学,2022(3):293. [6] 张倩雯.国际经贸条约对数据主权的建构:成因、模式与中国选择:基于数据跨境流动规则的研究[J].人权,2025(3):61-84. [7] WANG Y.Do not go gentle into that good night:The European Union's and China's different approaches to the extraterritorial application of artificial intelligence laws and regulations[J].Computer Law & Security Review,2024,53(105965):1-9. [8] 池志培.美国对华科技遏制战略的实施与制约[J].太平洋学报,2020(6):31-34. [9] 李峥.全球新一轮技术民族主义及其影响[J].现代国际关系,2021(3):35. [10] 徐庆超.俄乌冲突长期化及其对北极治理的溢出效应[J].当代世界,2022(7):49-53. [11] 刘道纪,高祥.美国次级制裁合法性问题研究[J].南京社会科学,2018(10):103. [12] 杨永红.次级制裁及其反制:由美国次级制裁的立法与实践展开[J].法商研究,2019(3):164. [13] CASEY C A.The International emergency economic powers act:Origins,evolution and use[M].Washington D.C.:Congressional Research Service,2024. [14] 郭华春.美国经济制裁执法管辖“非美国人”之批判分析[J].上海财经大学学报,2021(1):136. [15] DANIEL M.Caught in the economic crosshairs:Secondary sanctions and the American sanctions regime.Fordham Law Review,2020,89:1027. [16] REUTERS,India court rejects Xiaomi's challenge to $676 millionasset freezep[EB/OL].(2023-04-21)[2026-03-21].https://www.reuters.com/technology/india-court-rejects-xiaomis-challenge-676-mln-asset-freeze-live-law-2023-04-21/. [17] CAI C.New great powers and international law in the 21st century[J].European Journal of International Law,2013,24(3):755-795. [18] WEBER P M,SCHNEIDER G.Post-Cold War sanctioning by the EU,the UN,and the US:Introducing the EUSANCT Dataset[J].Conflict Management and Peace Science,2022,39(1):97-114. [19] LINDSAY J M.Trade sanctions as policy instruments:A re-examination[J].International Studies Quarterly,1986,30(2):153-173. [20] 彭岳.论美国跨境反垄断诉讼中的主权抗辩:从“维生素C案”谈起[J].法商研究,2014(1):25. [21] U.S.Department of justice ＆ federal trade commission,antitrust enforcement guidelines for international operations§3.32[R/OL].(1995-04-05)[2026-03-21].https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-enforcement-guidelines-international-operations. [22] 黄文旭,邹璞韬.反制国内法域外适用的工具:阻断法的经验及启示[J].时代法学,2021(4):88-98. [23] 李贤森.民事域外取证与数据出境监管的冲突及应对[J].比较法研究,2025(1):204-222. [24] HODA M J.The aérospatiale dilemma:Why US courts ignore blocking statutes and what foreign states can do about it[J].California Law Review,2018,106:231. [25] 张倩雯.国际投资中数据的性质判断及保护[J].法学,2024(7):178-182. [26] BOGDANOVA I,CALLO-MULLER M V.Unilateral cyber sanctions:Between questioned legality and normative value[J].Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,2021,54:911. [27] The American law institute,restatement(third)of the foreign relations law of the United States §712(f)[EB/OL].(1986-05-14)[2026-03-21].https://www.civil-taiwan.org/ReinstateSr.pdf. [28] 沈伟.金融制裁与反制裁中的国家能力建设[J].财经法学,2024(5):123. [29] 罗圣荣,刘明明.国际制裁的目的、条件、方式及其对中国参与国际制裁的启示[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2019(4):128. [30] MABERRY S.Overview of US economic sanctions[J].Currents:International Trade Law Journal,2008,17:52. [31] DODGE W S.International comity in American law[J].Columbia Law Review,2015,115:2071. [32] SWANSON S R.The vexatiousness of a vexation rule:International comity and antisuit injunctions[J].George Washington Journal International Law and Economics,1996,30:1. [33] DODGE W S.International comity in American law[J].Columbia Law Review,2015,115:2071. [34] 龚柏华.中美经贸摩擦背景下美国单边经贸制裁及其法律应对[J].经贸法律评论,2019(6):10. [35] 刘桂强.我国反制裁追偿诉讼制度面临的挑战与应对[J].环球法律评论,2023(3):211-224.
2026, 
