Abstract：Strengthening enterprise-led industry-university-research(IUR)collaboration is vital for the transformation of China's innovation system.By using the TOE framework with the Knowledge-Based View and data from listed firms(2008-2022),this study examines the impact of enterprise-led IUR on total factor productivity(TFP)and the moderating role of innovation network positions.Results indicate:(1)Enterprise-led IUR collaboration(frequency,breadth,and depth)has a U-shaped impact on TFP.(2)Innovation network centrality and structural holes positively moderate this relationship,indicated by a leftward shift of the inflection point and a steeper slope.(3)This effect is stronger when firms possess robust knowledge absorption and transformation capabilities and operate in moderately competitive industries.This study validates the enabling effect of enterprise-led IUR on high-quality development,substantiating the enterprises' principal status in innovation.
霍宜君, 杨棉之, 尚铎, 裴轩墨. 企业主导产学研合作能否提升全要素生产率？——基于创新网络位置的调节效应[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(4): 130-139.
Huo Yijun, Yang Mianzhi, Shang Duo, Pei Xuanmo. Can Enterprise-Led IUR Collaboration Enhance Total Factor Productivity?-The Moderating Effect of Enterprises' Position in the Innovation Network. , 2026(4): 130-139.
[1]黄速建,肖红军,王欣.论国有企业高质量发展[J].中国工业经济,2018(10):19-41. [2]黄勃,李海彤,刘俊岐,等.数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展:来自企业数字专利的证据[J].经济研究,2023,58(3):97-115. [3]王长峰.外部知识搜寻、控制机制与产学研合作创新绩效:基于NCA与SEM的混合方法[J].南开管理评论,2025,28(2):186-196. [4]龙小宁,刘灵子,张靖.企业合作研发模式对创新质量的影响:基于中国专利数据的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2023(10):174-192. [5]王靖宇,刘长翠,张宏亮.产学研合作与企业创新质量:内部吸收能力与外部行业特征的调节作用[J].管理评论,2023,35(2):147-155. [6]CHEN C,ZHANG J,DU A M,et al.University-industry collaboration and enterprise total factor productivity[J].International Review of Economics & Finance,2025,102:104311. [7]LEE S H,MUMINOV T K.R&D information sharing in a mixed duopoly and incentive subsidy for research joint venture competition[J].Bulletin of Economic Research,2021,73(2):154-170. [8]张杰,白铠瑞.中国高校基础研究与企业创新[J].经济研究,2022,57(12):124-142. [9]王晓东,徐冉.我国创新联合体牵头企业技术知识网络特征及其对创新产出的影响:基于专利引用和学术论文网络的实证[J].科学管理研究,2023,41(5):27-34. [10]原长弘,张树满.以企业为主体的产学研协同创新:管理框架构建[J].科研管理,2019,40(10):184-192. [11]ETZKOWITZ H.The triple helix:University-industry-government innovation in action[M].New York:Routledge,2008. [12]张羽飞,孙祺,李桂荣,等.产学研深度融合创新联合体:概念衍生、特征类型与推进路径[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(10):150-160. [13]杨帮兴,杜宝贵.TOE框架下企业科技创新主体地位驱动范式研究[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(22):1-12. [14]王钰莹,原长弘,张树满.企业产学研主体地位对创新绩效的影响:吸收能力的中介作用与双元情境的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(1):10-17. [15]郭菊娥,袁忆,张旭.边界跨越理论下企业主导产学研深度融合:权力配置与作用机制[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2025,45(3):104-116. [16]范佳颖,马艳艳.企业主导产学研合作与关键共性技术创新:结构性权力的调节效应[J].中国科技论坛,2024(2):61-70. [17]雷国雄,杨黎.主导合作、创新质量与企业全要素生产率[J].宏观质量研究,2024,12(5):72-86. [18]马艳艳,范佳颖,刘江南,等.企业科技创新主体地位的来源:一项结构性权力视角的实证[J].科研管理,2024,45(8):145-153. [19]戴鹭,廖辉,罗守贵,等.加强企业主导的产学研深度融合:高管学术经历视角[J].科学学研究,2024,42(11):2342-2354. [20]GRANT R M.Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(S2):109-122. [21]钱锡红,徐万里,杨永福.企业网络位置、间接联系与创新绩效[J].中国工业经济,2010(2):78-88. [22]赵炎,叶舟,韩笑.创新网络技术多元化、知识基础与企业创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2022,40(9):1698-1709. [23]ESMAELNEZHAD D,TAGHIZADEH-YAZDI M,MAHDIRAJI H A,et al.International strategic alliances for collaborative product innovation:An agent-based scenario analysis in biopharmaceutical industry[J].Journal of Business Research,2023,158:113663. [24]黄勃,李海彤,江萍,等.战略联盟、要素流动与企业全要素生产率提升[J].管理世界,2022,38(10):195-212. [25]文金艳,曾德明,徐露允,等.结构洞、网络多样性与企业技术标准化能力[J].科研管理,2020,41(12):195-203. [26]彭华涛,韩一佳,范丹.高价值专利知识网络嵌入与企业高质量发展:创业行为的调节作用[J].中国科技论坛,2025(1):78-87. [27]许江波,贾俊伟,肖土盛.“双自联动”与企业全要素生产率:基于开放与创新的协同视角[J].经济学动态,2024(10):58-74. [28]BURT R S.The contingent value of social capital[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(2):339-365. [29]杜传忠,薛宇择.研发联盟、开放式创新与企业全要素生产率提升[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(12):111-132. [30]LEVINSOHN J,PETRIN A.Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2003,70(2):317-341.
2026, 
