The Evolution Logic and Transformation Path of Risk Governance Paradigm for International Science and Technology Cooperation from the Perspective of Risk Society
Cui Yuhong, Shan Yi, Zhao Jintao
School of Education,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China
Abstract：Risk has emerged as the core logic governing modern social operations and a pivotal lens for observing social transformation.Unveiling the dilemmas of risk and the complex dynamics of governance paradigms within international science and technology(S&T)cooperation is a critical theoretical and practical challenge for China's S&T innovation cooperation system.Anchored in Risk Society Theory,this study develops an analytical framework based on the social construction of risk,reflexive reconstruction,and the“disembedding-re-embedding”adaptation mechanism to elucidate the internal logic of this transition.Historical evolution indicates that since World War II,the risk governance paradigm for international S&T cooperation has transitioned through three stages:a shaping period dominated by national security risks,a reflective period driven by global risks,and a transitional period characterized by the superposition of multiple risks.This process exhibits a cyclical pattern of“crisis trigger-risk perception update-governance mechanism adjustment.”The three-dimensional“Cognition-Power-Institution”framework,along with the triple-helix relationships of cognition-power coupling,institutional-power contestation and cognition-institution mutual construction,constitute the core drivers of paradigm shifts.Building on these findings,this paper proposes a transformative path for the risk governance paradigm involving innovation across four dimensions:governance subjects,domains,timing,and strategies.By establishing a trust ecosystem within multi-actor networks,global-local synergy across multi-dimensional spaces,proactive response mechanisms,and a balanced strategy between strategic competition and responsible innovation,this research aims to provide a theoretical foundation and policy recommendations for future governance practices.
崔宇红, 单怡, 赵锦涛. 风险社会视域下国际科技合作风险治理范式的变迁逻辑与转型路径[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(2): 141-149.
Cui Yuhong, Shan Yi, Zhao Jintao. The Evolution Logic and Transformation Path of Risk Governance Paradigm for International Science and Technology Cooperation from the Perspective of Risk Society. , 2026(2): 141-149.
[1]乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会:新的现代性之路[M].张文杰,何博闻,译.北京:译林出版社,2018. [2]文雯,崔亚楠,杨钰鑫.我国高校有组织国际科研合作的内涵、挑战及对策[J].中国高教研究,2024(8):32-39. [3]AKSNES D W,SIVERTSEN G.Global trends in international research collaboration,1980-2021[J].Journal of Data and Information Science,2023,8(2):26-42. [4]CHEN,K H,ZHANG Y,FU X L.International research collaboration:An emerging domain of innovation studies?[J].Research Policy,2019,48(1):149-168. [5]桂钦昌,杜德斌,刘承良.全球科研合作网络的动态演化及其驱动机制[J].地理学报,2023,78(2):423-442. [6]KITAJIMA K,OKAMURA K.The altering landscape of US-China science collaboration:From convergence to divergence[J].Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2025,12(1):1-11. [7]WOOLSTON C.Nature Index Annual Tables 2023:China tops natural-science table[J].Nature,2023. [8]陈嘉鑫,李宝诚.风险社会理论视域下生成式人工智能安全风险检视与应对[J].情报杂志,2025,44(1):128-135,171. [9]孟现玉.风险社会理论下人工智能时代的失业风险与法律治理.郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)[J],2024,57(4):56-63. [10]杨银.教育评价改革的风险及其治理:基于风险社会理论的思考[J].内蒙古社会科学,2023,44(4):203-212. [11]杨宁霞,唐爱民.教育数字化转型中的“数字利维坦”风险及其规制:基于风险社会理论的视角[J].中国电化教育,2024(9):86-94. [12]胡昳昀,范丽珺.后疫情时代高等教育国际化发展的风险及规避策略研究:基于风险社会理论的视角[J].高教探索,2021(5):12-19. [13]谢尔顿·克里姆斯基,多米尼克·戈尔丁.风险的社会理论学说[M].徐元玲,孟毓焕,徐玲等,译.北京:北京出版社,2005. [14]庞祯敬,邵而行.新兴技术风险的社会建构机理及治理路径研究[J/OL].科学学研究,1-21[2025-06-11].https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20250403.001. [15]赵延东.解读“风险社会”理论[J].自然辩证法研究,2007(6):80-83,91. [16]刘如.中美高技术脱钩的全球影响及应对措施[J].科技中国,2020(11):11-13. [17]梁帅,赵立新.风险社会情境下技术预见的内涵、挑战和实施框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42(3):64-75. [18]刘利乐.风险社会与责任伦理:以核威慑“有组织不负责任”难题的化解为视角[J].哲学动态,2024(2):104-113,126. [19]张惠彬,王怀宾.算法行政问责的机制与评估:基于欧美40份政策的实施分析[J].中国行政管理,2024(1):89-99. [20]方兴东,宋珂扬,钟祥铭.DeepSeek与科林格里奇困境:人工智能失控的风险机制及治理可能[J].新闻与写作,2025(5):51-59. [21]BEAVERD,ROSEN R.Studies in scientific collaboration:Part I.The professional origins of scientific co-authorship[J].Scientometrics,1978,1(1):65-84. [22]KATZ J S,MARTIN B R.What is research collaboration?[J].Research policy,1997,26(1):1-18. [23]C.赖特·米尔斯.社会学的想象力[M].李康,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2017. [24]PETERS M A.The rise of global science and the emerging political economy of international research collaborations.European Journal of Education,2006,41(2):225-244. [25]吴杨.大科学时代基础研究多元投入的路径探索[J].学术前沿,2023(9):68-80. [26]默顿.科学社会学[M].鲁旭东,林聚任,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003. [27]查尔斯·赖特·米尔斯.权力精英[M].许荣,王崑,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004. [28]WALLERSTEIN I M.The modern world-system I:Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century[M].New York:Academic Press,1974. [29]VIEIRA E S,CERDEIRA J,TEIXEIRA A A C.Which distance dimensions matter in international research collaboration? A cross-country analysis by scientific domain[J].Journal of Informetrics,2022,16(2):101259. [30]ADAMS J.The rise of research networks[J].Nature,2012,490(7420):335-336. [31]WAGNER C S,PARK H W,LEYDESDORFF L.The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research:A conundrum for national governments[J].PloS one,2015,10(7):e0131816. [32]MARGINSON S.What drives global science? The four competing narratives[J].Studies in Higher Education,2022,47(8):1566-1584. [33]MATCH C,SCHIEFERDECKER I.Technological sovereignty as ability,not autarky[J].International Studies Review,2023,25(2):viad012. [34]XIE Y,LIN X H,LI J,et al.Caught in the crossfire:Fears of Chinese-American scientists[J].The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(PNAS),2023,120(27). [35]CHINCHILLA-RODRIGUEZ Z,SUGIMOTO C R,LARIVIERE V.Follow the leader:On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations[J].PloS one,2019,14(6):e0218309. [36]ABRAMO G,D'ANGELO C A,DICOSTA F.How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour[J].Scientometrics,2022,127(8):5053-5071. [37]崔宇红,王飒.新型冠状病毒突发公共卫生事件中的数据共享机制研究[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(15):104-111. [38]HAUPT J P,LEE J J.Scientific collaboration formation:Network mechanisms,bonding social capital,and particularized trust in US-China collaboration on COVID-19-related research.Higher Education,2024,87(6):1921-1936. [39]郭凤林,彭慧.美国对华科技遏制对全球科技合作的影响:基于社会网络视角的分析[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2025(3):101-111. [40]胡雯,鲍悦华.技术政治时代下中美国际科技合作的战略转向比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2024(2):168-179. [41]MOSCOVITZ H,SABZALIEVA E.Conceptualising the new geopolitics of higher education[J].Globalisation,Societies and Education,2023,21(2):149-165. [42]吴逸菲,樊春良.创新系统视角下美国国家人工智能战略的演化逻辑及趋势分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45(7):29-48. [43]PETERS M A.The rise of global science and the emerging political economy of international research collaborations[J].European Journal of Education,2006,41(2):225-244.
2026, 
