Abstract：The formation of innovation outcomes is a complex system engineering and a process of overall change and innovation for basic research systems.System innovation is a cross-domain policy approach to build a new socio-technical system through the synergistic interaction of elements in the system.Based on the multi-level perspective analysis framework,this paper focuses on the basic research socio-technical system of basic research in China,taking 30 provinces as case samples,and uses fsQCA to explore the factor configuration and path patterm of multi-level factors synergistic driving innovation of basic research socio-technical system.The research findings are as follows.①There are two paths to drive on innovation of basic research named as knowledge-based driven model with non-high personnel input intensity and infrastructure promoted model with high scientific and creative cultural atmosphere,including 5 driving paths.②“Efficient factor input + strong knowledge base”,“good scientific and creative culture atmosphere + perfect scientific research infrastructure”can contribute to high innovation performance on basic research socio-technical system.③“Efficient factor input”has the largest driving effect on innovation of basic research socio-technical system,followed by“knowledge base”,“scientific research infrastructure”and“science and innovation incubation”.The scientific and innovation cultural atmosphere mainly plays an auxiliary role.This paper expands the application scenarios of the multi-level perspective analysis framework and enriches the theoretical achievement of innovation for basic research system in Chinese context.
李慧, 肖云杰, 张薇玮. 多层级视角下基础研究社会-技术系统创新的组态路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(6): 55-65.
Li Hui, Xiao Yunjie, Zhang Weiwei. Research on Configuration Path of Innovation for Basic Research Socio-Technical System: Based on Multi-level Perspective. , 2025(6): 55-65.
[1] 张善良.科技创新视阈下基础研究创新成果的形成机理与创新生态模型[J].中国科技论坛,2020(7):73-81. [2] OECD.System innovation:Synthesis report[R].Paris:OECD,2015. [3] 隋映辉.知识递增、系统障碍与系统创新[J].国际技术经济研究,1999(4):11-18. [4] 隋映辉.系统创新:非技术因素与战略调整[J].学术研究,2001(10):41-44. [5] GEELS F W,SCHOT J.Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways[J].Research Policy,2007,36(3):399-417. [6] 李慧,肖云杰.多层级视角下基础研究社会-技术系统的主体、要素及作用机制[J].中国科技论坛,2024(3):30-39,49. [7] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):155-167. [8] GEELS F W.A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions:Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies[J].Journal of Transport Geography,2012,24(3):471-482. [9] 薛奕曦,王卓莉,史红斌.社会-技术转型核心分析框架研究:理论演化、关键内容与研究展望[J].管理现代化,2020,40(6):57-62. [10] FISS P C.building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420. [11] 伯努瓦·里豪克斯,查尔斯C.拉金.QCA设计原理与应用:超越定性与定量研究的新方法[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2017. [12] 任嵘嵘,郑念,邢钢.科普与科技进步关联性研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(S1):290-295. [13] 许倞,梁颖达.中国科学技术指标 2020[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2021. [14] MENG W,HU Z H,LIU W B.Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China[J].Scientometrics,2006,69(1):85-101. [15] 杨立岩,潘慧峰.人力资本、基础研究与经济增长[J].经济研究,2003(4):72-78. [16] 苏屹,李柏洲,喻登科.区域创新系统知识存量的测度与公平性研究[J].中国软科学,2012(5):157-174. [17] 何郁冰,伍静.中国省域基础研究效率的空间分布及其影响因素:基于空间面板数据模型的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31(6):126-138. [18] 姜群.基于DEA-malmquist的基础研究投入效率及其影响因素研究[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(3):35-41. [19] 范旭,李蓓黎.科研机构基础科研创新效率评价及提升研究[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(15):117-126. [20] 吴杨,蔡青.中国基础研究创新效率的区域差异性评估[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):57-68. [21] 吴杨,徐秀丽,沈梦玲.“双一流”建设大学基础研究创新效率测量及投入产出结构合理性研究:基于“十一五”至“十三五”期间数据观测[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(6):53-60. [22] 李燕,李应博.中国大学基础研究效率分析:基于贝叶斯随机前沿的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(22):68-70. [23] 吴杨.中国基础研究状态评估与未来预测:基于“十一五”至“十三五”期间基础研究创新绩效与发展潜力的动态监测[J].中国科技论坛,2022(11):25-34. [24] 钟永恒,刘佳,孙源,等.中国基础研究竞争力报告2022[M].北京:科学出版社,2023. [25] RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2009. [26] 李慧,涂家豪,郭丕斌.社会-技术景观驱动能源系统低碳转型机理研究[J].软科学,2023,37(12):57-64. [27] CODURAS A,ANTONIO CLEMENTE J,RUIZ J.A novel application of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to GEM data[J].Journal of Business Research,2016,69(4):1265-1270. [28] 杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度:基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155. [29] 陶克涛,张术丹,赵云辉.什么决定了政府公共卫生治理绩效:基于QCA方法的联动效应研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(5):128-138. [30] SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:A guide to qualitative comparative analysis[J].International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2013,16(2):165-169. [31] 张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报,2019,16(9):1312-1323.
2025, 
