Impact of the Proportion of Investment in Basic Research and Applied Research on Scientific and Technological Innovation ——Evidence From 36 OECD Countries
Yang Fei, Zhong Shuhua
School of Public Administration,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China
Abstract：Taking the data of 36 OECD countries from 2011 to 2020 as the research sample,the two-way fixed-effect model was applied to discuss the impact of the proportion of basic research and applied research investment on scientific and technological innovation,and the composition range of researchers and funding investment was analyzed.It is found that an increase in proportion of basic researchers does not significantly enhance the scientific and technological innovation capacity of OECD countries,but it significantly enhances the scientific and technological innovation capacity of countries with low institutional environment level and high-income.An increase in proportion of basic research funding significantly weakens the scientific and technological innovation capacity of OECD countries,and has a more significant negative impact on the scientific and technological innovation capacity of countries with low institutional environment level and non-top ten economic scale.In the proportion of basic research and applied researchers,the average proportion of“low-high” type is 3:7,while the average proportion of“high-low” type is 6:4.In the proportion of basic research funding and innovation output index,the average research funding proportion of“low-high”type is 3:7,while the average research funding proportion of“high-high” type is 5:5.
杨菲, 钟书华. 基础研究与应用研究投入构成比例对科技创新的影响——来自36个OECD国家的证据[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(1): 147-157.
Yang Fei, Zhong Shuhua. Impact of the Proportion of Investment in Basic Research and Applied Research on Scientific and Technological Innovation ——Evidence From 36 OECD Countries. , 2024(1): 147-157.
[1]严成樑.基础研究,应用研究与最优R&D配置[J].系统科学与数学,2013,33(8):879-891. [2]潘龙飞.基础研究定义的社会建构[J].自然辩证法研究,2021,37(8):57-62. [3]GULBRANDSEN M,KYVIK S.Are the concepts basic research,applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics[J].Science and public policy,2010,37(5):343-353. [4]石国进,龚耘.科学是平的——“汤浅现象”新解[J].科学学研究,2012,30(12):1770-1780,1769. [5]GERSBACH H,SORGER G,AMON C.Hierarchical growth:basic and applied research[J].Journal of economic dynamics and control,2018,90:434-459. [6]UFUK A,DOUGLAS H,NICOLAS S.Back to basics:basic research spillovers,innovation policy and growth[J].The review of economic studies,2021,88(1):1-43. [7]HENARD D H,MCFADYEN M A.The complementary roles of applied and basic research:a knowledge-based perspective[J].Journal of product innovation management,2010,22(6):503-514. [8]孙早,许薛璐.前沿技术差距与科学研究的创新效应——基础研究与应用研究谁扮演了更重要的角色[J].中国工业经济,2017(3):5-23. [9]ROMER P M.Endogenoustechnological change[J].Journal of political economy,1990,98(5):S71-S102. [10]胡绪华,吕程扬,丁绪辉.基础研究与应用研究对地区经济高质量发展的异质性作用:基于“中等收入陷阱风险”视角[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(1):60-68. [11]王文,孙早.基础研究还是应用研究:谁更能促进TFP增长:基于所有制和要素市场扭曲的调节效应分析[J].当代经济科学,2016,38(06):23-33+123. [12]孙晓华,王昀.何种类型的研发投资更有利于提高一国生产率?来自OECD国家的经验证据[J].科学学研究,2014,32(2):203-210. [13]张小筠.基于增长视角的政府R&D投资选择:基础研究或是应用研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(9):1598-1608. [14]CZARNITZKI D,THORWARTH S.Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries[J].Research policy,2012,41(9):1555-1564. [15]PAVITT K.Sectoral patterns of technical change:towards a taxonomy and a theory[J].Research policy,1984,13(6):343-373. [16]夏建白.基础研究是中国科学院发展的土壤和驱动力[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(4):427-428. [17]李政,王思霓.基础研究与应用研究的产业创新效应[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,74(5):91-104. [18]生延超,欧阳峣.基础研究还是应用研究:后发大国创新方式及创新领域选择[J].中国科技论坛,2017(10):16-25. [19]MARTINEZ-SENRA I A,QUINTAS A M,SARTAL A,et al.How can firms’ basic research turn into product innovation? The role of absorptive capacity and industry appropriability[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2015,62(2):205-216. [20]曾德明,赵胜超,叶江峰,等.基础研究合作、应用研究合作与企业创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2021,39(8):1485-1497. [21]FAN X,YANG X,YU Z.Effect of basic research and applied research on the universities’ innovation capabilities:the moderating role of private research funding[J].Scientometrics,2021,126:5387-5411. [22]OECD.Revised field of science and technology classification in the Frascati manual[R/OL].(2007-02-26)[2023-04-28].https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf. [23]BERBEGAL-MIRABENT J,SABATE F.Balancing basic and applied research outputs:a study of the trade-offs between publishing and patenting[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2015,27(10):1143-1158. [24]艾永芳,佟孟华,孙光林.文化差异、制度环境和科技创新:基于跨国视角的比较分析[J].经济问题探索,2017(12):50-61. [25]李涛,张璋.科技创新能力与国家位势关系研究:基于结构方程模型的量化分析[J].中国软科学,2014(2):90-99. [26]周俊亭,席彦群,周媛媛.区域技术市场、政府扶持与科技创新[J].中国软科学,2021(11):80-90. [27]杜英,李睆玲.基于子系统协同度评价的区域科技创新能力测度:以甘肃省为例[J].中国科技论坛,2021(2):91-99. [28]BEIS.UK research and development roadmap[R/OL].(2020-07-01)[2022-08-12].https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/896799/UK_Research_and_Development_Roadmap pdf. [29]FGG.Artificial intelligence strategy[R].Berlin:FGG,2018. [30]FRANK D L.Securing American leadership in science and technology act of 2021[R/OL].(2021-03-19)[2022-08-12].https://republicans-science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/SALSTA%202021%20Text%20SIGNED pdf . [31]MESRI.Lancement du 4e programme d'investissements d'avenir en janvier 2021:20 Md€ dans la recherche et l'innovation en faveur des générations futures[R/OL].(2021-05-28)[2023-04-27].https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/lancement-du-4e-programme-d-investissements-d-avenir-en-janvier-2021-20-mdeu-dans-la-recherche-et-l-49317. [32]BMBF.2020 high-tech strategy of Germany[R/OL].(2010-07-14)[2022-11-04].https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/germanys-high-tech-strategy-2020/31361/. [33]王鑫静,程钰,丁立,等.“一带一路”沿线国家科技创新对碳排放效率的影响机制研究[J].软科学,2019,33(6):72-78. [34]RUSSELL J M,GALINA C S.Basic and applied research in developing countries:the search for an evaluation strategy[J].Knowledge and policy,1998,10(4):102-113. [35]贝尔纳.科学的社会功能[M].陈体芳,译.北京:商务印书馆,1995.
2024, 
