Comparative Study on Evaluation System of Scientific Instrument Platforms
Wang Xiaobo1, Mu Chao1, Li Jinyu2
1. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and resources,Chinese Academy of Science,Lanzhou 730000,China; 2. Institute of Modern Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China
Abstract：With continuous increases in technological investment,scientific instrument platforms(SIPs),as a current type of indispensable social organization,have garnered widespread attention in conjunction with open and sharing operation and its administrative department evaluation.However,the evaluation system surrounding the open and sharing operation of SIPs requires further investigation to clarify the utility and practical implications of the evaluation work.Taking the SIPs affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences as an example,based on the published open and sharing evaluation results of the management department from Ministry of Science and Technology,this study conducts a ranking analysis and causal logic research from the perspective of efficiency and effectiveness evaluation.The aim is to examine the differences in evaluation results under different evaluation methods,dissecting the rationality and applicability of the evaluation system.The results indicate that different evaluation systems correspond to different outcomes,with the current evaluation by the management department focusing on the open,utilization,and sharing rates of instruments and equipment,while also considering the construction and stability of the experimental technical talent team.The main reason for these differences lies in the diverse weightings assigned to multiple attribute indicators by different evaluation systems.The conclusion provides a reference for the improvement of the evaluation system for SIPs,offering rational guidance for their efficient and stable operation and performance enhancement,and serving as a decision-making basis for optimizing the allocation of innovative resources and improving efficiency.
王肖波, 穆超, 李锦钰. 科研仪器平台评价体系的比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(3): 40-49.
Wang Xiaobo, Mu Chao, Li Jinyu. Comparative Study on Evaluation System of Scientific Instrument Platforms. , 2024(3): 40-49.
[1]路甬祥.关于中国科学院技术支撑系统建设工作的几点思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2008(6):481-484. [2]刘垠.开放共享让大型科研仪器“忙”起来[N].科技日报,2023-02-10(1). [3]王晋.强化管理机制,推进科研设施与仪器开放共享[J].分析测试技术与仪器,2020,26(1):1-2. [4]喻思南.优化配置资源,促进科技创新[N].人民日报,2022-12-08(13). [5]WANG X B,ZHAO X R,ZHANG C X.An attribute-based evaluation framework for sustainable scientific instruments platforms[J].Sustainability,2021,13(21):11842. [6]徐大海.大型科学仪器设备共享效率评价研究[J].实验技术与管理,2017,34(1):263-267. [7]关苑君,容婵,梁翠莎,等.科研型仪器平台共享服务评价框架要素与构建[J].实验室研究与探索,2020,39(6):268-272. [8]科技部办公厅.国家重大科研基础设施和大型科研仪器开放共享评价考核实施细则[EB/OL].(2022-07-05).https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2022/202207/t20220705_181462.html,2023-02-07. [9]NDUBISI N O,MUMIN D,YENIARAS V,et al.The effects of complementarity of knowledge and capabilities on joint innovation capabilities and service innovation:the role of competitive intensity and demand uncertainty[J].Industrial marketing management,2020,89:196-208. [10]王肖波.大型科研仪器平台的可持续管理[J].分析测试技术与仪器,2020,26(3):196-203. [11]王肖波,汪健,赵莉.科研仪器平台的运行效率评价:两阶段数据包络分析视角[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(12):57-63. [12]关忠诚,张炎.科研组织相对效率评价定量方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2003(5):90-95. [13]DE BLAS C S,MARTIN J S,GONZALEZ D G.Combined social networks and data envelopment analysis for ranking[J].European journal of operational research,2018,266(3):990-999. [14]张文瑾,王润.大型科学仪器资源共享平台绩效评价机制研究——以重庆大型科学仪器资源共享平台为例[J].中国基础科学,2016,18(4):44-48,56. [15]吴洁演.大型科研仪器设备开放共享的绩效评价研究[J].行政事业资产与财务,2021(19):31-34. [16]AMADO C A F,SANTOS S P,MARQUES P M.Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the balanced scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment[J].Omega,2012,40(3):390-403. [17]屠建平,杨雪.基于电子商务平台的供应链融资模式绩效评价研究[J].管理世界,2013,238(7):182-183. [18]廖少纲,谢文栋.基于BSC-AHP模型的科技创新服务平台运行绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(14):64-71. [19]李玥,郭波波,武川,等.区域科技资源共享平台集成服务能力结构维度研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(2):20-28. [20]LOZANO R.Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems:an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives[J].Journal of cleaner production,2012,25:14-26. [21]DENG D Q,WEN S B,CHEN F H,et al.A hybrid multiple criteria decision making model of sustainability performance evaluation for Taiwanese certified public accountant firms[J].Journal of cleaner production,2018,180:603-616. [22]苏朝晖,苏梅青.科技创新平台服务质量评价——对福州、厦门、泉州三地的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(4):92-99. [23]吴斌,李鑫,邬平,等.基于共享服务数据的科研仪器共享平台用户满意度评价实证研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021(1):17-23. [24]科技部办公厅,财政部办公厅.关于发布中央级高校和科研院所等单位重大科研基础设施和大型科研仪器开放共享评价考核结果的通知[EB/OL].(2019-11-20).https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2019/201911/t20191120_150067.html,2023-02-07. [25]TER BRAAK C J F,SMILAUER P.Canoco reference manual and user's guide:software for ordination[M].Ithaca:Microcomputer Power,2012. [26]MUTHEN L K,MUTHEN B.Mplus user's guide:Statistical analysis with latent variables[M].Los Angeles:Muthén & Muthén,2017.
2024, 
