A Quantitatively Comparative Study of Quantum Communication Industrial Innovation Policies Between European Union and the United States
Tang Delong1, Ma Xiang1, Liao Siai2, Ding Kun1, Xu Zuosheng2,3
1.Institution of Science of Science and S&T Management and WISE Lab,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China; 2.Institute of S&T management,National Chiao Tung University,Hsinchu 30010,China; 3.Research Center for Technological Innovation,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
Abstract：Based on the industrial innovation policy tool theory and industrial value chain theory,this paper makes a quantitative comparative analysis of policy texts among Quantum Manifesto,Quantum Technologies Flagship Final Report,Advancing Quantum Information Science:National Challenges And Opportunities,National Strategic Overview For Quantum Information Science,which are respectively issued by the European Union and the United States,to analyze the interaction between government policy and quantum industry market,as well as technology and industry chain.The results show that the European Union is inclined to make use of the supply-side policy tools,mainly through the expansion of public services and the promotion of industrial innovation to obtain financial support.The United States pays more attention to the supply-side policy tools so that takes education and training as important administrative measures to cultivate more interdisciplinary talents to lay the foundation for quantum commercialization.Public policy is the fundamental reason to support the successful realization of technological innovation in Chinese quantum industry.Finally,some implications are put forward for the implementation and improvement of Chinese quantum industrial innovation policies through the comparative analysis of European and American quantum industrial innovation policies.
唐德龙, 马翔, 廖思爱, 丁堃, 徐作圣. 欧美量子通信产业创新政策量化比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(4): 160-170.
Tang Delong, Ma Xiang, Liao Siai, Ding Kun, Xu Zuosheng. A Quantitatively Comparative Study of Quantum Communication Industrial Innovation Policies Between European Union and the United States. , 2020(4): 160-170.
[1]MUKAI T.Security enhanced memory for quantum state[J].Scientific reports,2017,7 (1):6667. [2]LI Y H,ZHOU Z Y,FENG L T,et al.On-chip multiplexed multiple entanglement sources in a single silicon nanowire[J].Physical review applied,2017,7 (6):064005. [3]PU Y F,JIANG N,CHANG W,et al.Experimental realization of a multiplexed quantum memory with 225 individually accessible memory cells[J].Nature communications,2017 (8):15359. [4]SETZPFANDT F,SOLNTSEV A S,SUKHORUKOV A A.Nonlocal splitting of photons on a nonlinear chip[J].Optics letters,2016,41 (23):5604-5607. [5]MATHEW J P,PATEL R N,BORAH A,et al.Dynamical strong coupling and parametric amplification in mechanical modes of graphene drums[J].Nature nanotechnology,2016,11 (9):747-751. [6]贺天平.量子力学多世界解释的哲学审视[J].中国社会科学,2012 (1):49-62+208. [7]兰立山,潘平.量子博弈中的理性选择及其哲学意义[J].自然辩证法通讯,2017 (5):35-39. [8]吴国林,黄灵玉.计算复杂性、量子计算及其哲学意义[J].自然辩证法研究,2007 (1):22-26. [9]陈建翔.量子教育学:一百年前 “量子爆破”的现代回声[J].教育研究,2003 (11):4-11. [10]徐作圣.全球科技政策与企业经营[M].台北:华泰文化,1995. [11]LIN Chen-Chun,YANG Chia-han,SHYU J Z.A comparison of innovation policy in the smart grid industry across the pacific:China and the USA[J].Energy policy,2013 (57):119-132. [12]徐作圣,林葴均,王仁圣.产业分析与创新[M].台北:全华图书出版社,2015. [13]张冬梅,胡冬雪.科技政策理论及研究综述[J].世界科学,2011 (7):52-54. [14]苏英.创新政策理论基础的演变及启示[J].科技创新导报,2010 (33):232-233. [15]周作宇.协同创新政策的理论分析[J].高教发展与评估,2013,29 (1):1-17. [16]李凡,李娜,刘沛罡.中印技术创新政策演进比较研究——基于目标,工具和执行的定量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (10):23-31. [17]汪涛,安暄.类定量化科技政策文本分析框架构建及北京市科技政策演进分析[J].技术经济,2011 (6):17-19+36. [18]王春梅.南京创新发展的政策演化研究——基于南京2003—2012年创新政策的文本分析[J].中共南京市委党校学报,2014 (3):105-109. [19]苏竣.公共科技政策导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2014. [20]LIU Kuan-Chung,SHYU Joseph Z,DING Kun.A cross-strait comparison of innovation policy under industry 4.0 and sustainability development transition[J].Sustainbility,2017,9 (5):786. [21]黄萃,徐磊,钟笑天,等.基于政策工具的政策-技术路线图 (P-TRM)框架构建与实证分析——以中国风机制造业和光伏产业为例[J].中国软科学,2014 (5):81-89. [22]ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Industrial innovation and public policy:preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[M].London:Frances Printer,1981. [23]谢青,田志龙.创新政策如何推动中国新能源汽车产业的发展——基于政策工具与创新价值链的政策文本分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015 (6):5-16. [24]PORTER M E.The competitive advantage of nations[M].New York:Free Press,2006. [25]黄钢,徐玖平,李颖.科技价值链及创新主体链接模式[J].中国软科学,2006 (6):72-80. [26]任志成.战略性新兴产业创新价值链锻造方向选择研究[J].南京社会科学,2013 (6):28-35. [27]徐作圣,邱奕嘉,郑志强.产业经营与创新政策[M].台北:全华图书出版社,2003. [28]BAMFIELD P.The innovation chain,research and development management in the chemical and pharma-ceutical industry[M].2nd ed.Weinheim:Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.,2004. [29]刘家树,菅利荣.知识来源、知识产出与科技成果转化绩效——基于创新价值链的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32 (6):33-40. [30]余泳泽,刘大勇.创新价值链视角下的我国区域创新效率提升路径研究[J].科研管理,2014 (5):29-39.
2020, 
