Abstract：Amid rapid technological innovation and industrial transformation,the science and technology service industry has become a key bridge between innovation and industrial upgrading.Based on dynamic capabilities theory,this study examines five leading global firms—IBM,Thermo Fisher Scientific,Danaher,Accenture,and Infosys—to explore their growth drivers and evolution.The findings show a common path of demand orientation,long-term accumulation,technology-driven growth,strategic transformation,and value leap.Their growth is shaped by the dynamic interaction of vision,capabilities,and resources,forming a self-reinforcing capability loop.Four regularities are identified:demand-capability coupling,dynamic capability renewal,ecosystem positioning and feedback,and diversified growth strategies.Together,these mechanisms form a cycle linking demand cognition,technological realization,and market transformation.The study suggests that Chinese science and technology service firms should adopt asymmetric strategies,strengthen knowledge accumulation,enhance supply-demand coupling and ecosystem synergy,and move from follower-based growth to leading innovation.
陈强, 吴诗. 动态能力视角下科技服务业头部企业成长规律研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(6): 98-106.
Chen Qiang, Wu Shi. Growth Patterns of Leading Firms in the Science and Technology Service Industry:A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. , 2026(6): 98-106.
[1] 王羽,侯凯文.做大做强做优科技服务业,助力新质生产力加快形成[EB/OL].(2023-10-29)[2025-08-08].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/At9B3yI_wGW35qUrEK7KXg. [2] 工业和信息化部,国家发展改革委,教育部,等.关于加快推进科技服务业高质量发展的实施意见[EB/OL].(2025-05-19)[2025-08-10].https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202505/content_7024307.htm. [3] 王宏起,王冕,李玥.生态关系视角下区域科技服务业构成及持续发展研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021(1):117-126. [4] DINU E.Bridging intellectual capital management,technological orientation,innovativeness and innovative performance in KIBS:A new perspective[J].Journal of Intellectual Capital,2025,26(2):526-561. [5] MAGNI D,PAPA A,SCUOTTO V,et al.Internationalized knowledge-intensive business service(KIBS)for servitization:A microfoundation perspective[J].International Marketing Review,2023,40(4):798-826. [6] 孙颖,梁蕾,毛维.中国科技服务企业创新有效性水平测度与省际比较:基于三维并进视角[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(7):94-102. [7] 杜宝贵,陈磊.科技服务业产出测算:指标确立、数据收集与未来预测[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(13):110-117. [8] LI T,TAO S.Correction:Did China’s regional planning policies promote employment in the science and technology services sector[J].Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2025,12(1):1-11. [9] 许晓安,谢伟胜,卢洪,等.国内外科技服务业发展模式对珠三角的启示[J].科技创新发展战略研究,2022,6(3):41-46. [10] 贺正楚,蔡湘杰,潘为华.数字经济、科技服务业的协同发展及区域协同效应[J].科研管理,2024,45(3):133-142. [11] 潘柳榕,黄林,罗映明.国际陆海贸易新通道下西部六省科技服务业竞争力:测度与对策[J].资源开发与市场,2025,41(5):731-739. [12] 黄晓琼,徐飞.科技服务业与高技术产业协同集聚创新效应:理论分析与实证检验[J].中国科技论坛,2021(3):93-102. [13] 胡续楠,高维龙,王金翎.中国科技服务业发展水平测度与时空演化探析[J].科技智囊,2025(2):10-18. [14] 鲁曦,姜楠.我国科技服务业发展及标准化研究[J].中国质量与标准导报,2022(3):106-111. [15] TEECE D J,PISANO G,SHUEN A.Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533. [16] 吴先明,苏志文.将跨国并购作为技术追赶的杠杆:动态能力视角[J].管理世界,2014(4):146-164. [17] 何欣,陈欣,兰卉.环境动荡性影响下的中小企业动态能力微观基础:中美企业的多案例研究[J].管理案例研究与评论,2023,16(3):291-305. [18] KARADAG R,POPPO L.Strategic resource decay[J].Strategic Management Journal,2023,44(6):1534-1561. [19] 徐海卿,云乐鑫,董晓语.制造业企业数字创新生态系统治理体系研究:基于动态能力视角[J].管理评论,2025,37(4):276-288. [20] PEDOTA M.Big data and dynamic capabilities in the digital revolution:The hidden role of source variety[J].Research Policy,2023,52(7):104812. [21] PITELIS C N,TEECE D J,YANG H.Dynamic capabilities and MNE global strategy:A systematic literature review-based novel conceptual framework[J].Journal of Management Studies,2024,61(7):3295-3326. [22] CAVUSGIL S T,DELIGONUL S Z.Dynamic capabilities framework and its transformative contributions[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2025,56(1):33-42. [23] EISENHARDT K M,GRAEBNER M E.Theory building from cases:Opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of management journal,2007,50(1):25-32.
2026, 
