Abstract：While cloud computing propels the leap of new quality productive forces through a flexible,efficient,and cost-effective mechanism for allocating computing resources,it also inevitably generates monopoly risks arising from the combined effects of technology lock-in,economic barriers,data dominance and ecosystem foreclosure.The current governance framework has failed to offer an effective response in terms of rules,instruments and institutional arrangements.Collaborative governance centered on regulatory agility,polycentric co-governance and multi-objective calibration shows a natural fit with these risks.Going forward,a collaborative governance approach should be maintained in addressing monopoly risks in cloud computing:improving ex-ante regulatory regimes to reshape fair and open market rules;strengthening in-process dynamic monitoring to enable agile governance aligned with technological evolution;refining antitrust analytical frameworks to enhance the applicability and effectiveness of antitrust enforcement;and building a co-governance structure featuring government leadership,corporate self-regulation,and societal oversight to form an end-to-end governance system,thereby providing robust institutional support for the sustained innovation and sound development of the cloud computing industry.
[1]国家数据局.全国数据资源调查报告(2024年)[R/OL].(2025-04-29)[2025-09-10].https://www.nda.gov.cn/sjj/ywpd/sjzy/0429/20250429190723758925417_pc.html. [2]罗先觉,胡桂生.云计算用户数据迁移的困境及其解决路径[J].科技与法律,2013(1):28-33. [3]岳琳,唐素琴,韩伟.云计算产业的反垄断规制[J].中国物价,2013(8):19-22. [4]The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets.Market study cloud services[R].The Hague:The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets,2022. [5]Office of Communications.Cloud services market study[R].London:Ofcom,2023. [6]刘佳.云计算产业中市场支配地位的认定[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,32(2):24-30. [7]Japan Fair Trade Commission.Report on trade practices in cloud services sector[R].Tokyo:JFTC,2022. [8]Autorité de la concurrence.On competition in the cloud sector[R].Paris:Autorité de la concurrence,2023. [9]丁珈,万国华,井润田,等.云计算生态系统的价值共创实现机制:基于软件供应商云计算服务的案例研究[J].管理科学学报,2025,28(8):157-174. [10]COESTIER A.Cloud pricing models explained:A guide to understanding your options[EB/OL].(2024-09-19)[2025-09-02].Exoscale,https://www.exoscale.com/syslog/cloud-pricing-models/. [11]BELMANS W,LAMBRETTE U.The cloud value chain exposed[R].San Jose:Cisco,2012. [12]GLEESON N,WALDEN I.It's a jungle out there?Cloud computing,standards and the law[J].European Journal of Law and Technology,2014,5(2):1-22 [13]于连超.私有标准及其反垄断法规制[J].北方法学,2012,6(3):142-150. [14]NEWMAN J M.Antitrust in digital markets[J].Vanderbilt Law Review,2019,72(5):1497-1561. [15]焦海涛.平台互联互通义务及其实现[J].探索与争鸣,2022(3):118-128,179. [16]时建中,吴宗泽.作为反垄断救济措施的数字平台互操作义务[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,42(1):108-125. [17]SONG S.Competition law and interoperability in cloud computing[J].Computer Law & Security Review,2017,33(5):1-13. [18]GANS J,HERVÉ M,MASRI M.Economic analysis of proposed regulations of cloud services in Europe[J].European Competition Journal,2023,19(3):522-568. [19]林梓瀚,刘羿鸣,袁千里.自贸区数据跨境流动监管沙盒机制:理论证成与制度建构[J].中国科技论坛,2025(5):30-39,71. [20]雷刚,孙国敏.从价值定位到制度建构:数字时代算法审计制度的路径探析[J].甘肃理论学刊,2025(3):75-84. [21]殷继国.互联网平台封禁行为的反垄断法规制[J].现代法学,2021,43(4):143-155. [22]李希梁.反垄断监管与事前监管:互联网平台监管模式的二元建构[J].交大法学,2023(2):89-103. [23]焦海涛,梅珂悦.“内卷式”竞争的反垄断法定位及其规制[J].财经问题研究,2025(8):31-44.
2026, 
