Abstract：On the basis of the theory of product space,this paper compares the industrial upgrading path in BRICS from 2000 to 2015.First of all, empirical studies using the comparative advantages and the density indicators show that the industrial upgrading in BRICS has deviated from the path of comparative advantage,especially in China.Secondly, on the basis of comparison on the economic complexities,growth performance,capability distance and other indicators,it concludes that China and India have strong capabilities to evolve their product space;Brazil and South Africa's capabilities to evolve their product space are similar, while Russia's is nearly stagnant.On the whole, China and India are stronger in competitiveness in industrial upgrading.China's product diversity and economic growth stability have obvious advantages.The leap-forward development path that deviates from its comparative advantages is beneficial to China.
张美云, 宋宇. 金砖五国产品空间演化与产业升级路径比较[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(3): 180-188.
Zhang Meiyun, Song Yu. The Comparison Study of the Spatial Evolution and Industrial Upgrading Path in BRICS. , 2018(3): 180-188.
[1]王元颖.新常态下中国与金砖国家经贸合作研究[J].复旦国际关系评论,2016(01):56. [2]张妍妍.产品空间结构演化与产业升级研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014:19-22. [3]ROMER P M.Endogenous technical change[J].Journal of political economy,1990,98(5):71-102. [4]GROSSMAN G M,HELPMAN E.Quality ladders in the theory of growth[J].Review of economic studies,1991,58(1):43-61. [5]AGHION P,HOWITT P.A Model of growth through creative destruction[J].Econometrica,1992,60(2):323-351. [6]YOUNG A.Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade[J].Quarterly journal of economics,1989,106(2):369-405. [7]MATSUYAMA K.Self-Defeating regional concentration[J].Review of economic studies,1998,65(2):211-34. [8]JOVANOVIC B,NYARKO Y.Learning by doing and the choice of technology[J].Econometrica,1996,64(6):1299-1310. [9]HAUSMANN R,KLINGER B.Structural transformation and patterns of comparative advantage in the product space[J].Ssrn electronic journal,2006:1-35. [10]伍业君,张其仔,徐娟.产品空间与比较优势演化述评[J].经济评论,2012(4):145-152. [11]刘林青,谭畅.产业国际竞争力的结构观:一个正在涌现的研究域[J].经济评论,2014(3):153-160. [12]林毅夫,蔡昉,李周.比较优势与发展战略:对“东亚奇迹”的再解释[J].中国社会科学,1999(5):4-20. [13]张其仔.比较优势的演化与中国产业升级路径的选择[J].中国工业经济,2008(9):58-68. [14]张其仔,李颢.产业政策是应遵循还是违背比较优势[J].经济管理,2013(10):27-37. [15]邓向荣,曹红.产业升级路径选择:遵循抑或偏离比较优势:基于产品空间结构的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2016(2):52-66. [16]祝树金,李仁宇,江鸣.结构转换能力与专业化模式变迁:基于金砖四国出口数据的比较分析[J].当代财经,2015(6):85-96. [17]BALASSA B.Revealed′ comparative advantage revisited:an analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries,1953—1971[J].The Manchester school,1977,45(4):327-344. [18]刘重力,刘德江.中国对外贸易比较优势变化实证分析[J].南开经济研究,2003(2):48-51. [19]HAUSMANN R,KLINGER B.The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage[R].CID Working Paper,2007,NO.146. [20]HIDALGO C A,HAUSMANN R.The building blocks of economic complexity[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America,2009,106(26):10570-10575. [21]吴金新.民粹主义、出口多样性与中等收入陷阱——跨国实证研究[D].杭州:浙江工商大学,2014:12-16. [22]IMBS J M,WACZIARG R T.Stages of diversification[J].Research papers,2000,93(1):63-86. [23]MICHAELY M.Trade,income levels,and dependence[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Ltd,1984:1-208. [24]李慧,平芳芳.装备制造业产业结构升级程度测量[J].中国科技论坛,2017(2):80-86. [25]张亭,刘林青.中美产业升级的路径选择比较:基于产品空间理论的分析[J].经济管理,2016(8):18-28.
2018, 
