The Coordination Analysis of Coupling Relationship Between Scientific Research and Education System in University——Case Study of Top 100 Universities in USA
He Shunhui1,2, Du Debin1,2, Lin Yu1, Liu Shufeng1
1.School of Urban and Regional Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China; 2.Institute for Innovation Strategic Studies,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China
Abstract：On the basis of the evaluation index system of scientific research and education capacity in university,this paper creates a coupling model to reveal the temporal law of the interactive coupling relationship between scientific research and educational system of top 100 universities in USA.The result shows:①As a whole,the coupling relationship between scientific research and educational system was at the high stage and the coordinated degree was steady in the study period.From the perspective of time evolution,the coupling degree of scientific research and educational system showed a dynamically U-type trend,while the coordination degree showed an upward trend in S-type respectively.On this basis,the coordination development process of scientific research and educational system in universities can be divided into two stages:homogeneous changes stage(2005—2008)and heterogeneity changes stage(2009—2011).②The Gini coefficient of scientific research was higher than education's and showed a dynamically upward trend while the education's presented an opposite tendency,the gap between them enlarging.③The intercollegiate distinction of coupling intensity was not obvious,while the coordination degree presented a“spindle”hierarchical rating scale structure.According to the coupling intensity and coordination degree,the scientific research and educational system in universities could be divided into six types.
何舜辉, 杜德斌, 林宇, 刘树峰. 耦合视角下的高校科研与教育系统关系——以美国百强高校为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(3): 172-179.
He Shunhui, Du Debin, Lin Yu, Liu Shufeng. The Coordination Analysis of Coupling Relationship Between Scientific Research and Education System in University——Case Study of Top 100 Universities in USA. , 2018(3): 172-179.
[1]杜德斌,何舜辉.全球科技创新中心的内涵、功能与组织结构[J].中国科技论坛,2016(2):10-15. [2]HUMBOLDT W.On the spirit and the organizational framework of intellectual institutions in Berlin[J].Minerva,1970,8:242-250. [3]SHIN J C,ARIMOTO A,CUMMINGS W K,et al.Teaching and research in contemporary higher education[M].Springer Netherlands,2014. [4]FELDMAN K A.Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness:A review and exploration[J].Research in higher education,1987,26(3):227-298. [5]韩淑伟,仇鸿伟,等.教师科研水平与本科教学效果关系的实证分析:关于某校本科教学效果与科研水平相关性案例研究[J].高教探索,2007(6):188-193. [6]李宝斌,许晓东.高校教师评价中教学科研失衡的实证与反思[J].高等工程教育研究,2011(2):76-81. [7]乔联宝.基于联合DEA模型的“985”高校科研-教学综合效率评价[J].科研管理,2015(S1):210-215. [8]COATE K,BARNETT R,WILLIAMS G.Relationships between teaching and research in higher education in England[J].Higher education quarterly,2001,55(2):158-174. [9]WITTE K D,ROGGE N,CHERCHYE L,et al.Economies of scope in research and teaching:a non-parametric investigation[J].Omega,2012,41(2):305-314. [10]周光礼,马海泉.科教融合:高等教育理念的变革与创新[J].中国高教研究,2012(8):15-23. [11]钟秉林.推进大学科教融合努力培养创新型人才[J].成才之路,2015(21):4-6. [12]刘承良,段德忠,余瑞林,等.武汉城市圈社会经济与资源环境系统耦合作用的时空结构[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(5):145-152. [13]范斐,杜德斌,盛垒.长三角科技资源配置能力与城市化进程的协调耦合关系研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2013,28(7):69-75. [14]杨武,杨淼.中国科技创新与经济发展耦合协调度模型[J].中国科技论坛,2016(3):30-35.
2018, 
