Abstract：As an advanced productive service industry,science and technology service industry,provides intellectual services to the enterprises by using modern scientific knowledge,technology and information.Science and technology service industry can reduce manufacturing cost with specialized division of labor,form the core competitiveness of enterprises through technology innovation and improve resource allocation by increasing organic composition of capital,which effectively promote manufacturing efficiency.However,this promotion is not straightforward as it may be achieve through such factors as science and technology innovation capability,the concentration of science and technology service industry,and the level of human capital.In order to clarify the paths to promote manufacturing efficiency through science and technology service industry,this paper builds an intermediary effect model based on the panel data of 11 provinces(cities)in eastern China that enables an empirical study on the conditions for science and technology service industry to promote manufacturing efficiency.The results show that science and technology innovation capability has a complete intermediary effect.The concentration of science and technology services industry has a strong intermediary effect while the level of human capital has a weak intermediary effect.Therefore,establishing alliance of industry-university-research institute-+intermediary agencies,enchancing science and technology innovation capability of enterprises through resources integration,guiding science and technology service industry to generate spatial agglomeration according to urban agglomeration,creating one-stop science and technology services zone,cultivating self-innovation talents and improving the human capital level of enterprises are beneficial for science and technology service industry to promote manufacturing efficiency.
杨慧力, 汪金月, 李静. 科技服务业促进制造业效率提升的路径[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(11): 71-76.
Yang Huili, Wang Jinyue, Li Jing. The Paths to Promote Manufacturing Efficiency Through Science and Technology Service Industry. , 2018(11): 71-76.
[1]王晶,谭清美,黄西川.科技服务业系统功能分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(6):3-4. [2]刘叶,刘伯凡.生产性服务业与制造业协同集聚对制造业效率的影响——基于中国城市群面板数据的实证研究[J].经济管理,2016(6):16-28. [3]肖国安,张志彬.生产性服务业发展对我国工业转型升级的影响:基于城市面板数据的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛,2012(9):123-128. [4]路红艳.生产性服务与制造业结构升级——基于产业互动、融合的视角[J].财贸经济,2009(9):126-131. [5]张琴,赵丙奇,郑旭.科技服务业集聚与制造业升级:机理与实证检验[J].管理世界,2015(11):178-179. [6]代谦,别朝霞.人力资本、动态比较优势与发展中国家产业结构升级[J].世界经济,2006(11):70-84+96. [7]BARON R M,KENNY D A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,1986,51:1173-1182. [8]冯泰文.生产性服务业的发展对制造业效率的影响——以交易成本和制造成本为中介变量[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(3):56-65. [9]林毅夫.后发优势与后发劣势——与杨小凯教授商榷[J].经济学(季刊),2003,2(4):989-1004.
2018, 
