|
|
How Government Digital Platforms Enhance the Effectiveness of Intellectual Property Governance: A Case Study Based on Zhejiang Intellectual Property Online |
Duan Yongbiao, Dong Xinyu |
School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China |
|
|
Abstract The construction of intellectual property(IP)digital platforms provides a powerful support to promote the modernization of intellectual property governance(IPG).However,existing studies have paid insufficient attention to the effectiveness of IPG and the role played by government digital platforms in IPG.Based on the“technology-organization-scene”(TOS)model,this study takes“Zhejiang Intellectual Property Online”as a case study to explore the internal mechanism and key path of the government digital platform to enhance the effectiveness of IPG.The study finds that the government digital platform builds a dynamic closed-loop model of IPG with the linkage matching and dynamic evolution among technology,organization and scenario,accelerates the IP digital platform services towards agile,holistic and responsive governance,promotes the speedy review of IP,the efficient application,the facilitation of IP protection,the scientific management and the personalization of IP services,and promotes effectiveness of IPG in cooperation.In terms of realization path,platform construction based on digital technology and data sharing,collaborative governance based on technology embedding and relationship reconfiguration,and scenario innovation based on user demand and dynamic evolution jointly support the digital transformation of IP,and accelerate the promotion of IP in terms of digital creation paradigm,digital service supply,digital application capacity,digital protection mechanism and digital governance system.
|
Received: 20 February 2025
|
|
|
|
|
[1]谷丽,杨馨慈,贺敬辉.知识产权治理行为形成机理研究:基于计划行为理论的解释框架[J].科研管理.2024,45(3):143-150. [2]张晶,陈志龙.城市知识产权治理与企业创新[J].统计研究.2023,40(8):110-121. [3]孟子龙,任丙强.地方政府数字治理何以有效提升基层治理效能:基于S市A区“一网统管”的案例研究[J].中国行政管理.2023(6):15-22. [4]王锐,倪星.数字平台驱动下的群众监督与政府回应:以A省民生领域监督信息平台为例[J].治理研究.2023,39(2):124-138. [5]许为宾,唐青舟,李欢.知识产权保护与企业数字化转型:基于知识产权示范城市的准自然实验[J].科研管理.2023,44(10):53-61. [6]谷丽,梁茜,贺敬辉.知识产权治理主体的相互作用机制研究:基于全过程视角[J].科学学研究.2023,41(10):1854-1863. [7]喻玲,邵滨.开源社区知识产权治理模式及变革:基于36个开源社区使用协议的考察[J].科学学研究.2024,42(9):1938-1945. [8]孙晓华,唐卓伟,马雪娇,等.知识产权制度渐进式改革之路:“有为政府”与“有效市场”的协同演进[J].经济研究.2024,59(9):136-153. [9]董涛.知识产权数据治理研究[J].管理世界.2022,38(4):109-125. [10]刘秉镰,范馨.知识产权示范城市建设政策是否改善了企业要素资源错配[J].经济与管理研究.2024,45(9):126-144. [11]李胜会,戎芳毅.知识产权治理如何提升产业链韧性:基于国家知识产权示范城市政策的实证检验[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版).2022,44(5):92-107. [12]陈永昌,孙鹏博,王宏鸣.知识产权保护政策能否推动企业开放式创新:以国家知识产权示范城市政策为准实验的经验研究[J].经济与管理研究.2023,44(4):90-107. [13]宋世明,张鹏,葛赋斌.中国知识产权体制演进与改革方向研究[J].中国行政管理.2016(9):34-40. [14]易继明.新时代中国特色知识产权发展之路[J].政法论丛.2022(1):3-18. [15]何华.知识产权全球治理体系的功能危机与变革创新:基于知识产权国际规则体系的考察[J].政法论坛.2020,38(3):66-79. [16]李向阳,刘扬,闫志全,等.基于区块链的知识产权交易平台研究与实现[J].计算机工程与应用.2023,59(3):308-316. [17]冯晓青.数字环境下知识产权制度面临的挑战、问题及对策研究[J].社会科学战线.2023(9):198-212. [18]胡锴,熊焰,梁玲玲,等.数据知识产权交易市场的理论源起、概念内涵与设计借鉴[J].电子政务.2023(7):27-42. [19]甄红线,王玺,方红星.知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J].经济研究.2023,58(11):62-79. [20]戚聿东,杜博,叶胜然.知识产权与技术标准协同驱动数字产业创新:机理与路径[J].中国工业经济.2022(8):5-24. [21]马蕾,梁凯桐,王阳,等.数字技术驱动下中国知识产权运营平台发展历程及演化趋势[J].中国科技论坛.2021(10):153-161. [22]冉从敬,马丽娜.高校知识产权信息服务平台价值共创:过程、机制与路径[J].图书馆论坛.2023,43(1):103-111. [23]韦景竹,操慧子.供需视角下粤港澳大湾区知识产权公共信息服务平台优化研究[J].图书馆建设.2022(1):166-177. [24]李慧慧,邢羿飞.组合演化:政务服务数字化转型中的“技术-组织”互动机制:基于深圳“民意速办”改革的分析[J].电子政务.2025(3):89-102. [25]高恩新,刘璐.平台的“祛魅”:城市治理数字化转型中的组织-技术互嵌逻辑[J].东南学术.2023(2):125-134. [26]方鑫,李香,魏姝.场景驱动的政府数字化转型:数字技术何以回应复杂治理需求:以江苏南通市为例[J].电子政务.2024(6):14-27. [27]张静.案例分析的目标:从故事到知识[J].中国社会科学.2018(8):126-142. |
|
|
|