|
|
|
| Artificial Intelligence Legislation from the Perspective of Globalization:Dynamics,Dilemmas and Directions |
| Wang Xigen, Cheng Rui |
| School of Law,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Artificial intelligence is an important driving force for the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation.While it promotes economic and social development,it also brings certain risks,causing new ethical dilemmas and legal issues,and giving rise to legislative needs.Due to the ambiguity of legislative concepts,the specificity of adjustment objects,the breadth of adjustment scope,and the shortage of legislative technology,artificial intelligence legislation faces challenges and needs to be based on a global perspective,construct a basic framework,and ensure the achievement of legislative goals that balance safety and development.Summarizing the experience of artificial intelligence legislation at home and abroad,it is found that China's artificial intelligence legislation should follow this approach.Firstly,in terms of value positioning,it should transform from control oriented legislation to promotion oriented legislation,aiming to promote artificial intelligence innovation through legal innovation;Secondly,in terms of legislative content,we need to shift from an obligation based approach to a rights based approach,in order to better promote the development of new quality productivity driven by artificial intelligence;Thirdly,in terms of legislative mode,we aim to shift from decentralized legislation to unified legislation,with the goal of creating a favorable environment for the development of artificial intelligence with good laws and governance;Fourthly,in terms of protection mode,we aim to shift from separate protection of public and private law to integrated protection of public and private law,in order to provide comprehensive protection for the development of artificial intelligence.Fifthly,in terms of legal responsibility,the transformation from traditional responsibility to new responsibility aims to provide legal guarantees for the realization of rights and the fulfillment of obligations.The Artificial Intelligence Law is both an industry promotion law and a human rights protection law,aiming to provide a new paradigm for economic development and human rights protection in the digital age.
|
|
Received: 30 June 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]程睿.治理观视域下网络不良信息内容的法律认定标准[J].江西社会科学,2022(6):159-167.
[2]龙卫球.科技法迭代视角下的人工智能立法[J].法商研究,2020(1):57-72.
[3]马长山.人工智能的社会风险及其法律规制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018(6):47-55.
[4]程睿,秦小红.生成式人工智能使用者的透明度义务:以ChatGPT介入学术论文创作为视角[J].学术研究,2024(3):14-18.
[5]李猛.人类命运共同体视角下人工智能风险全球治理的国际法规制路径探究[J].宁夏社会科学,2024(2):112-124.
[6]姜伟,龙卫球.数字法学原理[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2023.
[7]Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023[EB/OL].(2023-04-03)[2024-05-24].https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf.
[8]贾夏利,刘小平.中美人工智能竞争现状对比分析及启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2022(4):531-542.
[9]陈亮.人工智能立法体系化的困境与出路[J].数字法治,2023(6):10-17.
[10]程睿.双轨并行模式中在线诉讼的同意规则[J].现代法学,2023(5):90-111.
[11]汪习根,桂晓伟.论法治理念[J].天津行政学院学报,2008(3):69-72.
[12]CRAWFORD K,CALO R.There is a blind spot in AI research[J].Nature,2016,538(7625):311-313.
[13]程睿.ChatGPT介入学术论文透明度义务的可视正义功能[J].科学学研究,2023(12):2138-2146.
[14]侯东德.人工智能法的基本问题及制度架构[J].政法论丛,2023(6):61-72.
[15]张守文.人工智能产业发展的经济法规制[J].政治与法律,2019(1):2-10.
[16]张文显.法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.
[17]联合国教育、科学及文化组织.人工智能伦理问题建议书[EB/OL].(2021-11-25)[2024-04-10].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455_chi.
[18]程睿.ChatGPT介入学术论文创作透明度义务的履行[J].中国高教研究,2023(11):62-69.
[19]郭春镇.生成式AI的融贯性法律治理:以生成式预训练模型(GPT)为例[J].现代法学,2023(3):88-107.
[20]郑志峰.人工智能立法的一般范畴[J].数字法治,2023(6):55-75.
[21]汪习根,段昀.数字发展权保障的中国经验与世界意义[J].学习与实践,2023(7):21-29.
[22]凌斌.权利本位论的哲学奠基[J].现代法学,2015(5):3-11.
[23]陈吉栋.公私交融的人工智能法[J].东方法学,2024(2):63-75.
[24]王德夫.论人工智能算法的知识产权保护[J].知识产权,2021(11):50-70.
[25]郑志峰.人工智能产品责任的立法更新[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2024(4):3-17. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 6 
