中外杰出科学家行政任职状况比较研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (5610 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Outstanding scientists are the leading force in the country's scientific and technological development.Analyzing the basic proportion of their working hours can create conditions for their scientific research and innovation in terms of system and mechanism.This paper takes the academicians of the physics department of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Nobel Prize winners in physics as research objects,and makes a comprehensive comparison and analysis of the differences in the administrative,social and academic aspects.The results show that the academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences not only have a wide variety of positions,a large number of positions and a long tenure,but also at different stages before and after election,different types of positions and the number of positions per capita are significantly higher than the Nobel Prize winners.The quantitative analysis results show that there is room for further improvement in the professional expectations of outstanding scientists in Chinese society and outstanding scientists' allocation of working hours and the undertaken of various positions.

Key words： Academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences Nobel Prize winner Administrative Position Policy proposal

Received: 12 March 2020

PACS:

G322.0

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Gaofeng
	Kong Qingqing
	Xu Fei

Cite this article:

Wang Gaofeng,Kong Qingqing,Xu Fei. A Comparative Study on Administrative Positions of Outstanding Scientists at Home and Abroad[J]. , 2020, 1(11): 129-136.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I11/129

[1] 汪士.中外杰出科学家行政任职差异及其影响[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(6):134-138.
[2] BARBER B.Family status,local-community status,and social stratification:three types of social ranking[J].Pacific sociological review,1961(4):3-10.
[3] COLE S.Age and scientific performance[J].American journal of sociology,1979(8):958-977.
[4] LEDERBERG J,ZUCKERMAN H,MERTON R K.Transcript of oral history with Joshua Lederberg,Harriet Zuckerman,and Robert K.Merton[J].National library of medicine,1976(6):23-26.
[5] 徐飞,汪士.杰出科学家行政任职对科研创新的影响——以诺奖获得者与中国科学院院士比较为例[J].科学学研究,2010,28(7):981-985.
[6] 徐飞.宁静致远水滴石穿——从杰出科学家的管理说开去[J].科学与社会,2017,37(4):43-47.
[7] 徐飞,王剑峰.中国科学家对国家的贡献——以物理学家为例[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(10):101-106.
[8] 徐祥运.中外杰出科学家行政任职差异的定性和定量比较[J].自然辩证法研究,2014,30(5):66-72.
[9] 徐祥运,蔡振东,林琳.杰出科学家行政任职的概念界定、类型划分与状况概述[J].大连大学学报,2016,37(4):139-143.
[10] 孙玲,尚智丛.浅析我国当代科技人员的社会分层结构[J].科学管理研究,2012,32(14):174-179.
[11] 刘俊婉,郑晓敏,王菲菲,等.科学精英科研生产力和影响力的社会年龄分析——以中国科学院院士为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(11):30-35.
[12] 章娟.中科院院士与诺贝尔生理学或医学奖获得者奖前SCI论文比较[J].医学与哲学,2016,37(1):22-26.
[13] 默顿.科学社会学:理论与经验研究[M].鲁旭东,林聚任,译.北京:商务印书出版社,2003.
[14] 喻建.科研管理去行政化对策研究[J].江苏科技信息,2016,23(35):22-24.
[15] 唐品华.《科学引文索引》及其在科研评价中的作用[J].图书与情报,2005(1):68-70.
[16] 杨建邺.20世纪诺贝尔奖获得者辞典[M].武汉:武汉出版社,2001.
[17] 袁军.国际视角下我国国立科研院所治理模式“去行政化”改革研究[J].科技促进发展,2018,14(5):338-344.
[18] 郑永彪,高洁玉.世界主要发达国家吸引海外人才的政策及启示[J].科学学研究,2013,31(2):223-231.
[19] 马斯洛.马斯洛谈自我超越[M].石磊,译.天津:天津社会科学出版社,2011.
[20] 王金平,袁明旭.打破人才工作中的“马太效应”让人人都有出彩的机会[J].产业与科技论坛,2016,15(4):242-243.
[21] 赵瑜.给科研工作者更多搞科研的时间[J].中国政协,2018,20(11):29-30.
[22] 兰金林.人才管理中的人才官本位问题及破解思路[J].黄冈技术学院学报,2017,19(4):80-82.
[23] 库尔特·勒温.拓扑心理学原理[M].竺培良,译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,1997.
[24] 王荣德.诺贝尔科学奖中的“人才链”及其启示[J].科学学研究,2000,18(2):70-76.