科研团队授权型领导对交互记忆系统的影响研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (6981 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Abstract:Given the complexity of scientific inquiry,the innovation process of science teams requires the integration of divergent knowledge and perspectives from different team members.Existing research has explored the mechanisms of Transactive Memory System(TMS)from team cognitions and team process perspectives.However,the impact of team information processing has been underestimated.This research collected 452 data from 73 research teams to investigate how empowering leadership of science teams affect team TMS in China via team reflectivity as a key mechanism and team proactive personality as a key boundary condition.The results show that team reflectivity partial mediated the relationship between empowering leadership and TMS and team proactive personality positively moderated the relationship between team reflectivity and TMS and thus indirectly moderated the relationship between empowering leadership and TMS.Our findings extend and enrich current research and provide important implications for managing science teams.

Key words： Empowering leadership Transactive Memory System(TMS) Team reflectivity Team information processing

Received: 17 February 2020

PACS:

G311

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xie Zhitao
	Wang Chenxuan

Cite this article:

Xie Zhitao,Wang Chenxuan. The Effect of Empowering Leadership on Transactive Memory System in Scientific Teams[J]. , 2020, 1(11): 137-146.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I11/137

[1] 李明.试论高校科研团队的管理与建设[J].中国高教研究,2007(7):66-68.
[2] WEGNER D M.Transactive memory:a contemporary analysis of the group mind//MULLEN B,GOETHALS G R.Theory of group behavior.New York,NY:Springer,1987:185-208.
[3] 吕逸婧,陈守明,邵婉玲.高管团队交互记忆系统与组织绩效:战略柔性的中介作用[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(1):216-224.
[4] 张钢,熊立.成员异质性与团队绩效:以交互记忆系统为中介变量[J].科研管理,2009,30(1):71-80.
[5] HOLLINGSHEAD A B.Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,2001,81(6):1080-1089.
[6] REN Y,ARGOTE L.Transactive memory systems 1985—2010:anintegrative framework of key dimensions,antecedents,and consequences[J].The academy of management annals,2011,5(1):189-229.
[7] 张钢,熊立.交互记忆系统研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007(5):840-845.
[8] DREU D,CARSTEN K W.Cooperative outcome interdependence,task reflexivity,and team effectiveness:a motivated information processing perspective[J].Journal of applied psychology,2007,92(3):628-638.
[9] BETTS K R,HINSZ V B.Collaborative group memory:processes,performance,and techniques for improvement[J].Social and personality psychology compass,2010,4(2):119-130.
[10] FREY L R,GOURAN D S,POOLE M S.The handbook of group communication theory and research[M].London:Sage Publications.1999.
[11] GIBSON C B.From knowledge accumulation to accommodation:cycles of collective cognition in work groups[J].Journal of organizational behavior,2001,22(2):121-134.
[12] SCHIPPERS M C,EDMONSON A C,WEST M A.Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures[J].Small group research,2014,45(6):731-769.
[13] LORINKOVA N M,PEARSALL M J,SIMS H P.Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams[J].Academy of management journal,2013,56(2):573-596.
[14] SRIVASTAVA A,BARTOL K M,LOCKE E A.Empowering leadership in management teams:effects on knowledge sharing,efficacy,and performance[J].Academy of management journal,2006,49(6):1239-1251.
[15] CHIU C Y C,OWENS B P,TESLUK P E.Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams:the role of leader humility,team proactive personality,and team performance capability[J].Journal of applied psychology,2016,101(12):1705.
[16] 李晓燕.授权型领导的概念、影响效果及测量方法研究综述[J].重庆电子工程职业学院学报,2019,28(1):12-16.
[17] VECCHIO R P,JUSTIN J E,PEARCE C L.The utility of transactional and transformational leadership for predicting performance and satisfaction within a path-goal theory framework[J].Journal of occupational and organizational psychology,2008,81(1):71-82.
[18] RAUB S,ROBERT C.Empowerment,organizational commitment,and voice behavior in the hospitality industry:evidence from a multinational sample[J].Cornell hospitality quarterly,2013,54(2):136-148.
[19] 薛会娟.授权型领导如何促进团队创造力?——以交互记忆系统为中介[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(24):144-147.
[20] 林晓敏,林琳,王永丽,等.授权型领导与团队绩效:交互记忆系统的中介作用[J].管理评论,2014,26(1):78-87.
[21] 张谦,刘人境,宋艳双.团队反思对团队绩效影响机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(21):137-142.
[22] 林筠,王蒙.交互记忆系统对团队探索式学习和利用式学习的影响:以团队反思为中介[J].管理评论,2014,26(6):143-150.
[23] FULLER B,MARLER L E.Change driven by nature:a meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature[J].Journal of vocational behavior,2009,75(3):329-345.
[24] 周飞,陈钦兰,何美贤.包容型领导与员工创新行为的关系研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(6):22-29.
[25] AMABILE T M,SCHATZEL E A,MONETA G B.Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity:perceived leader support[J].The leadership quarterly,2004,15(1):5-32.
[26] 王端旭,武朝艳.变革型领导与团队交互记忆系统:团队信任和团队反思的中介作用[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,41(3):170-179.
[27] ASHLEIGH M,PRICHARD J.An integrative model of the role of trust in transactive memory development[J].Group & organization management,2012,37(1):5-35.
[28] 赵文平,聂聚宾.家长式领导对跨学科团队创新绩效的影响——以交互记忆系统为中介变量[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(12):125-130.
[29] 刘雪梅,刘铮.共享型领导对团队创造力的影响机制研究[J].软科学,2019,33(4):114-118+140.
[30] KANAWATTANACHAI,YOO.The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time[J].MIS quarterly,2007,31(4):783-808.
[31] 徐兵,石冠峰.变革型领导对团队创造力的影响机制研究:团队反思与团队边界管理的中介作用[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(18):19-25.
[32] 佟星,任浩.领导行为与团队双元创新能力构建关系研究——双元视角下团队反思的有中介的调节效应检验[J].科技进步与对策,2019(19):137-144.
[33] KIRKMAN B L,ROSEN B.Beyond self-management:antecedents and consequences of team empowerment[J].Academy of management journal,1999,42(1):58-74.
[34] 陈国权,赵慧群,蒋璐.团队心理安全、团队学习能力与团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(6):1283-1292.
[35] CARMELI A,SCHAUBROECK J,TISHLER A.How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes:implications for firm performance[J].The leadership quarterly,2011,22(2):399-411.
[36] HIRST G,MANN L.A model of R&D leadership and team communication:the relationship with project performance[J].R&D management,2004,34(2):147-160.
[37] BATEMAN T S,CRANT J M.The proactive component of organizational behavior:a measure and correlates[J].Journal of organizational behavior,1993,14(2):103-118.
[38] SEIBERT S E,CRANT J M,KRAIMER M L.Proactive personality and career success.[J].Journal of applied psychology,1999,84(3):416-427.
[39] 曾海洋.服务型领导对员工工作投入的影响——主动性人格的调节作用[J].关东学刊,2017(8):145-154.
[40] 毛凯贤,李超平.互动视角下道德领导与主动性人格影响新员工敬业度的作用机制[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(12):156-170.
[41] Lonner W J,Berry J W.Field methods in cross-cultural research[M].London:Sage Publications,1986.
[42] CHUANG C H,JACKSON S E,JIANG Y.Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems,leadership,and tacit knowledge[J].Journal of management,2016,42(2):524-554.
[43] LEWIS K.Measuring transactive memory systems in the field:scale development and validation[J].Journal of applied psychology,2003,88(4):587-604.
[44] JACKSON S E,BRETT J F,SESSA V I.Some differences make a difference:individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment,promotions,and turnover[J].Journal of applied psychology,1991,76(5):675-689.
[45] MACKINNON D P,LOCKWOOD C M,WILLIAMS J.Confidence limits for the indirect effect:distribution of the product and resampling methods[J].Multivariate behavioral research,2004,39(1):99-128.
[46] ZHAO X,LYNCH J G,CHEN Q.Reconsidering Baron and Kenny:myths and truths about mediation analysis[J].Journal of consumer research,2010,37(2):197-206.
[47] EDWARDS J R,LAMBERT L S.Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J].Psychological methods,2007,12(1):1-22.