行动者互动视域下算法影子官僚异化风险

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (9482 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The algorithm shadow bureaucrats with algorithm companies as the main body participate in the construction of digital government,on the one hand,greatly improve the ability of digital government services.on the other hand,they use the advantages of algorithms to bring the government into the black box,posing a threat to the construction of digital government.On the basis of existing research,from the perspective of actor-centered interaction,this study constructs the specific dialogue between theory and reality in the macro-institutional environment and micro-interaction logic,respectively,to explore the interaction patterns and incentives between algorithm shadow bureaucrats and multiple actors of government departments,so as to effectively respond to the simplification and generalization tendency of existing studies on the structure and inducement demonstration of interaction among actors.It is found that the alienation risk of interaction imbalance is embodied in the algorithm black box risk which depends on the inherent principal-agent cooperation relationship and the hidden collusion risk hidden under the administrative deviation caused by the hierarchical coordination mechanism.In essence,this is caused by the governance distance caused by the double dimensions of algorithm black box and system vacuum,which should be resolved from the aspects of laws and regulations,value norms,talent training,supervision and governance,etc.

Key words： Algorithm shadow bureaucrat Actor Interaction Collaboration Alienation risk

Received: 17 November 2023

PACS:	D601
	D63

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Han Yunchao

Cite this article:

Han Yunchao. The Risk of Algorithm Shadow Bureaucratic Alienation from the Perspective of Actors' Interaction[J]. , 2024, 5(9): 144-155.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I9/144

[1]国家互联网信息办公室.关于印发《关于加强互联网信息服务算法综合治理的指导意见》的通知[EB/ OL].(2021-09-29)[2023-08-19].http://www.cac.gov.cn/2021-09/29/c_1634507915623047.htm.
[2]BALKIN J M.Free speech in the algorithmic society:big data,private governance,and new school speech regulation[J].University of California Davis law review,2018,51(3):1149.
[3]孙伟平.人工智能与人的“新异化”[J].中国社会科学,2020(12):119-137,202-203.
[4]阿里尔·扎拉奇,莫里斯·E.斯图克.算法的陷阱:超级平台、算法垄断与场景欺骗[M].余潇,译.北京:中信出版社,2018.
[5]张凌寒.算法权力的兴起、异化及法律规制[J].法商研究,2019,36(4):63-75.
[6]乔治·弗雷德里克森.公共行政的精神[M].张成福,刘霞,张璋,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[7]LAKE R W,NEWMAN K.Differential citizenship in the shadow state[J].GeoJournal,2002,58(2/3):109-120.
[8]郑崇明.警惕公共治理中算法影子官僚的风险[J].探索与争鸣,2021,10(1):103-109,179.
[9]徐景一.算法主导下的平台企业劳动关系与治理路径[J].社会科学辑刊,2021(5):164-171.
[10]SCHARPF F W.Games real actors play:actor-centered institutionalism in policy research[M].Boulder:Westview Press,1997.
[11]郑永彪,张磊,张生太,等.委托代理问题研究综述[J].中国流通经济,2013,27(5):63-69.
[12]盖伊·彼得斯.政治科学中的制度理论:新制度主义(第3版)[M].王向民,段红伟,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2016.
[13]马长山.数字法治的体系性建构:基于2021年以来我国数字法治建设的观察分析[J].浙江警察学院学报,2023(1):1-10.
[14]黑格尔.法哲学原理[M].范扬,张企泰,译.北京:商务印书馆,1961.
[15]李月军.以行动者为中心的制度主义:基于转型政治体系的思考[J].公共管理学报,2007(3):28-35,122.
[16]杰弗里·菲佛,杰勒尔德·R.萨兰基克.组织的外部控制:对组织资源依赖的分析[M].闫蕊,译.北京:东方出版社,2006.
[17]王翔,余霄.体制压力对地方政府数字人才诉求的结构化影响:基于政府数字化转型的背景[J].电子政务,2023(8):10-21.
[18]LIU T,YANG X,ZHENG Y.Understanding the evolution of public-private partnerships in Chinese e-government:four stages of development[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration,2020,42(4):222-247.
[19]罗伯特·阿格拉诺夫,迈克尔·麦圭尔.协作性公共管理:地方政府新战略[M].李玲玲,鄞益奋,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[20]HELLOWELL M,PRICE D,POLLOCK A M.The use of private finance initiative(PFI)public private partnerships(PPPs)in Northern Ireland[J].University of Edinburgh,Northern Ireland Public Service Alliance,2008.
[21]COASE R H.The problem of social cost[J].The journal of Law and Economics,2013,56(4):837-877.
[22]敬乂嘉.合作治理:再造公共服务的逻辑[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2019.
[23]RUUSKA I,TEIGLAND R.Ensuring project success through collective competence and creative conflict in public-private partnerships:a case study of Bygga Villa,a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative[J].International Journal of Project Management,2009,27(4):323-334.
[24]W.理查德·斯科特.组织理论:理性、自然与开放系统的视角[M].高俊山,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[25]SHAPIRO S P.Agency theory[J].Annual Review of Sociology,2005,31:263-284.
[26]ANEESH A.Technologically coded authority:the post-industrial decline in bureaucratic hierarchies[C].7th International Summer Academy on Technology Studies,Deutschlandsberg,Austria,2002:27-31.
[27]MERTON R K.Reader in Bureaucracy[M].Glencoe,Ill:Free Press,1952.
[28]SCHARPF F W.Games real actors play:actor-centered institutionalism in policy research[M].Boulder:Westview Press,1997.
[29]周雪光.中国国家治理的制度逻辑:一个组织学研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2017.
[30]杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1996.
[31]赖先进.论政府跨部门协同治理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[32]PIERSON P.Increasing returns,path dependence,and the study of politics[J].American Political Science Review,2000,94(2):251-267.
[33]赵玉林,任莹,周悦.指尖上的形式主义:压力型体制下的基层数字治理[J].电子政务,2020(3):100-109.
[34]诺伯特·维纳.控制论:关于动物和机器的控制与传播科学[M].陈娟,译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2018.
[35]张恩典.人工智能算法决策对行政法治的挑战及制度因应[J].行政法学研究,2020(4):34-45.
[36]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[37]COGLIANESE C,LEHR D.Regulating by robot:administrative decision making in the machine-learning era[J].Georgetown Law Journal,2016,105(5):1147.
[38]汪庆华.算法透明的多重维度和算法问责[J].比较法研究,2020(6):163-173.
[39]肖红军.算法责任:理论证成、全景画像与治理范式[J].管理世界,2022,38(4):200-226.