面向新质生产力需求的高校人才队伍建设与发展模型及生态环境

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (8210 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper investigates the features of four different periods for the gestation,growth,development and maturation of innovative talents,and presents a model for the establishment and development of a high-level innovative talent team which consist of top-notch doctoral students and postdoctoral fellows,excellent young researchers,high-level leading experts and their innovative groups,together with top-tier experts or scientists.To meet the demands of developing new quality productive forces in a high-quality,with fully considering the principle in the energetic evolution of scientific and technological innovation activities,we systematically study the major roles in the four different periods,which are played by university innovative talent teams with corresponding high-qualitative activities for scientific and technological innovations.The model exhibits that research universities possess the characteristic advantages in four aspects such as interdisciplinary integrations,relatively stable financial supports,coherent cooperation and mutual support among universities,research institutes,governments and enterprises,and an open and inclusive academic ecology with long-term research and assessments.Finally,on the light of the successes of the high-level innovative talent teams established in four top Chinese universities,the paper addresses the corresponding measures and outcomes in construction of an optimal academic ecology to support strongly high-level scientific and technological innovation activities,which are important for promoting the development of new quality productivity forces,for research universities.

Key words： New quality productive forces Innovative talent team development model Academic ecology

Received: 23 April 2024

PACS:

G316

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xu Xuan
	Li Chen
	Qiu Yuan
	Zhang Hui

Cite this article:

Xu Xuan,Li Chen,Qiu Yuan, et al. Establishing Innovative Talent Teams to Support the Development of New Quality Productive Forces:A Model on the Establishment and Development of University Innovative Talent Teams and the Corresponding Ecosystem[J]. , 2024, 5(9): 156-165.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I9/156

[1]徐政,郑霖豪,程梦瑶.新质生产力赋能高质量发展的内在逻辑与实践构想[J].当代经济研究,2023,339(11):51-58.
[2]周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13.
[3]贾若祥,窦红涛.新质生产力:内涵特征、重大意义及发展重点[J].北京行政学院学报,2024(2):31-42.
[4]刘冬梅,杨瑞龙,朱旭峰,等.创新驱动新质生产力发展[J].中国科技论坛,2024(3):1-5.
[5]张辉,唐琦.新质生产力形成的条件、方向及着力点[J].学习与探索,2024(1):82-91.
[6]孙锐.为新质生产力发展提供人才引领支撑[J].人民论坛,2024(6):26-30.
[7]祝智庭,戴岭,赵晓伟.新质人才培养:数智时代教育的新使命[J].电化教育研究,2024(1):52-60.
[8]杨德广.努力培养与新质生产力相适应的新质人才[J].教育发展研究,2024,44(8):3-3.
[9]刘振天.新质生产力视域下高等教育强国建设的价值和使命[J].高校教育管理,2024(1):4-7.
[10]王洪才.大学在发展新质生产力中的使命与挑战[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),2024,26(3):7-14.
[11]刘少雪.面向创新型国家建设的科技领军人才成长研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[12]尹西明,陈劲,贾宝余.高水平科技自立自强视角下国家战略科技力量的突出特征与强化路径[J].中国科技论坛,2021(9):1-9.
[13]刘庆龄,曾立.国家战略科技力量主体构成及其功能形态研究[J].中国科技论坛,2022(5):1-10.
[14]BARTOLONI S,CALO E,MARINELLI L,et al.Towards designing society 5.0 solutions:the new quintuple helix-design thinking approach to technology[J].Technovation,2022,113(5):102413.
[15]ETZKOWITZ H.Innovation in innovation:the triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J].Social Science Information,2003,42(3):293-337.
[16]CLARYSSE B,WRIGHT M,BRUNEEL J,et al.Creating value in ecosystems:crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems[J].Research Policy,2014,43(7):1164-1176.
[17]彭华涛,彭琦辉.高校基础研究、应用研究与创新绩效[J].中国科技论坛,2023(11):46-55.
[18]张军.为推动新质生产力加快发展贡献新时代高等教育力量[J].红旗文稿,2024(5):4-8.
[19]林崇德,罗良.建设创新型国家与创新人才的培养[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(1):29-34.
[20]白春章,陈其荣,张慧洁.拔尖创新人才成长规律与培养模式研究述评[J].教育研究,2012(12):147-151.
[21]KRUGER S,STEYN A A.Developing breakthrough innovation capabilities in university ecosystems:a case study from South Africa[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2024,198:123002.
[22]张仁杰,寇焜照.从“拔尖”到“乐群”:小组合作学习与高校拔尖创新人才培养[J].重庆高教研究,2024(3):69-81.
[23]钟秉林,李传宗.科教融合培养拔尖创新人才的政策变迁与实践探索[J].中国高教研究,2024(1):33-40.
[24]张伟,徐广宇.高校顶尖青年人才的分布特征与集聚策略:基于国家级顶尖青年人才计划项目的比较分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2016(8):17-22.
[25]范内瓦·布什,拉什·霍尔特.科学:无尽的前沿[M].崔传刚,译.北京:中信出版社,2021.
[26]路甬祥.创新的启示:关于百年科技创新的若干思考[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2014.
[27]荣俊美,陈强,王倩倩,等.新形势下科技创新治理的规律认识[J].科学管理研究,2023,41(3):2-10.
[28]张旭.优化国家科研机构布局,提升创新体系整体效能[J].中国科技论坛,2023(5):3.
[29]路甬祥.规律与启示——从诺贝尔自然科学奖与20世纪重大科学成就看科技原始创新的规律[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2000,20(4):3-11.
[30]朱明明,万文涛.中美创新人才成长规律比较分析研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2017,38(4):209-217.
[31]王星,郭晓,付杨林.基于创新型人才阶段性素质特征的培养模式研究[J].科技与经济,2015(3):81-85.
[32]方勇,邵振权,冯勇.国家杰出青年科学基金项目负责人成长特征研究:基于学术生命周期理论与数据分析[J].中国高校科技,2021(7):28-33.
[33]李学成.科技创新人才可持续发展的规律性认知研究[J].创新科技,2019,19(5):55-60.
[34]郝天聪.我国高技能人才培养的误区及模式重构:基于高技能人才成长的视角[J].中国高教研究,2017(7):100-105.
[35]校友创建的公司每年收入超2万亿美元！一文带你了解麻省理工的科技创新和技术转移[EB/OL].(2023-10-04).https://www.sohu.com/a/725685278_121123735.
[36]Stanford Bio-X Hights.Bioscienceresearch news[EB/OL].(2022-04-27).https://bios.stanford.edu/highlights.
[37]姜绍华.解码斯坦福大学与硅谷共生机理[N].中国教育报,2021-09-30(9).
[38]陈伟斌,孙鋆,林键.国外创业型大学建设一流学科的经验与启示:基于麻省理工学院、斯坦福大学和华威大学的案例研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,35(5):125-132.
[39]刘辉,梁洪力.基于价值传导视角的科技人才评价改革机制研究[J].中国科技论坛,2024(2):158-167.
[40]关于印发《上海市颠覆性技术创新项目管理暂行办法》的通知[EB/OL].(2024-06-07).https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/gwk/search/content/11dc42f0e0ff4ac9adcaf9e90178bd04.
[41]杨芳,陈劲.发挥战略科学家基础研究中的帅才作用[EB/OL].(2023-05-23).https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1766649423834409663&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[42]宋永辉,马廷灿,岳名亮.中国优秀青年科技人才特征研究——以MIT TR35中国区获奖者为例[J].中国科技论坛,2023(5):99-109.
[43]王静,张延东.关于加大基础研究稳定支持力度的思考和建议[J].中国科技论坛,2008(5):20-23.