|
|
|
| Scientific and Technological Innovation Serves as the Core Element of Developing New Productivity:Theoretical Foundations, Historical Laws,and Practical Pathways |
| Liu Dongmei, Yang Yang, Li Zhe |
| Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development,Beijing 100038,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The new quality productivity possesses both the specificity of contemporary times and the universality of historical context,forming a social productivity system in conjunction with non-new quality productivity.“Scientific and technological innovation serves as the core element driving the development of new quality productivity”encompasses profound theoretical logic,historical logic,and practical logic,which are emphasized in terms of theoretical foundation,essential form,and ultimate objective of new quality productivity.To effectively leverage scientific and technological innovation as core elements:firstly,it is crucial to scientifically comprehend the strengths and weaknesses of various theoretical foundations pertaining to new quality productivity in order to avoid being confined within a single fixed theoretical framework or ideological system that may lead to cognitive and practical errors;Secondly,attention should be directed towards leading technologies and key components associated with the latest industrial revolution wave while enhancing national innovation system capabilities to expedite our country's transition onto a new“technology-economic”trajectory;Thirdly,understanding the laws governing innovation during this era is imperative for promoting paradigm shifts in scientific research along with deep-rooted technological innovation and entrepreneurship endeavors aimed at achieving more efficient knowledge production and allocation;Fourthly,establishing novel production relations guided by four favorable expectations encompassing scientific research,innovation,production processes as well as personal development is vital for forging close integration between scientific-technological innovations alongside institutional innovations thereby creating a“social capacity”.
|
|
Received: 01 June 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]赵峰,季雷.新质生产力的科学内涵、构成要素和制度保障机制[J].学习与探索,2024(1):92-101,175.
[2]张林,蒲清平.新质生产力的内涵特征、理论创新与价值意蕴[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2023,29(6):137-148.
[3]高帆.“新质生产力”的提出逻辑、多维内涵及时代意义[J].政治经济学评论,2023,14(6):127-145.
[4]湛泳,李胜楠.新质生产力推进产业链现代化:逻辑、机制与路径[J].改革,2024(5):54-63.
[5]王健.新质生产力对中国式产业链现代化的影响研究[J].工业技术经济,2024,43(6):3-11.
[6]叶祥松,殷红.产业结构变迁、产业互动与全要素生产率增长:基于动态结构的视角[J].经济学动态,2023(6):44-62.
[7]刘志彪,凌永辉,孙瑞东.新型支柱产业:发展新质生产力的主阵地与政策选择[J/OL].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版):1-14[2024-06-18].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/37.1100.C.20240607.1643.018.html.
[8]洪银兴.发展新质生产力建设现代化产业体系[J].当代经济研究,2024(2):7-9.
[9]中国社会科学院经济研究所课题组,黄群慧,杨耀武,等.结构变迁、效率变革与发展新质生产力[J].经济研究,2024,59(4):4-23.
[10]杨虎涛.从历史维度深化对新质生产力发展规律的认识[J].红旗文稿,2024(10):29-32.
[11]方敏,杨虎涛.政治经济学视域下的新质生产力及其形成发展[J].经济研究,2024,59(3):20-28.
[12]周文,许凌云.再论新质生产力:认识误区、形成条件与实现路径[J].改革,2024(3):26-37.
[13]郑永年.如何科学地理解“新质生产力”[J].中国科学院院刊,2024,39(5):797-803. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
