专利防御市场机制的设计与回报分析——以License on Transfer网络为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (4212 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The LOT (License on Transfer)network is a patent defense market mechanism to deal with the litigation risk of patent assertion entity,and its purpose is to reduce the patent risk of enterprises.However,it is not easy to quantify the returns from joining the LOT network.This paper briefly introduces the model to calculate the returns on investment in joining the LOT network,analyzes the benefits of Chinese enterprises joining the LOT network and the impact on their performance.We find that for the Chinese enterprises with significant overseas business,with patents only in narrower technology areas and with defensive patent strategies,joining the LOT network brings a higher return on their investment.This study provides references for Chinese enterprises to resist litigation risks of patent assertion entities,formulate patent defense strategies,and quantitatively evaluate the value of joining the LOT.

Key words： Patent protection Defense strategy LOT network Non-practicing entity Patent assertion entity

Received: 12 March 2020

PACS:

G306

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Lin Zhijian
	Shen Kai
	Huang Can
	Zhou Yuan

Cite this article:

Lin Zhijian,Shen Kai,Huang Can, et al. Design and Return of Patent Defense Market Mechanism ——A Case of License on Transfer Network[J]. , 2020, 1(12): 164-169.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I12/164

[1]胡向宏,韩伟.专利主张实体 (PAE)的反垄断应对[J].电子知识产权,2015 (12):33-39.
[2]吴晶晶.浅析非专利实施主体对专利运营的影响[J].中国发明与专利,2017,14 (6):24-27.
[3]U.S.Federal Trade Commission.The Evolving IP Marketplace:Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition[EB/OL]. (2011-03-07)[2020-03-12].https://www.ftc.gov/reports/evolving-ip-marketplace-aligning-patent-notice-remedies-competition.
[4]袁晓东,高璐琳.美国 “专利主张实体”商业模式、危害及应对政策研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34 (2):63-68.
[5]毛昊,尹志锋,张锦.策略性专利诉讼模式:基于非专利实施体多次诉讼的研究[J].中国工业经济,2017 (2):136-153.
[6]周星韬.非专利实施主体的专利权滥用行为及法律规制研究[D].上海:华东政法大学,2018.
[7]吴艳.美国政府涉及PAE的政策及其对我国的启示[J].电子知识产权,2013 (8):34-37.
[8]闫坤,张会丽,钱玲珑,等.中美欧NPE诉讼趋势研究[J].信息通信技术与政策,2018 (10):35-39.
[9]王嘉琮,汪金金.中国遭遇国际NPE大规模诉讼的可能性分析[J].科技与法律,2017 (6):66-77.
[10]刘政,罗如意,钱种明,等.非专利实施主体的发展及其对我国专利运营模式的启示[J].科技管理研究,2018,38 (7):200-205.
[11]郭如愿.比较法视角下NPE对我国企业专利诉讼的启示[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2017,32 (2):113-118.
[12]JAMES K,NADER M.Why smart corporate ip strategies need licence on transfer[EB/OL]. (2017-02-01)[2020-03-12].https://www.iam-media.com/defensive-aggregation/why-smart-corporate-ip-strategies-need-licence-transfer.
[13]RICHARDSON K,OLIVER E.Join a defensive aggregator and what is your financial return[EB/OL]. (2017-06-01)[2020-03-12].https://www.iam-media.com/defensive-aggregation/join-defensive-aggregator-and-what-your-financial-return.