Trump 2.0 Administration's AI Governance in the United States from the Regional and National Perspective: Logical Deconstruction,Impact on China and Response Strategies
Zhang Shengwei
School of Law,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China
Abstract：Artificial intelligence governance stands as a critical issue for major political economies. Clarifying the governance logic behind the latest AI policy development of the Trump 2.0 administration holds practical importance for China to make forward-looking assessments and conduct high-quality AI governance. Grounded in a regional and national perspective,this article employs the“actor-temporality-factor”analytical framework to deconstruct U.S. AI governance logic across three dimensions:actors,temporality,and factors. Its essence represents a contemporary projection of“America first”into the field of technology governance,aimed at optimizing the allocation of key resources. In the foreseeable future,the formulation of U.S. AI-related legislation,regulatory boundaries,and governance orientations will exhibit increasingly pronounced characteristics of politicization,radicalization,and extremism. Against this backdrop,China's AI governance should adopt a two-stage adaptive approach. Domestically,China should establish a practical path driven by a holistic approach to national security to achieve“steady yet swift progress”in AI development. At the international level,China should coordinate and promote domestic and international AI governance,using a more open Chinese approach to build and lead a global paradigm of good AI governance.
张晟炜. 区域国别视域下特朗普2.0美国人工智能治理研究:逻辑解构、对华影响与应对策略[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(5): 172-180.
Zhang Shengwei. Trump 2.0 Administration's AI Governance in the United States from the Regional and National Perspective: Logical Deconstruction,Impact on China and Response Strategies. , 2026(5): 172-180.
[1] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议[N].人民日报,2025-10-29(1). [2] The White House.White House Unveils America's AI Action Plan[EB/OL].(2025-07-23)[2025-07-31].https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/07/white-house-unveils-americas-ai-action-plan/. [3] The White House.National Security Strategy of the United States of America[EB/OL].(2025-12-04)[2025-12-10].https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf. [4] The White House.Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence[EB/OL].(2025-12-11)[2025-12-18].https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/eliminating-state-law-obstruction-of-national-artificial-intelligence-policy/. [5] 李强.“十五五”时期经济社会发展的指导方针[N].人民日报,2025-10-30(3). [6] 刘恩东,王经民.人类命运共同体理念的科学体系与实践路径[J].新视野,2025(5):5-15. [7] 张晟炜.《美国人工智能行动计划》的底层逻辑、落地图景与中国因应.贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2026(2):115-127. [8] 国务院学位委员会第八届学科评议组、全国专业学位研究生教育指导委员会.研究生教育学科专业简介及其学位基本要求(试行版)[EB/OL].(2024-01-22)[2025-09-14] https://www.acge.org.cn/encyclopediaFront/enterEncyclopediaIndex. [9] 张晟炜.区域国别视域下《AI公约》的解读及其对中国人工智能治理的影响:动因、风险与因应[J].中国科技论坛,2025(8):181-188. [10] 张天宇,高良谋.时空重塑:技术演进对时空观念变革的影响[J].自然辩证法通讯,2026(1):82-89. [11] 王秉,王渊洁.综合人工智能安全:人工智能与安全的共舞[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2025(3):37-49. [12] 胡莹.比较视野中的数据生产力:形成路径与作用机制[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026(1):40-50. [13] 刘典.AI风暴:中美博弈与全球新秩序[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2025. [14] 塞德里克·迪朗.技术封建主义[M].陈荣钢,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2024. [15] Nadibaidze A.Startups envisioning algorithmic warfare:The discourses of US tech companies in defense AI[J].Global Policy,2025(3):487-493. [16] 蔡翠红,李煜华.科技右翼与美国科技安全战略转型[J].国际安全研究,2025(3):3-34,154. [17] DELEHANTY J.Sacred canopies and special things:Myth and modernity in Trump's return[J].Contemporary Sociology,2025(5):371-375. [18] MADSEN Ø D.Algorithmic charisma under strain:Elon Musk and the dynamics of founder myths in the platform era[J].Administrative Sciences,2025(10):394. [19] 史泽华.技术右翼及其与特朗普2.0政府的互动[J].当代美国评论,2025(3):25-44. [20] 付文广.从门罗主义到威尔逊主义:文本与阐释[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2025. [21] 景璟.全球治理理论体系的反思与重塑[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2024. [22] 陈云松.数智文化企业的中国范式:双轮驱动的科技与文化协同[J].学海,2025(2):38-45. [23] 李昀.杜鲁门主义之争与战后初期美国自我形象的重构[J].世界历史,2025(5):77-93. [24] COOPER J.Roundtable:Revisiting the 1984 US presidential election[J].Journal of Transatlantic Studies,2025(4):328-347. [25] KOTZUR M.Europe's quest for strategic autonomy in response to trumpism[J].Global Public Policy and Governance,2025(4):457-466. [26] 戚聿东,栾菁.放松规制与经济增长:来自美国百年来四次“黄金增长期”的证据[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(5):148-157. [27] U.S.Department of State.Agency Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2026-2030[EB/OL].(2026-01-16)[2026-01-25].https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Agency-Strategic-Plan-for-Fiscal-Years-2026-2030.pdf. [28] 王林.美国算力热潮背后的“AI泡沫”之忧[N].中国能源报,2026-01-05(5). [29] 罗志恒,晁云霞,马家进.美国联邦政府债务:从财政困局到治理危机[J].国际经济评论,2026(1):83. [30] 徐康宁.美国复兴制造业战略的迷思、前景与影响[J].世界经济研究,2025(12):3-11,132. [31] 郭畅,冯晓青.进攻性技术民族主义与特朗普2.0时期的美国对华人工智能战略[J].太平洋学报,2025(11):58-73. [32] 约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨.全球化逆潮[M].李杨,唐克,章添香,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2025:57-66. [33] 杨春蕾.耐心资本赋能人工智能产业:逻辑、困境与对策[J].南京社会科学,2025(8):57-66. [34] 王禄生.论法律领域对法律大模型的能动塑造[J].中国法学,2025(3):45-64. [35] 黄满盈,王中慧,郑艺君.共建“一带一路”与海外利益保护:风险洞察及对策构建[J].国际贸易,2025(6):43-54,64. [36] 杜宏巍.数智技术创新体系变革与未来发展[J].行政管理改革,2025(5):65-73. [37] 许可.包容审慎2.0范式:化解人工智能的“步调难题”[J].行政法学研究,2026(2):62-78. [38] 《总体国家安全观十周年》编写组.总体国家安全观十周年:媒体呈现与传播概览[M].北京:人民出版社,2024. [39] 徐磊.欧盟人工智能监管沙盒的制度构造与经验启示[J].科技管理研究,2025(9):21-30. [40] 何柏生.数字与法律的科学化[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2024. [41] 肖永平.涉外法律关系论纲[J].政法论坛,2026(1):15-31.
2026, 
