The Collaboration in Industrial Chain for Breakthroughs in Core Technologies in Key Fields:An Analysis Framework of Subject, Power and Element Dimensions
Sun Leihua1,2, Liang Zheng1,2, He Haiyan3, Zhang Yadong4
1. School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. China Institute for Science and Technology Policy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3. Greater Bay Area Institute of Digital Economy and Science & Technology Collaborative Innovation, Zhuhai 519088, China; 4. School of Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract：Against the backdrop of an accelerating restructuring of global industrial chains,China faces comprehensive blockade restrictions from the United States and its allies as it moves toward the mid-to-high end of these chains.How to leverage industrial chain collaboration to stimulate breakthroughs in core technologies in key fields,thereby supporting China's high-level integration into the global division of labor system,has become a critical concern for theoretical research,practical exploration,and policy formulation.However,research on core technology breakthroughs from the perspective of industrial chain collaboration encounters challenges such as the inability of single theories to adequately explain complex patterns and the lack of timely empirical support for impact effects,highlighting the absence of an integrated analytical framework.To address these bottlenecks,this study first develops a conceptual and representational framework for core technology breakthroughs through industrial chain collaboration based on an “analogy-connotation-representation”analytical paradigm.Drawing on theories such as “hard-soft”systems engineering,bionic management,total innovation management,and collaborative innovation,the framework is constructed across three dimensions including subject,power and element.It clarifies behavioral relationships through subject collaboration,reveals internal driving forces through power collaboration,and optimizes resource allocation logic through element collaboration,forming a multidimensional and systematic analytical tool.Next,the overall logic,basic composition,and mechanisms of this framework are systematically elucidated through three-dimensional,top-view,and cross-sectional diagrams.Subsequently,empirical analysis is conducted to validate the framework,revealing that collaboration in the subject dimension (exemplified by chain leaders and core enterprises),the power dimension (exemplified by industry-innovation chain synergy),and the element dimension (exemplified by factor market synergy)significantly contributes to core technology breakthroughs.Finally,the study concludes with insights on enhancing the core technology breakthrough system through multidimensional industrial chain collaboration.This multidimensional analytical framework is theoretically and empirically extensible,bridging the theoretical,practical,and empirical aspects of research in this domain.It provides systematic theoretical support and practical guidance for China to break through technological blockades and build a modern,autonomous,and controllable industrial system.
孙磊华, 梁正, 何海燕, 张亚东. 产业链协同突破关键核心技术:“主体—动力—要素”维度的分析框架[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(1): 52-60.
Sun Leihua, Liang Zheng, He Haiyan, Zhang Yadong. The Collaboration in Industrial Chain for Breakthroughs in Core Technologies in Key Fields:An Analysis Framework of Subject, Power and Element Dimensions. , 2026(1): 52-60.
[1]郑永年.中国跨越“中等技术陷阱”的策略研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2023(11):1579-1592. [2]陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦.“十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解:识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J].改革,2020(12):5-15. [3]梁正.新型举国体制驱动国家尖端核心技术的实践与思考[J].国家治理,2020(47):55-58. [4]张玉臣,仪静雯,廖凯诚.关键核心技术演化规律及发展趋势研究 [J].中国科技论坛,2023(12):28-37. [5]许学国,刘凤梅,周诗雨.基于创新质量的关键核心技术攻关组态路径研究:以集成电路为例 [J].中国科技论坛,2024(2):49-60. [6]BATTKE B,SCHMIDT T S,STEPHAN S,et al.Internal or external spillovers:Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies[J].Research Policy,2016,45(1):27-41. [7]SIRMON D G,HITT M A,IRELAND R D.Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value:Looking inside the black box[J].Academy of Management Review,2007,32(1):273-292. [8]RITALA P,HURMELINNA P L.Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition:The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2013,30(1):154-169. [9]张杰,陈容.产业链视角下中国关键核心技术创新的突破路径与对策[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2022(2):116-126. [10]张亚东,何海燕,孙磊华,等.关键核心技术壁垒对软件产业安全的影响及应对策略研究 [J].中国科技论坛,2024(9):57-65,78. [11]龚勤林.论产业链构建与城乡统筹发展[J].经济学家,2004(3):121-123. [12]刘贵富,赵英才.产业链:内涵、特性及其表现形式[J].财经理论与实践,2006(3):114-117. [13]芮明杰,刘明宇.产业链整合理论述评[J].产业经济研究,2006(3):60-66. [14]刘洪伟,和金生,马丽丽.知识发酵—知识管理的仿生学理论初探[J].科学学研究,2003(5):514-518. [15]许庆瑞,郑刚,喻子达,等.全面创新管理(TIM):企业创新管理的新趋势:基于海尔集团的案例研究[J].科研管理,2003(5):1-7. [16]SERRANO V,FISCHER T.Collaborative innovation in ubiquitous systems[J].Journal of intelligent manufacturing,2007,18(5):599-615. [17]陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012(2):161-164. [18]孙磊华,梁正,张亚东.关键核心技术突破:框架构建、特征分析与策略建议[J].科学管理研究,2025,43(3):23-30. [19]孙磊华,何海燕,常晓涵,等.军民深度协同对企业关键核心技术突破的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2022(23):128-139.
2026, 
