Abstract：The setting of roles and its relationship in the main National S&T programs have effect on the performance of project governance directly.Since the establishment of S&T program in 1983,it has been adjusted and reformed constantly.Analyzing its evolution has basic significance for better project government.This paper investigated the evolution of roles and its relationship in the past National S&T program by separating the roles into sponsor,implementation partner and contractor.It was found that the main National S&T programs had experienced three phases,which are setting up,scaling up and governance reforming.The implementation partners were characterized by role type enlarging and function differentiation.Contractors begun to manage contractors during the later stage,which was a result of demand on integrated and consistent management.The sponsors' classified management of scientific research stage has evolved into unified governance.It made the project governance being complicated and challenging.
卫新锋. 国家主体科技计划项目治理模式的演变[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(4): 11-18.
Wei Xinfeng. The Evolution of Project Governance in the Main National S&T Programs. , 2020(4): 11-18.
[1]TOO E G,WEAVER P.The management of project management:a conceptual framework for project governance[J].International journal of project management,2014,32 (8):1382-1394. [2]黄晓霞,丁荣贵,于双阳,等.多主体协同创新项目治理网络构建——基于欧盟第七框架计划的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (12):98-108. [3]丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式研究框架[J].中国软科学,2008 (9):101-111. [4]AHOLA T,RUUSKA I,ARTTO K,et al.What is project governance and what are its origins[J].International journal of project management,2014,32 (8):1321-1332. [5]BIESENTHAL C,WILDEN R.Multi-level project governance:trends and opportunities[J].International journal of project management,2014,32 (8):1291-1308. [6]常宏建,吴彬.政府投资科研项目的分类治理研究[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2009 (1):37-42. [7]李栋亮.委托代理视角下的科技项目管理问题研究[J].科学学研究,2007 (5):915-918. [8]ERNØ-KJØLHEDE E.Project management theory and the management of research projects[R].Copenhagen:Copenhagen Business School,2000. [9]TURNER J R,MÜLLER R.Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent[J].European management journal,2004,22 (3):327-336. [10]黄德平.委托代理视角下的课题制管理研究[J].科技管理研究,2010,30 (22):230-232. [11]黄宁清.基于委托代理关系下基础研究科研单位科研项目管理问题及对策[J].科技管理研究,2009,29 (9):216-218. [12]STETTINA C J.Governance of innovation project management:necessary and neglected[D]Leiden:Leiden University,2015. [13]阿儒涵,李晓轩.我国政府科技资源配置的问题分析——基于委托代理理论视角[J].科学学研究,2014,32 (2):276-281. [14]王明明,贺雅丽,徐磊.国家科技计划项目委托代理博弈分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30 (2):34-39. [15]严玲,赵黎明.政府投资项目双层多级委托代理链的分析[J].财经问题研究,2005 (12):41-47. [16]李丽亚,李莹.国家科技计划体系及其管理的演变[J].中国科技论坛,2008 (8):6-11. [17]赵捷.国家科技计划体系管理改革回顾与分析[J].创新科技,2009 (2):22-25. [18]智强,杨英.科学家在公共研发计划决策过程中的作用——以三大国家科技计划为例[J].科研管理,2014,35 (5):118-127. [19]赵红光.科技计划管理改革之路任重道远[J].中国农村科技,2015 (4):34-35. [20]科技部发展计划司. 《国家科技计划年度报告》 (2004—2014年)[R/OL].http://www.most.gov.cn/ndbg. [21]房卫东,张为,汤羿.科研院所分支机构的科研项目管理模式研究[J].科学管理研究,2010,28 (3):30-34. [22]郝艳莉.科技型国有企业科研项目管理存在的问题及对策分析[J].管理观察,2017 (10):54-55. [23]朱斌,古阳.高校科研项目管理中存在的问题及对策研究[J].中国管理信息化,2017,20 (17):256-257.
2020, 
