Policy Driving or Resource Exchange——A Study about International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of China's State Key Laboratory
Zhang Mengya1,2, Wang Xingmin2,3, Sun Yi4,5
1. School of Humanities and Law, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 2. Center for Beijing-Tianjing-Hebei Development Studies, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 3. School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 4. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 5. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract：International scientific and technological cooperation is one of crucial ways to improve the innovation capability,and its driving factors have attracted the attention of researchers in this field.Selecting China State Key Laboratories'(SKLs')as the research object and aiming at the scientists working in the SKLs,this paper discussed the mechanism of the SKLs' international scientific and technological cooperation from the view of policy environment and resource exchange by adopting Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis(FsQCA)using the 318 questionnaires.The results are as follows.The policy environment factors and resource exchange factors have produced synergy to influence the SKLs' international scientific and technological cooperation.However,the paths are characterized by key factors.The policy driven model is reflected in the friendly international situation driven model with high international situation as the main factor,the resource exchange driven models are reflected in the reciprocity driven model with high collaboration reciprocity as the main factor,and in the continuous driven model with high collaboration continuity as the main factor.At last,this paper put forward the policy to develop the international scientific and technological cooperation of the SKLs.
张孟亚, 王兴民, 孙翊. 政策驱动还是资源交换——基于全国重点实验室国际科技合作研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(5): 40-49.
Zhang Mengya, Wang Xingmin, Sun Yi. Policy Driving or Resource Exchange——A Study about International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of China's State Key Laboratory. , 2025(5): 40-49.
[1] ZHANG L,CAO Z,SIVERTSEN G,et al.The influence of geopolitics on research activity and international collaboration in science:The case of Russia[J].Scientometrics,2024,129(10):6007-6021. [2] CHEN K H,ZHANG Y,FU X L.International research collaboration:An emerging domain of innovation studies[J].Research Policy,2019,48(1):149-168. [3] GÖK A,KARAULOVA M.How“international”is international research collaboration[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2024,75(2):97-114. [4] DOSSO M,CASSI L,MESCHEBA W.Towards regional scientific integration in Africa? Evidence from co-publications[J].Research Policy,2023,52(1):17. [5] DUA J,LATHABAI H H,SINGH V K.Measuring and characterizing research collaboration in SAARC countries[J].Scientometrics,2023,128(2):1265-1294. [6] KATZ J S,MARTIN B R.What is research collaboration[J].Research Policy,1997,26(1):1-18. [7] 张战仁,张润强,杨晓雪.全球研发网络的中心嵌入结构及因素研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021(3):53-63. [8] 顾伟男,刘慧,王亮.“一带一路”沿线国家科研合作网络的多元结构及形成机制[J].地理研究,2020,39(5):1070-1087. [9] ZANOTTO S R,HAEFFNER C,GUIMARAES J A.Unbalanced international collaboration affects adversely the usefulness of countries' scientific output as well as their technological and social impact[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(3):1789-1814. [10] 陈秀娟,张志强.我国政府资助的国际合作研究项目特征分析[J].科学学研究,2020,38(1):85-96. [11] COONEY-O'DONOGHUE D.The politics of stemm collaboration between Australia and China:National security,geopolitics,and academic freedom[J].Asian Studies Review,2024,48(4):745-768. [12] SONNENWALD D H.Scientific collaboration:A synthesis of challenges and strategies[J].Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,2007,41:643-81. [13] MOLM L D.Coercive power in social exchange[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University press,1997. [14] HOU L,PAN Y L,ZHU J J H.Impact of scientific,economic,geopolitical,and cultural factors on international research collaboration[J].Journal of Informetrics,2021,15(3):12. [15] HEISER R E.The emergence of the open research university through international research collaboration[J].International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,2023,24(3):99-124. [16] HAYATI Z,DIDEGAH F.International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998—2007[J].Library Hi Tech,2010,28(3):433-446. [17] BEN-ARI A,ENOSH G.Power relations and reciprocity:Dialectics of knowledge construction[J].Qualitative Health Research,2013,23(3):422-429. [18] HAU Y S,KIM B,LEE H,et al.The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees' tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions[J].International Journal of Information Management,2013,33(2):356-366. [19] WANG W,REN J,ALRASHOUD M,et al.Early-stage reciprocity in sustainable scientific collaboration[J].Journal of Informetrics,2020,14(3):11. [20] LIN N.Social capital:A theory of social structure and action[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001:70-77. [21] CHEN C J,HUNG S W.To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities[J].Information & Management,2010,47(4):226-236. [22] RAGIN C C,FISS P C.Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis:An empirical demonstration[M]//RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2008.
2025, 
