Abstract：The doctoral training model is a critical factor influencing the quality of doctoral education and the cultivation of high-level innovative talents,and its optimization directly and profoundly shapes the development of new quality productive forces.Currently,China's doctoral training system predominantly adopts the“single-supervisor model,”which has led to structural limitations such as disciplinary knowledge homogenization,insufficient integration of research and teaching,and constrained interdisciplinary collaboration.These issues hinder the cultivation of top-tier innovative talents required for advancing new quality productive forces.To address this,this paper examines the PTN program as a case study,analyzing how its“rotation-based training model”enhances innovative thinking,fosters original research capabilities,and promotes interdisciplinary and practice-oriented skill development,thereby providing robust talent support for new quality productive forces.The study reveals that the PTN program,through innovative admission mechanisms,curriculum design,and training frameworks,significantly strengthens doctoral candidates'creativity and practical competencies,contributing to both high-caliber human capital and cutting-edge scientific achievements essential for new quality productive forces.Accordingly,this paper proposes scaling up the PTN experience by developing discipline-specific rotation-based models,establishing collaborative platforms to transcend traditional training boundaries,and constructing a scientific evaluation system.Such reforms aim to cultivate globally competitive,cross-disciplinary,and practice-driven innovators,thereby sustaining the evolution of new quality productive forces.
韩凤芹, 杨小强. 创新博士生培养模式促进新质生产力形成——以PTN项目为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(5): 120-127.
Han Fengqin, Yang Xiaoqiang. Innovative Doctoral Training Models to Promote the Formation of New Quality Productive Forces——Taking the PTN Project as an Example. , 2025(5): 120-127.
[1] 刘洋.深刻理解和把握发展新质生产力的内涵要义[J].红旗文稿,2023(24):20-22. [2] 闵维方.教育促进经济增长的作用机制研究[J].北京大学教育评论,2017,15(3):123-136,190-191. [3] 李奕.加快形成新质生产力的教育贡献:来自首都高等教育高质量发展的实践与启示[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2023(10):11-14. [4] 祝智庭,戴岭,赵晓伟,等.新质人才培养:数智时代教育的新使命[J].电化教育研究,2024,45(1):52-60. [5] 王顶明,黄葱.以博士生教育高质量发展促进新质生产力形成[J].学位与研究生教育,2024(4):58-65. [6] 韩婕.全国两会代表委员热议:强化人才引领发展新质生产力[J].中国人才,2024(3):20-21. [7] 姜朝晖,金紫薇.教育赋能新质生产力:理论逻辑与实践路径[J].重庆高教研究,2024,12(1):108-117. [8] 许恒兵.新质生产力:科学内涵、战略考量与理论贡献[J].南京社会科学,2024(3):1-9. [9] 刘洋.深刻理解和把握发展新质生产力的内涵要义[J].红旗文稿,2023(24):20-22. [10] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13. [11] 王政,刘温馨.如何发展新质生产力[N].人民日报,2024-01-15(1). [12] 蒲清平,向往.新质生产力的内涵特征、内在逻辑和实现途径:推进中国式现代化的新动能[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,45(1):77-85. [13] 赵世奎,吴彬.中国博士生教育改革的逻辑、路径和张力[J].学位与研究生教育,2019(11):14-19. [14] 唐润,尹星.研究生教育中的师生博弈关系及管理策略分析[J].研究生教育研究,2018(6):70-75. [15] LAWRANCE F P.Strengthening field education in aging through university-community partnerships[J].Journal of Gerontological Social Work,2007(50):135-154. [16] 李祖超,杨淞月.美日高校拔尖创新人才培养制度比较分析[J].中国高教研究,2011(8):69-72. [17] DROLET B C,BROWER J P,LAPORTE D,et al.Orthopaedic surgery residency:Perspectives of applicants and program directors on medical student away rotations[J].Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,2017(25):61-68. [18] 孙锐.为新质生产力发展提供人才引领支撑[J].人民论坛,2024(6):26-30. [19] 王成斌.创新体制机制,使高校成为新质生产力的源头活水[J].江苏高教,2024(5):25-27. [20] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13. [21] 李刚,赵佳琦,王嘉琦.以新质课程建设赋能新质生产力发展:理论剖析与设计思路[J].天津师范大学学报(基础教育版),2024,25(4):7-12.
2025, 
