Abstract：Data rights confirmation is an important prerequisite for data security and marketization of data elements.The analysis of data rights confirmation policy can provide theoretical support for the design of the basic system of data rights confirmation in China,and also help provide key guidelines for other subjects' rights confirmation practice.Taking 64 local policy texts from 2016 to 2024 as the research object,this paper extracts a TOE framework data rights confirmation that is mutually supplemented by technology,organization and environment by adopting the grounded theory.However,China's data rights confirmation faces challenges such as technological lag,unsystematic system and weak environment.Based on USA and EU experiences,the system of data rights confirmation should be balanced,and within the TOE framework,the standardization and flexibility of the data rights confirmation system should be shaped by focusing on technological breakthroughs and applications,adhering to institutional coordination and resource clarity,and emphasizing the integration of “soft” and “hard” systems.This would achieve an advanced path for data rights confirmation for better adapting to the process of data governance.
郭彦彦, 吴福象. 中国数据确权的策略特征及其制度进阶路径——基于地方政策文本的扎根分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(11): 140-150.
Guo Yanyan, Wu Fuxiang. The Strategic Characteristics and Institutional Path on the Data Rights Confirmation in China——Grounded Analysis Based on Local Policy Texts. , 2025(11): 140-150.
[1]O′LEARY D E.Artificial intelligence and big data[J].IEEE Intelligent Systems,2013,28 (2):96-99. [2]ACQUISTI A,TAYLOR C,WAGMAN L.The economics of privacy[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2016,54 (2):442-492. [3]承上.数据隐私的权利保护与反垄断监管的协同实施[J].情报杂志,2023,42 (6):170-179. [4]陈肇新.要素驱动的数据确权之法理证成[J].上海政法学院学报 (法治论丛),2021,36 (4):131-145. [5]黄东东,陈雅欣.剩余控制权机制设计与数据流通秩序的法律治理[J].重庆大学学报 (社会科学版),2023,29 (4):179-190. [6]程啸.论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J].中国社会科学,2018 (3):102-122. [7]申卫星.论数据用益权[J].中国社会科学,2020 (11):110-131. [8]彭云.大数据环境下数据确权问题研究[J].现代电信科技,2016,46 (5):17-20. [9]文禹衡,付张祎.基于扎根理论的我国数据确权地方立法策略及其调整[J].图书情报工作,2023,67 (7):53-66. [10]康宁.数据确权的技术路径、模式选择与规范建构[J].清华法学,2023,17 (3):158-173. [11]GROSSMAN S J,HART O D.The costs and benefits of ownership:A theory of vertical and lateral integration[J].Journal of Political Economy,1986 (4):691-719. [12]HART O,MOORE J.Property rights and the nature of the firm[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98 (6):1119-1158. [13]彭辉.数据交易的困境与纾解:基于不完全契约性视角[J].比较法研究,2023 (2):172-185. [14]龚强,班铭媛,刘冲.数据交易之悖论与突破:不完全契约视角[J].经济研究,2022,57 (7):172-188. [15]何柯,陈悦之,陈家泽.数据确权的理论逻辑与路径设计[J].财经科学,2021 (3):43-55. [16]LESSIG L.Code:Version 2.0[M].New York:Basic Books,2006. [17]刘春年,佟雪.制度文本理论下的中外大数据安全政策比较[J].情报理论与实践,2022,45 (11):68-77. [18]冉连,张曦.地方政府数据开放中的数据安全政策研究:基于全国33个地级市政策文本的内容分析[J].情报杂志,2020,39 (11):96-103. [19]徐伟,何野.生成式人工智能数据安全风险的治理体系及优化路径:基于38份政策文本的扎根分析[J].电子政务,2024 (10):42-58. [20]黄海瑛,文禹衡.我国数据产权的政策计量与优化[J].图书馆论坛,2022,42 (3):18-30. [21]文禹衡,付张祎.基于计量分析的我国数据确权政策与科研协同研究[J].现代情报,2022,42 (10):58-70. [22]秦顺.循证政策视角下我国数据确权的法理解析与规范路径[J].图书馆建设,2022 (2):58-69. [23]周毅,陈必坤,马江华,等.基于文本量化分析的我国公共数据治理政策发展研究[J].情报学报,2023,42 (4):436-452. [24]彭丽徽,刘洋,张艳丰.我国公共数据治理政策的演进脉络及文本量化分析[J].图书馆学研究,2024 (10):61-77. [25]LIANG Y K,QI G J,WEI K N,et al.Exploring the determinant and influence mechanism of e-government cloud adoption in government agencies in China[J].Government Information Quarterly,2017,34 (3):481-495. [26]谢波,陈晨.人工智能算法安全治理的欧美经验与中国路径[J].中国科技论坛,2025 (8):172-180. [27]谈晓文.欧盟数据共享治理模式研究及中国镜鉴[J].德国研究,2024,39 (5):113-133. [28]ZHAO J,LIU H,ZHANG S,et al. A “five rights separation”framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation[J/OL].Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,1-17(2025-02-14)[2025-09-16].https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04452-4. [29]HARRIS T L,WYNDHAM J M.Data rights and responsibilities:A human rights perspective on data sharing[J].Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,2015,10 (3):334-337. [30]KEENAN B,HILDEBRANDT M.Smart technologies and the end (s)of law[J].Modern Law Review,2016,79 (4):733-738.
2025, 
