An Analysis of the Ambidextrous Innovation Path of Chinese High-Growth Enterprises ——Take the Gazelle Enterprise in the Self-Created Area of Southern Jiangsu as an Example
Wang Tao, Wang Luwei, Chu Shanshan
School of Geographical Sciences,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China
Abstract：The innovation-driven productivity shows a series effect,which is an important reason for the explosive growth of the new economy triggered by the rapid growth of a large number of Gazelle enterprises.All regional governments are paying more and more attention to the driving effect of high-growth enterprises' innovation capabilities on the local economy and the demonstration effect of ambidextrous innovation paths on traditional enterprises.Taking the Gazelle enterprises in the Southern Jiangsu National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone as the research subject this article established an innovation cooperation network from 2004 to 2018.By using a hierarchical regression model this article tested the effect of network location,knowledge search and relationship strength on ambidextrous innovation for exploring the specific path of ambidextrous innovation of Gazelle enterprises in stages.The results are as follows.①Network location has a significant positive impact on the ambidextrous innovation,among which network centrality is more important for incremental innovation,and structural hole is more important for breakthrough innovation.②Knowledge search has a significant mediating effect in the process of network location promoting ambidextrous innovation.The depth of knowledge search is more conducive to incremental innovation,and the width of knowledge search is more conducive to breakthrough innovation.③Relationship strength plays a positive role in the process of network location and knowledge search in promoting incremental innovation,and plays a negative role in the process of promoting breakthrough innovation.④The network location,knowledge search,and relationship strength of incremental innovation-led companies and breakthrough innovation-led companies have evolved over time,showing distinct characteristics,which makes them have significant differences in the choice of innovation paths.
汪涛, 王璐玮, 储姗姗. 中国高成长企业的双元创新路径探析——以苏南自创区瞪羚企业为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(11): 57-68.
Wang Tao, Wang Luwei, Chu Shanshan. An Analysis of the Ambidextrous Innovation Path of Chinese High-Growth Enterprises ——Take the Gazelle Enterprise in the Self-Created Area of Southern Jiangsu as an Example. , 2021(11): 57-68.
[1]胡海青,李浩.加速器支持、环境动态性与瞪羚企业突破式创新[J].科研管理,2015,36(12):47-55. [2]奚雷,彭灿,李德强.双元学习对双元创新及其协同性的交互影响[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(15):192-196. [3]王佳丽.双元创新的文献综述[J].现代商贸工业,2018,39(18):176-177. [4]亢秀秋,沈颂东,房建奇.探索式与利用式创新研究的热点与前沿——可视化研究[J].技术经济,2019,38(1):63-80. [5]窦军生,张钢.组织二元性:离新的组织研究范式还有多远[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,48(6):155-170. [6]王灿昊,段宇锋.组织双元性:概念内涵、身份模糊及实现路径探析[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(18):217-224. [7]刘洁,梁淑茵,何小文.组织惯性、网络位置与双元技术创新实证研究——基于广东省制造企业数据[J].软科学,2017,31(7):24-28. [8]朱向琳,杨乃定,张明珍.企业创新行为:度量方法和影响因素研究评述[J].科研管理,2020,41(12):131-138. [9]曾德明,文金艳.协作研发网络中心度、知识距离对企业二元式创新的影响[J].管理学报,2015,12(10):1479-1486. [10]杨金玉,陈世强.合作研发网络与企业二元创新——路径依赖导向的调节作用[J].工业技术经济,2020,39(6):21-28. [11]胡冬梅,陈维政.双元战略及其实现路径[J].软科学,2012,26(10):30-34. [12]任峥,王富,宋合义.基于组织前因视角的双元性创新路径研究——以格力为例[J].中国人力资源开发,2017,29(6):116-122. [13]熊正德,魏唯,顾晓青.网络位置、跨界搜索与制造企业服务创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2020,38(7):1304-1316. [14]BROWN J S,DUGUID P.Organizational learning and communities of practice:toward a unified view of working,learning,and innovation[J].Organization science,1991,2(1):40-57. [15]钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010,26(5):118-129. [16]POWELL W W,KOPUT K W,SMITH-DOERR L.Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:networks of learning in biotechnology[J].Administrative science quarterly,1996,41(1):116-145. [17]方世世,周立军,杨静,等.国家标准合作网络结构特征及驱动模式——以数字经济领域为例[J].中国科技论坛,2020,36(5):82-90+117. [18]王卓,王宏起,李玥.能力—治理视角下网络结构对技术能力的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2020(1):88-95+106. [19]田增瑞,高庆浩,宋雅雯,等.网络位置、经营时间与创业投资机构投资绩效[J].中国科技论坛,2019(5):77-86. [20]NELSON R R.Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change[J].Journal of economic literature,1995,33(1):48-90. [21]徐建中,李奉书,潘伟,等.双元知识搜索对企业创新绩效的影响:市场导向的调节作用[J].中国科技论坛,2019(7):119-127. [22]WU A,WEI J.Effects of geographic search on product innovation in industrial cluster firms in China[J].Management and organization review,2013,9(3):465-487. [23]LAURSEN K.Keep searching and you'll find,what do we know about variety creation through firms' search activities for innovation[J].Industrial and corporate change,2012,21(5):1181-1220. [24]邬爱其,李生校.外部创新搜寻战略与新创集群企业产品创新[J].科研管理,2012,33(7):1-7. [25]梁子涵.生物医药企业知识搜索行为的前因研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015. [26]CHEN J,CHEN Y F,VANHAVERBEKE W.The influence of scope,depth,and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms[J].Technovation,2011,31(8):362-373. [27]苏道明,吴宗法,刘臣.外部知识搜索及其二元效应对创新绩效的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(8):109-121. [28]王娟茹,李苹.外部知识搜索对制造企业技术创新的影响——知识协奏能力的中介作用与创新意愿的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(3):81-87. [29]伍勇,魏泽龙.知识探索,资源整合方式与突破性创新[J].科研管理,2017,38(12):11-19. [30]STEPHEN R,NOLA H.Knowledge stocks,knowledge flows and innovation:evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data[J].Research policy,2015,44(7):1327-1340. [31]张梦晓,高良谋.组织学习与组织创新关系的元分析——维度分化和边界效应[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(19):17-23. [32]LUISA M F,COOPER S Y,OLTRA M J.External knowledge search,absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms[J].European management journal,2018,36(2):183-194. [33]BERLIANT M,REED R R,WANG P.Knowledge exchange,matching,and agglomeration[J].Journal of urban economics,2006,60(1):69-95. [34]ALGUEZAUI S,FILIERI R.Investigating the role of social capital in innovation:sparse versus dense network[J].Journal of knowledge management,2010,14(6):891-909. [35]胡保亮,方刚.网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究——基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点[J].科研管理,2013,34(11):18-26. [36]阮爱君,陈劲.正式/非正式知识搜索宽度对创新绩效的影响[J].科学学研究,2015,33(10):1573-1583. [37]王永健,谢卫红,王田绘,等.强弱关系与突破式创新关系研究——吸收能力的中介作用和环境动态性的调节效应[J].管理评论,2016,28(10):111-122. [38]李明星,苏佳璐,胡成.产学研合作中企业网络位置与关系强度对技术创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(14):118-124. [39]朱霞,路正南.KIBS企业嵌入强度对科技型小微企业技术创新绩效影响研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(15):142-146. [40]明宇,司虎克.技术创新扩散动力对技术生命周期的影响——以我国运动鞋专利技术为例[J].情报杂志,2014,33(6):93-98. [41]吴颖文,纪杨建,顾新建.基于专利技术共现网络的共性技术识别——以家电行业为例[J].情报探索,2020,27(3):1-10. [42]CHEN C.Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts[J].Journal of the American society for information science and technology,2011,63(3):431-449. [43]任峥,王富,宋合义.基于组织前因视角的双元性创新路径研究——以格力为例[J].中国人力资源开发,2017,29(6):116-122.
2021, 
