Which of the Government Subsidies and Tax Incentives Can Better Promote the Innovation Performance of Enterprises?
Yan Huahong1, Lian Yingqi1, Tian Delu2
1.School of Accounting,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China 2.National Center for Science & Technology Evaluation,MOST,Beijing 100038,China
Abstract：Enterprise innovation activities have strong externalities.Promoting enterprises to carry out innovation activities through government subsidies and preferential tax policies and improving enterprise innovation performance has been the common means adopted by governments in various countries.Taking A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2012 to 2016 as the research object,this paper empirically examines the relationship between government subsidies,preferential tax policies and enterprise innovation performance.This paper finds that both government subsidies and preferential tax policies can help enterprises to improve innovation performance.Generally speaking,preferential tax policies are better than government subsidies in promoting enterprise innovation performance.But the further research results show that in state-owned enterprises,the effect of government subsidies on innovation performance is better than tax preferential policies.
闫华红, 廉英麒, 田德录. 政府补助与税收优惠哪个更能促进企业创新绩效[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(9): 40-48.
Yan Huahong, Lian Yingqi, Tian Delu. Which of the Government Subsidies and Tax Incentives Can Better Promote the Innovation Performance of Enterprises?. , 2019(9): 40-48.
[1]HAMBER.R&D essays on the economics of the research and development[D].New York:Random House,1966. [2]LEVY R C,REIS P.Test of a schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure[J].Economics,1984 (45):347-361. [3]王俊.R&D补贴对企业R&D投入及创新产出影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2010 (9):1368-1374. [4]郭洪宇,黄少卿.地方性创新资助与中小企业创新绩效——基于上海浦东新区 “科技小巨人”项目的经验分析[J].中国科技论坛,2018(8):100-110. [5]LICHTENBERG Frank R.The effect of government funding on private industrial research and development:A reassessment[J].The journal of industrial economics,1987,36 (1):97-104. [6]GOOLSHE A.Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers[J].American econonmic review,1998. [7]许治,师萍.政府科技投入对企业R&D支出影响的实证分析[J].研究与发展管理,2005 (3):22-26. [8]GUELLEC D.The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D[J].Economics of innovation & new technology,2000,12 (3):225-243. [9]CLAUSEN T H.Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level[J].Structural change and economic dynamics,2009,20 (4):239-253. [10]李培楠,赵兰香,万劲波.创新要素对企业创新绩效的影响:基于中国制造业和高技术产业数据的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2014 (4):604-612. [11]林洲钰,林汉川,邓兴华.政府补贴对企业专利产出的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2015 (6):842-849. [12]BRONWYN H Hall.R&D tax policy during the 1980s:Success or failure[J].Tax policy and the economy,1993 (7):1-35. [13]HALL B H,REENEN J V.How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence[J].Research policy,2000 (29):449-469. [14]夏力.税收优惠能否促进技术创新:基于创业板上市公司的研究[J].中国科技论坛,2012 (12):56-61. [15]李万福,杜静.税收优惠、调整成本与R&D投资[J].会计研究,2016 (12):58-96. [16]EISNER R,ALBERT S H,SULLIVAN M A.The new incremental tax credit for R&D:Incentive or disincentive[J].National tax journal,1984,8 (2):171-183. [17]EDWIN Mansfield,LORNE Switzer.How effective are Canada′s direct tax incentives for R&D[J].Canadian public policy,1985 (2):241-246. [18]李丽青.我国现行R&D税收优惠政策的有效性研究[J].中国软科学,2007 (7):115-120. [19]胡凯,吴清.R&D税收激励、知识产权保护与企业的专利产出[J].财经研究,2018 (4):102-115. [20]BUSOM I,CORCHUELO B,MARTINEZ_ROS E.Tax incentives or subsidies for business R&D[J].Small business economics,2014,43 (3):571-596. [21]郑春美,李佩.政府补助与税收优惠对企业创新绩效的影响:基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015 (16):83-87. [22]邹洋,聂明明,郭玲,等.财税政策对企业研发投入的影响分析[J].税务研究,2016 (8):42-46. [23]李传喜,赵讯.我国高新技术企业财税激励研发投入效应研究[J].税务研究,2016 (2):105-109. [24]马文聪,李小转,廖建聪,等.不同政府科技资助方式对企业研发投入的影响[J].科学学研究,2017 (5):689-699. [25]马玉琪,扈瑞鹏,赵彦云.财税激励政策对高新技术企业研发投入影响效应分析:基于广义倾向得分法的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛,2017 (2):143-149. [26]郭玥.政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2018 (9):98-116.
2019, 
