Relationship Between the Driving Factors of the External Commercialization of Intellectual Property and the Commercial Performance ——Based on Intermediary Effect of Desorption Capacity
Feng Qiang1,2, Cai Shuangli1
1.School of Business,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China; 2.Department of Economics and Management,Guangdong Vocational and Technical College,Foshan 528041,China
Abstract：The external commercialization of intellectual property plays an important role in revitalizing redundant resources,creating financial and strategic values.Based on the questionnaire survey data of 295 samples,the structural equation model is used to investigate the impact of the driving factors of external commercialization of intellectual property on external commercialization performance,focusing on the intermediary effect of enterprise desorption.The results show that commercial motivations and partners have a significant positive impact on commercial performance,while organizational structure has a significant negative impact on commercial performance.Commercial motivations,organizational structure and technology market have significant effects on desorption capacity.Desorption capacity has a significant positive effect on the commercialization performance;Desorption capacity plays a partial mediating role between commercial motivations,organizational structure and commercial performance,while it has a mediating effect between technological market and commercial performance.The conclusion of this paper not only expands the theory research of the external commercialization of intellectual property rights and the commercialization performance of commercialization,but also provides a practical guidance for the implementation of the external commercialization of intellectual property rights in Chinese enterprises.
冯强, 蔡双立. 知识产权外部商业化驱动因素与商业化绩效关系研究——基于解吸能力的中介效应[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(8): 129-139.
Feng Qiang, Cai Shuangli. Relationship Between the Driving Factors of the External Commercialization of Intellectual Property and the Commercial Performance ——Based on Intermediary Effect of Desorption Capacity. , 2018(8): 129-139.
[1]LICHTENTHALER U,ERNST H.External technology commercialization in large firms:results of a quantitative benchmarking study[J].R&D management,2007,37(5):383-397. [2]GASSMANN O,ENKEL E,CHESBROUGH H.The future of open innovation[J].R&D management,2010,40(3):213-221. [3]LICHTENTHALER U.External commercialization of knowledge:review and research agenda[J].International journal of management reviews,2005,7(4):231-255. [4]ZIEGLER N,RUETHER F,BADER M A,et al.Creating value through external intellectual property commercialization:a desorptive capacity view[J].The journal of technology transfer,2013,38(6):930-949. [5]曹勇,赵莉.专利获取、专利保护、专利商业化与技术创新绩效的作用机制研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(8):42-52. [6]LICHTENTHALER U,LICHTENTHALER E.A capability-based framework for open innovation:Complementing absorptive capacity[J].Journal of management studies,2009,46(8):1315-1338. [7]韵江,杨柳,付山丹.开放式创新下“吸收—解吸”能力与跨界搜索的关系[J].经济管理,2014(7):129-139. [8]陈劲,梁靓,吴航.基于解吸能力的外向型技术转移研究框架——以网络嵌入性为视角[J].技术经济,2012,31(5):8-11. [9]LICHTENTHALER U,LICHTENTHALER E.Technology transfer across organizational boundaries:absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity[J].California management review,2010,53(1):154-170. [10]KIM H,KIM Y,CHO K.The effect of research and development investment and desorptive capacity on firm performance[J].Asian Journal of technology innovation,2014,22(2):252-267. [11]张玲,崔毅.技术外部商业化、战略能力与企业绩效关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(11):124-131. [12]KORUNA S M.External technology commercialisation-policy guidelines[J].International journal of technology management,2004,27(2-3):241-254. [13]LICHTENTHALER U.External technology commercialisation projects:objectives,processes and a typology[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2008,20(4):483-501. [14]CARLSSON S,CORVELLO V,KUTVONEN A.Strategic application of outbound open innovation[J].European journal of innovation management,2011,14(4):460-474. [15]PALOMERAS N.An analysis of pure-revenue technology licensing[J].Journal of economics & management strategy,2007,16(4):971-994. [16]AHN J M,JU Y,MOON T H,et al.Beyond absorptive capacity in open innovation process:the relationships between openness,capacities and firm performance[J].Technology analysis & Strategic management,2016,28(9):1009-1028. [17]FOSFURI A.The licensing dilemma:understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing[J].Strategic management journal,2006,27(12):1141-1158. [18]LICHTENTHALER U.The drivers of technology licensing:an industry comparison[J].California management review,2007,49(4):67-89. [19]BIANCHI M,CHIARONI D,CHIESA V,et al.Organizing for external technology commercialization:evidence from a multiple case study in the pharmaceutical industry[J].R&D management,2011,41(2):120-137. [20]BENASSI M,DI MININ A.Playing in between:patent brokers in markets for technology[J].R&d Management,2009,39(1):68-86. [21]AHN J M,MORTARA L,MINSHALL T.The effects of open innovation on firm performance:a capacity approach[J].ST1 policy review,2013(4):74-93. [22]KORUNA S M.External technology commercialisation-policy guidelines[J].International journal of technology management,2004,27(2/3):241-254. [23]BARON R M,KENNY D A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations.[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,1986,51(6):1173. [24]HAYES A F.Beyond Baron and Kenny:statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium[J].Communication monographs,2009,76(4):408-420. [25]陈瑞,郑毓煌,刘文静.中介效应分析:原理,程序,Bootstrap 方法及其应用[J].营销科学学报,2013,9(4):120-135.
2018, 
