|
|
Establishment of Chief Data Officer System and Risk Prevention in the Perspective of Government Data Sharing |
Hua ZiYan |
Law School, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China |
|
|
Abstract Government data sharing faces practical difficulties such as poor data quality, low sustainability, uncontrollable security risks, and difficult exit in the stages of data collection, sharing, utilization, and withdrawal.These dilemmas are affected by multiple factors such as government organizational structure, inherent disadvantages of the current sharing model and technical barriers.From the perspective of government data sharing, the chief data officer can not only resolve the multi-dimensional difficulties, but also conform to the overall orientation of national policies.However, as a new thing, the chief data officer has uncertainties in the control of subjective attitudes, supply of objective capabilities, supervision and evaluation, which may cause potential risks and should be prevented in a targeted manner.First, a power and responsibility list system should be established to control uncertain risks at the subjective attitude level;second, the talent supply model should be clarified to eliminate uncertain risks at the objective ability level;third, an assessment and evaluation mechanism should be established to eliminate uncertainties at the level of supervision and evaluation risk.
|
Received: 06 January 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 华子岩.企业首席数据官的制度缘起及保障机制.民主与法制时报,2022-09-14 (3).
[2] 谭颜波.政府首席数据官制度建设试探.领导科学,2022 (5):143-145.
[3] 王芳,储君,张琪敏.跨部门政府数据共享:问题、原因与对策.图书与情报,2017 (5):54-62.
[4] 翟云.基于 “互联网+政务服务”情境的数据共享与业务协同.中国行政管理,2017 (10):64-68.
[5] 戚学祥.区块链技术在政府数据治理中的应用:优势、挑战与对策.北京理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2018 (5):105-111.
[6] 胡海波.理解整体性政府数据治理:政府与社会的互动.情报杂志,2021 (3):153-161.
[7] 李重照,黄璜.中国地方政府数据共享的影响因素研究.中国行政管理,2019 (8):47-54.
[8] 黄如花,陈闯.美国政府数据开放共享的合作模式.图书情报工作,2016 (19):6-14.
[9] 詹国彬.英国数字政府转型:价值理念、技术工具与制度保障.行政论坛,2021 (6):136-143.
[10] 黄如花,林焱.法国政府数据开放共享的政策法规保障及对我国的启示.图书馆,2017 (3):1-6.
[11] 聂钰,肖忠东,冯泰文.大数据时代首席数据官的角色与职责.中国科技论坛,2019 (7):157-164.
[12] 夏义堃.政府首席数据官制度的核心要义与运行分析.图书情报工作,2020 (1):74-83.
[13] 蒋敏娟.迈向数据驱动的政府:大数据时代的首席数据官:内涵、价值与推进策略.行政管理改革,2022 (5):31-40.
[14] 夏义堃.论政府首席数据官制度的建立:兼论大数据局模式与运行机制.图书情报工作,2020 (18):21-29.
[15] 燕继荣.条块分割及其治理.西华师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2022 (1):1-6.
[16] 潘祥辉.去科层化:互联网在中国政治传播中的功能再考察.浙江社会科学,2011 (1):36-43.
[17] 范静,张朋柱.基于电子政务环境下的组织间信息共享成功因素模型研究.情报科学,2007 (7):1080-1084.
[18] 李珒.协同视角下政府数据共享的障碍及其治理.中国行政管理,2021 (2):101-106.
[19] MARCELLA Atzori.Blockchain technology and decentralized governance:is the state still necessary.Journal of governance and regulation,2017,6 (1):45-62.
[20] 刘冰. “跨省通办”中数据共享的新挑战及协同治理策略.电子政务,2022 (2):88-96.
[21] MCALLISTER D J.Affect and cognition based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations.Academy of management journal,1995 (38):24-59.
[22] 黄如花,温芳芳.我国政府数据开放共享的政策框架与内容:国家层面政策文本的内容分析.图书情报工作,2017 (10):12-25.
[23] 张勇进,章美林.政务信息系统整合共享历程、经验与方向.中国行政管理,2018 (3):22-26.
[24] 广东省人民政府办公厅.广东省人民政府办公厅关于印发广东省首席数据官制度试点工作方案的通知 (粤办函〔2021〕63号). (2021-05-14).http://www.gd.gov.cn/zwgk/wjk/qbwj/ybh/content/post_3281723.html.
[25] 中国网信网.数字中国发展报告 (2021年). (2022-08-02).http://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-08/02/c_1661066515613920.htm.
[26] 新华网.贵州建设12个主题库促进政府数据开放共享. (2021-01-28).http://www.xinhuanet.com/2021-01/28/c_1127035545.htm.
[27] 上海市静安区人民政府.静安区在全市率先建立首席数据官制度. (2022-12-19).https://www.jingan.gov.cn/rmtzx/003001/20221219/e0772fe8-8104-4297-80a2-1ae4f2e82d40.html.
[28] 常州市人民政府.常州市首席数据官制度建设实施意见. (2022-09-30).http://www.changzhou.gov.cn/gi_news/18166452819421.
[29] 人民网.绍兴市推出首席数据官制度. (2021-06-28).http://zj.people.com.cn/n2/2021/0628/c186327-34797066.html.
[30] 新浪网.试点!中山创新推行首席数据官制度. (2021-08-16).https://k.sina.com.cn/article_1895096900_70f4e244020017qi9.html.
[31] 滁州市数据资源局.滁州市率先开展 “首席数据官”试点. (2022-05-11).https://sjzyj.ah.gov.cn/public/7061/40559173.html.
[32] 沈阳网.沈阳推行首席数据官制度首批选取28家试点单位. (2022-06-02).http://www.echinagov.com/info/324261.
[33] 韦静.深化 “用数”效果 数字红利惠民我市成为首席数据官制度试点城市.南宁日报,2023-02-09 (4).
[34] 闫建,高华丽.发达国家大数据发展战略的启示.理论探索,2015 (1):91-94.
[35] 朱光磊,赵志远.政府职责体系视角下的权责清单制度构建逻辑.南开学报 (哲学社会科学版),2020 (3):1-9.
[36] 刘启川.通过责任清单实现政务公开法治化.中国行政管理,2018 (7):71-78.
[37] 鞠锡田.试论教育评估的本质属性.当代教育科学,2017 (7):45-49.
[38] 邓蔚,华子岩.以效果为导向的法治政府建设评估模式.河南财经政法大学学报,2019 (5):13-21. |
|
|
|