|
|
|
| Decision-Making Logic and Method on Original and Leading National Key S&T Project |
| Feng Ying |
| Institute of Science and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Original and leading national major S&T projects rank at the “pyramid tip” of china's major S&T project system, which is one of the key core issues in the field of S&T decision-making, but there is still a gap in the research of S&T decision-making for such projects.This paper points out that the logic of S&T decision-making for such projects should be able to define “super science”, and also need to cope with three types of decision-making problems, namely, ultra-complex organisational management, ultra-high difficulty in engineering realisation, and financial auditing.This study selects the best of the original and leading major S&T projects built by the global S&T community in the past 30 years, i.e., the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)project led by the United States, with the participation of Europe and Canada, as a case study, and condenses and summarises the decision-making logic and methods of such projects, so as to provide the best solution for the “14th Five-Year Plan”and to provide the best solution for the “14th Five-Year Plan”.It adds new theoretical perspectives and methodological investigations to the decision-making process of major national S&T projects of an original and leading nature in the 14th Five-Year Plan and the mid and long term period from 2021 to 2035, and is expected to cause the S&T policy research community to dig deeper into this important topic.
|
|
Received: 18 July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 封颖. “十四五”及 2021—2035 年中长期科技发展规划阶段我国科技战略决策视角的研究.全球科技经济瞭望,2021 (8):7-19.
[2] 封颖.科技政策与产业政策协同关系的再认识.中国科技论坛,2020 (8):53-61.
[3] 张九庆.从超导超级对撞机 (SSC)看大科学工程研究的实施.科技中国,2016 (10):48-53.
[4] 李侠.科研范式变革了,科技界怎么做.中国科学报,2021-09-01 (1).
[5] Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences of the National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine.Powering science:NASA's large strategic science missions. (2022-09-25).https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24857/powering-science-nasas-large-strategic-science-missions.
[6] ILLINGWORTH Garth.Thoughts on flagship missions:JWST and the implications for getting what's next. (2022-10-25).www.ucolick.org/~gdi/early_jwst/.
[7] BILLINGS Lee.Space science:the telescope that ate astronomy.Nature,2010,467:1028-1030.
[8] MOUNTAI Matt,COHEN Adam.Billion-dollar telescopes could end up beyond the reach of US astronomers.Nature,2018,559:16-17.
[9] JWST Independent Review Board. (2022-10-24).https://science.house.gov/hearings/james-webb-space-telescope-program-breach-and-its-implications.
[10] JWST Partners and Contributors. (2022-10-25).https://www.webb.nasa.gov/content/meetTheTeam/team.html.
[11] MARTHER John.JWST science summary of SSB. (2022-08-25).https://webb.nasa.gov/resources/ssb_2006/mather_sciencesummary.pdf.
[12] REICHARD Tony.Is the next big thing too big.Nature,2006,440:140-143.
[13] HOWARD Rick.James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)program status and replan. (2022-08-25).https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/resources/JWSTAPSJuly132011revA.pdf. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
