适应高水平自立自强的科技创新双层治理逻辑与实现路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6564 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Science and technology innovation is a complex and multifaceted system project, which requires the participation of multiple macro and micro subjects to achieve collaborative governance.Under the overall goal requirement of high-level science and technology self-reliance and self-improvement, science and technology governance needs to take into account both macro and micro levels, and promote the construction of science and technology innovation with micro subjects as the core.This paper constructs a two-tier governance system of science and technology innovation based on the target requirements of high-level science and technology self-sufficiency and self-improvement in the new era.Among them, the core of macro governance is to correctly deal with the relationship between government, market and society, systematically promote macro policy reform and create a good ecological environment for science and technology innovation.The core of micro governance is to strengthen self-organization and collaborative innovation by clarifying the functional positioning of each subject, so as to stimulate endogenous innovation vitality.Macro and micro two-tier governance need to be effectively integrated to jointly promote the development of high-level science and technology self-reliance and self-improvement.

Key words： High level of self-reliance and self-improvement Scientific and technological innovation Two-tier governance Micro foundation

Received: 08 October 2022

PACS:

F204

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Han Fengqin
	Chen Yaping

Cite this article:

Han Fengqin,Chen Yaping. The Logic and Realization Path of Double-Layer Governance of Science and Technology Innovation to Adapt to a High Level of Self-reliance and Self-improvement[J]. , 2023, 4(9): 1-9.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2023/V4/I9/1

[1] 王志刚.加快实现高水平科技自立自强.人民日报,2022-12-23 (9).
[2] 韩凤芹,史卫.破解科技创新政策 “落地难”.中国财政,2019 (5):50-52.
[3] 吴金希,孙蕊,马蕾.科技治理体系现代化:概念、特征与挑战.科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (8):3-9.
[4] 胡鞍钢.治理现代化的实质是制度现代化——如何理解全面深化改革的总目标.人民论坛,2013 (S2):20-23.
[5] 王名.治理创新重在政社分开.人民论坛,2014 (10):40-41.
[6] 汪玉凯.用信息化推动城市治理现代化.中国经济和信息化,2014 (5):83.
[7] 朱本用,陈喜乐.试论科技治理的柔性模式.自然辩证法研究,2019,35 (10):44-49.
[8] 朱旭峰.为全球前沿科技治理提供中国方案.国家治理,2020 (35):3-6.
[9] 张来武.科技创新的宏观管理:从公共管理走向公共治理.中国软科学,2012 (6):1-5.
[10] 杨继明,冯俊文.从创新治理视角看我国科技宏观管理体制改革走向.科技进步与对策,2013,30 (3):99-103.
[11] 张成岗.数字文明时代的科技发展与国家治理现代化.中国科技论坛,2022 (5):3.
[12] 樊春良.国家科技治理体系的理论构架与政策蕴含.科学学与科学技术管理,2022,43 (3):3-23.
[13] 陈套.从科技管理到创新治理的嬗变:内涵、模式和路径选择.西北工业大学学报 (社会科学版),2015,35 (3):1-6.
[14] 高学栋,王占益,张忠生.科技创新中的 “孤岛现象”及其治理之道.东岳论丛,2018,39 (7):163-168.
[15] 崔云朋,乔瑞金.新时代创新主体实践路径研究.经济问题,2020 (2):9.
[16] 高宏伟,肖广岭,李峰,等.产业技术创新联合主体:概念,类型与特征研究.科学学研究,2018,36 (1):10.
[17] 厉以宁.超越市场与超越政府.北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2015.
[18] 李绍先. “中体西用”文化别论.中华文化论坛,2007 (2):153-157.
[19] 韩凤芹,陈亚平.科研事业单位收入分配改革的逻辑:基于系统论的分析.中国科技论坛,2022 (6):7.
[20] 周振华.新机遇·新风险·新选择.上海:上海人民出版社,2013.